From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: replace ad-hoc dual-link lvds checks
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:28:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352118507-6933-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352118507-6933-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
... with is_dual_link_lvds introduced in
commit b03543857fd75876b96e10d4320b775e95041bb7
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue Mar 20 13:07:05 2012 +0100
drm/i915: Check VBIOS value for determining LVDS dual channel mode, too
All these checks predate this commit and have simply been overlooked.
Since we don't support switching between single-link and dual-link
modes anyway, this different checks could at best only get in the way
of refactorings, and in the worst case cause inconsistencies.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 1ad6d34..0973391 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -690,8 +690,7 @@ intel_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
intel_clock_t clock;
int err = target;
- if (intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS) &&
- (I915_READ(LVDS)) != 0) {
+ if (intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
/*
* For LVDS, if the panel is on, just rely on its current
* settings for dual-channel. We haven't figured out how to
@@ -766,8 +765,7 @@ intel_g4x_find_best_PLL(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
lvds_reg = PCH_LVDS;
else
lvds_reg = LVDS;
- if ((I915_READ(lvds_reg) & LVDS_CLKB_POWER_MASK) ==
- LVDS_CLKB_POWER_UP)
+ if (is_dual_link_lvds(dev_priv, lvds_reg))
clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
else
clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
@@ -5360,7 +5358,7 @@ static uint32_t ironlake_compute_dpll(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
if (is_lvds) {
if ((intel_panel_use_ssc(dev_priv) &&
dev_priv->lvds_ssc_freq == 100) ||
- (I915_READ(PCH_LVDS) & LVDS_CLKB_POWER_MASK) == LVDS_CLKB_POWER_UP)
+ is_dual_link_lvds(dev_priv, PCH_LVDS))
factor = 25;
} else if (is_sdvo && is_tv)
factor = 20;
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-05 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-05 12:28 [PATCH 0/8] lvds cleanup Daniel Vetter
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: add encoder->pre_pll_enable callback Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:05 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:59 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-11-16 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: replace ad-hoc dual-link lvds checks Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 16:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:07 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 17:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: move is_dual_link_lvds to intel_lvds.c Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:18 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: track is_dual_link in intel_lvds Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:41 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: add intel_lvds->reg Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:46 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: move intel_update_lvds to intel_lvds->pre_pll_enable Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:07 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: enable intel_lvds->pre_pll_enable for ilk+, too Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:17 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: rip out pre-DDI stuff from haswell_crtc_mode_set Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:28 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 18:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] lvds cleanup Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-20 13:38 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352118507-6933-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox