Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: track is_dual_link in intel_lvds
Date: Mon,  5 Nov 2012 13:28:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352118507-6933-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352118507-6933-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Yeah, all users (both the clock selection special cases and the lvds
pin pair stuff) are still in common code, but this will change.

v2: Rebase on top of Jani Nikula's panel rework.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
index 2303984..e4ae3a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct intel_lvds_encoder {
 	u32 pfit_control;
 	u32 pfit_pgm_ratios;
 	bool pfit_dirty;
+	bool is_dual_link;
 
 	struct intel_lvds_connector *attached_connector;
 };
@@ -920,6 +921,23 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_dual_link_lvds[] = {
 
 bool is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
+	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
+	struct intel_lvds_encoder *lvds_encoder;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(encoder, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list,
+			    base.head) {
+		if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS) {
+			lvds_encoder = to_lvds_encoder(&encoder->base);
+
+			return lvds_encoder->is_dual_link;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static bool __is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
 	unsigned int val;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	u32 lvds_reg;
@@ -937,19 +955,15 @@ bool is_dual_link_lvds(struct drm_device *dev)
 	if (dmi_check_system(intel_dual_link_lvds))
 		return true;
 
-	if (dev_priv->lvds_val)
-		val = dev_priv->lvds_val;
-	else {
-		/* BIOS should set the proper LVDS register value at boot, but
-		 * in reality, it doesn't set the value when the lid is closed;
-		 * we need to check "the value to be set" in VBT when LVDS
-		 * register is uninitialized.
-		 */
-		val = I915_READ(lvds_reg);
-		if (!(val & ~(LVDS_PIPE_MASK | LVDS_DETECTED)))
-			val = dev_priv->bios_lvds_val;
-		dev_priv->lvds_val = val;
-	}
+	/* BIOS should set the proper LVDS register value at boot, but
+	 * in reality, it doesn't set the value when the lid is closed;
+	 * we need to check "the value to be set" in VBT when LVDS
+	 * register is uninitialized.
+	 */
+	val = I915_READ(lvds_reg);
+	if (!(val & ~(LVDS_PIPE_MASK | LVDS_DETECTED)))
+		val = dev_priv->bios_lvds_val;
+
 	return (val & LVDS_CLKB_POWER_MASK) == LVDS_CLKB_POWER_UP;
 }
 
@@ -1148,6 +1162,8 @@ bool intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 		goto failed;
 
 out:
+	lvds_encoder->is_dual_link = __is_dual_link_lvds(dev);
+
 	/*
 	 * Unlock registers and just
 	 * leave them unlocked
@@ -1164,6 +1180,7 @@ out:
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("lid notifier registration failed\n");
 		lvds_connector->lid_notifier.notifier_call = NULL;
 	}
+
 	drm_sysfs_connector_add(connector);
 
 	intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode);
-- 
1.7.11.7

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-05 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-05 12:28 [PATCH 0/8] lvds cleanup Daniel Vetter
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: add encoder->pre_pll_enable callback Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:05   ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 16:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:59       ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: replace ad-hoc dual-link lvds checks Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:37   ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 16:56     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:07       ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 17:17         ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: move is_dual_link_lvds to intel_lvds.c Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:18   ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-11-16 17:41   ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: track is_dual_link in intel_lvds Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: add intel_lvds->reg Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 17:46   ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: move intel_update_lvds to intel_lvds->pre_pll_enable Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:07   ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: enable intel_lvds->pre_pll_enable for ilk+, too Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:17   ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: rip out pre-DDI stuff from haswell_crtc_mode_set Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 18:28   ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-16 18:33     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-11-16 16:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] lvds cleanup Paulo Zanoni
2012-11-20 13:38   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1352118507-6933-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox