From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: track is_dual_link in intel_lvds
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:28:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352118507-6933-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352118507-6933-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Yeah, all users (both the clock selection special cases and the lvds
pin pair stuff) are still in common code, but this will change.
v2: Rebase on top of Jani Nikula's panel rework.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
index 2303984..e4ae3a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct intel_lvds_encoder {
u32 pfit_control;
u32 pfit_pgm_ratios;
bool pfit_dirty;
+ bool is_dual_link;
struct intel_lvds_connector *attached_connector;
};
@@ -920,6 +921,23 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_dual_link_lvds[] = {
bool is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_device *dev)
{
+ struct intel_encoder *encoder;
+ struct intel_lvds_encoder *lvds_encoder;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(encoder, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list,
+ base.head) {
+ if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS) {
+ lvds_encoder = to_lvds_encoder(&encoder->base);
+
+ return lvds_encoder->is_dual_link;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool __is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
unsigned int val;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
u32 lvds_reg;
@@ -937,19 +955,15 @@ bool is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_device *dev)
if (dmi_check_system(intel_dual_link_lvds))
return true;
- if (dev_priv->lvds_val)
- val = dev_priv->lvds_val;
- else {
- /* BIOS should set the proper LVDS register value at boot, but
- * in reality, it doesn't set the value when the lid is closed;
- * we need to check "the value to be set" in VBT when LVDS
- * register is uninitialized.
- */
- val = I915_READ(lvds_reg);
- if (!(val & ~(LVDS_PIPE_MASK | LVDS_DETECTED)))
- val = dev_priv->bios_lvds_val;
- dev_priv->lvds_val = val;
- }
+ /* BIOS should set the proper LVDS register value at boot, but
+ * in reality, it doesn't set the value when the lid is closed;
+ * we need to check "the value to be set" in VBT when LVDS
+ * register is uninitialized.
+ */
+ val = I915_READ(lvds_reg);
+ if (!(val & ~(LVDS_PIPE_MASK | LVDS_DETECTED)))
+ val = dev_priv->bios_lvds_val;
+
return (val & LVDS_CLKB_POWER_MASK) == LVDS_CLKB_POWER_UP;
}
@@ -1148,6 +1162,8 @@ bool intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *dev)
goto failed;
out:
+ lvds_encoder->is_dual_link = __is_dual_link_lvds(dev);
+
/*
* Unlock registers and just
* leave them unlocked
@@ -1164,6 +1180,7 @@ out:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("lid notifier registration failed\n");
lvds_connector->lid_notifier.notifier_call = NULL;
}
+
drm_sysfs_connector_add(connector);
intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode);
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-05 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-05 12:28 [PATCH 0/8] lvds cleanup Daniel Vetter
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: add encoder->pre_pll_enable callback Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:05 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 16:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:59 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: replace ad-hoc dual-link lvds checks Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:37 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 16:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:07 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 17:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: move is_dual_link_lvds to intel_lvds.c Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:18 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-11-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: track is_dual_link in intel_lvds Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: add intel_lvds->reg Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:46 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: move intel_update_lvds to intel_lvds->pre_pll_enable Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:07 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: enable intel_lvds->pre_pll_enable for ilk+, too Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:17 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: rip out pre-DDI stuff from haswell_crtc_mode_set Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:28 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 18:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] lvds cleanup Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-20 13:38 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1352118507-6933-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox