public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/09] drm/i915: fix DP AUX register definitions on Haswell
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:03:40 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340996621-14345-8-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340996621-14345-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>

From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

The old rule that the AUX registers are just an offset (+4 and +10)
from output_reg is not true anymore, since output_reg in on the CPU
and some AUX regs are on the PCH.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |    8 ++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

The previous patch series didn't need this patch because they were calling
intel_dp_init with PCH_DP_B as the second argument. IMHO this is ugly because
PCH_DP_B does not exist on Haswell. This value will become intel_dp->output_reg
and then eventually some functions will even write to it.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index f28f2b2..475ada8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -2493,6 +2493,14 @@
 #define DPD_AUX_CH_DATA4		0x64320
 #define DPD_AUX_CH_DATA5		0x64324
 
+#define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_CTL		0xe4110
+#define PCH_DPC_AUX_CH_CTL		0xe4210
+#define PCH_DPD_AUX_CH_CTL		0xe4310
+
+#define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_DATA		0xe4114
+#define PCH_DPC_AUX_CH_DATA		0xe4214
+#define PCH_DPD_AUX_CH_DATA		0xe4314
+
 #define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY	    (1 << 31)
 #define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_DONE		    (1 << 30)
 #define   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_INTERRUPT	    (1 << 29)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 287bef9..22dae6d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -356,6 +356,27 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	uint32_t aux_clock_divider;
 	int try, precharge;
 
+	if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
+		switch (intel_dp->port) {
+		case PORT_A:
+			ch_ctl = DPA_AUX_CH_CTL;
+			ch_data = DPA_AUX_CH_DATA1;
+			break;
+		case PORT_B:
+			ch_ctl = PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_CTL;
+			ch_data = PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_DATA;
+			break;
+		case PORT_C:
+			ch_ctl = PCH_DPC_AUX_CH_CTL;
+			ch_data = PCH_DPC_AUX_CH_DATA;
+			break;
+		case PORT_D:
+			ch_ctl = PCH_DPD_AUX_CH_CTL;
+			ch_data = PCH_DPD_AUX_CH_DATA;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
 	intel_dp_check_edp(intel_dp);
 	/* The clock divider is based off the hrawclk,
 	 * and would like to run at 2MHz. So, take the
-- 
1.7.10.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-29 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-29 19:03 [PATCH 01/09] drm/i915: move common code to intel_dp_set_link_train Paulo Zanoni
2012-06-29 19:03 ` [PATCH 02/09] drm/i915: try to train DP even harder Paulo Zanoni
2012-07-12 14:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-29 19:03 ` [PATCH 03/09] drm/i915: Move DP structs to shared location Paulo Zanoni
2012-07-12 15:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-29 19:03 ` [PATCH 04/09] drm/i915: Add "port" field to struct intel_dp Paulo Zanoni
2012-07-12 15:04   ` Daniel Vetter
2012-06-29 19:03 ` [PATCH 05/09] drm/i915: add basic Haswell DP enablement Paulo Zanoni
2012-06-29 19:03 ` [PATCH 06/09] drm/i915: fix Haswell M/N registers Paulo Zanoni
2012-06-29 19:03 ` [PATCH 07/09] drm/i915: implement Haswell DP link train Paulo Zanoni
2012-06-29 19:03 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2012-06-29 19:03 ` [PATCH 09/09] drm/i915: init DP instead of HDMI on port B Paulo Zanoni
2012-07-12 14:52 ` [PATCH 01/09] drm/i915: move common code to intel_dp_set_link_train Daniel Vetter
2012-07-17 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Paulo Zanoni
2012-07-17 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: add port field to struct intel_dp and use it Paulo Zanoni
2012-07-18 10:42   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340996621-14345-8-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
    --to=przanoni@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox