From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: fix gtt space allocated for tiled objects
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:18:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357327133.4147.9.camel@ideak-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c3329$7v1jn1@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3646 bytes --]
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 17:47 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:23:42 +0200, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 17:07 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:42:00 +0200, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > The gtt space needed for tiled objects might be bigger than the linear
> > > > size programmed into the correpsonding fence register. For example for
> > > > the following buffer on a Gen5+ HW:
> > > >
> > > > - allocation size: 4096 bytes
> > > > - tiling mode: X tiled
> > > > - stride: 1536
> > > >
> > > > we need (1536 / 512) * 4096 bytes of gtt space to cover all the pixels
> > > > in the buffer, but at the moment we allocate only 4096. This means that
> > > > any buffer following this tiled buffer in the gtt space will be
> > > > corrupted if pixels belonging to the 2nd and 3rd tiles are written.
> > > >
> > > > Fix this by rounding up the size of the allocated gtt space to the next
> > > > tile row address. The page frames beyond the allocation size will be
> > > > backed by the single gtt scratch page used already elsewhere for similar
> > > > padding.
> > > >
> > > > Note that this is more of a security/robustness problem and not fixing any
> > > > reported issue that I know of. This is because applications will normally
> > > > access only the part of the buffer that is tile row size aligned.
> > >
> > > There should not be any reported issues because all userspace already
> > > allocates up to the end of tile-row and stride should be enforced to be
> > > a multiple of tile-width. So the use of DIV_ROUND_UP implies a
> > > programming error that should have been reported back to userspace
> > > earlier. We can extend that by checking to make sure userspace has
> > > allocated a valid buffer, that is, it has allocated sufficient pages for
> > > the sampler access into the tiled buffer (or reject the set-tiling).
> > > -Chris
> >
> > Ok, I tested this with older UXA that still allocated non-aligned
> > buffers. If that's not the case any more then rejecting set-tiling if
> > it's called on a non tile-row size aligned buffer would work too.
>
> Meep. A long time ago we got the calcuations wrong (slightly less for
> gen2), but it was and still is a userspace bug with the potential of
> handing the GPU.
>
> A multiple of tile_height tall and a mutiple of tile_width across should
> always be an exact number of pages (and an exact multiple of tile-row
> pages). And we should have been obeying that since the introduction of
> set-tiling (ignoring the aforementioned bugs) - so I'd really like to
> see any evidence of userspace getting that wrong.
On Ubuntu 12.10, with xf86-video-intel 2.20.9 I get the attached log
with the following patch applied:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
index 7b0a3b3..846e96f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
@@ -236,9 +236,17 @@ i915_tiling_ok(struct drm_device *dev, int stride,
int size, int tiling_mode)
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
if (stride & (tile_width - 1))
return false;
- return true;
}
+ if (size % (stride / tile_width * PAGE_SIZE))
+ printk("unaligned tiling: comm %.*s size %u mode %c stride %d
size-mod-tilerow-size %zd\n",
+ (int)sizeof(current->comm), current->comm,
+ size, tiling_mode == I915_TILING_X ? 'X' : 'Y',
+ stride, size % (stride / tile_width * PAGE_SIZE));
+
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4)
+ return true;
+
/* Pre-965 needs power of two tile widths */
if (stride < tile_width)
return false;
[-- Attachment #2: log --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4271 bytes --]
dmesg | grep unaligned | cut -c 16- | sort | uniq -c
2 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 10485760 mode X stride 6656 size-mod-tilerow-size 49152
2 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 10485760 mode Y stride 6400 size-mod-tilerow-size 40960
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 1572864 mode Y stride 2944 size-mod-tilerow-size 65536
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 163840 mode X stride 6144 size-mod-tilerow-size 16384
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 163840 mode Y stride 1536 size-mod-tilerow-size 16384
2 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 229376 mode Y stride 1152 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 2621440 mode Y stride 4736 size-mod-tilerow-size 45056
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 262144 mode X stride 5120 size-mod-tilerow-size 16384
2 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 327680 mode X stride 6144 size-mod-tilerow-size 32768
6 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 327680 mode X stride 6656 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 327680 mode Y stride 3072 size-mod-tilerow-size 32768
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 327680 mode Y stride 4736 size-mod-tilerow-size 24576
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 3670016 mode X stride 3072 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 458752 mode Y stride 6400 size-mod-tilerow-size 49152
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 524288 mode Y stride 384 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
1 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 6291456 mode X stride 6656 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
2 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 6291456 mode Y stride 6400 size-mod-tilerow-size 147456
6 unaligned tiling: comm compiz size 65536 mode Y stride 640 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
1 unaligned tiling: comm unity_support_t size 6291456 mode Y stride 6400 size-mod-tilerow-size 147456
69 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 114688 mode X stride 2560 size-mod-tilerow-size 12288
152 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 1310720 mode X stride 1536 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
3 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 131072 mode X stride 2560 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
317 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 131072 mode X stride 3072 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
4 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 163840 mode X stride 1536 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
87 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 163840 mode X stride 3072 size-mod-tilerow-size 16384
1104 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 163840 mode X stride 3584 size-mod-tilerow-size 20480
1 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 163840 mode X stride 4608 size-mod-tilerow-size 16384
1 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 163840 mode X stride 6656 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
2 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 196608 mode X stride 2560 size-mod-tilerow-size 12288
12 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 196608 mode X stride 3584 size-mod-tilerow-size 24576
20 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 196608 mode X stride 4608 size-mod-tilerow-size 12288
2 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 2097152 mode X stride 2560 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
10 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 229376 mode X stride 3072 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
193 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 2621440 mode X stride 4608 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
4 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 262144 mode X stride 1536 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
16 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 262144 mode X stride 4608 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
1 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 3145728 mode X stride 5632 size-mod-tilerow-size 36864
3 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 327680 mode X stride 1536 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
2 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 393216 mode X stride 4608 size-mod-tilerow-size 24576
3 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 40960 mode X stride 1536 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
1 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 5242880 mode X stride 5632 size-mod-tilerow-size 16384
116 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 6291456 mode X stride 6656 size-mod-tilerow-size 8192
280 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 65536 mode X stride 1536 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
6 unaligned tiling: comm Xorg size 65536 mode X stride 2560 size-mod-tilerow-size 4096
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-04 16:41 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: fix gtt space allocated for tiled objects Imre Deak
2013-01-04 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: merge get_gtt_alignment/get_unfenced_gtt_alignment() Imre Deak
2013-01-04 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: merge {i965, sandybridge}_write_fence_reg() Imre Deak
2013-01-04 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: use gtt_get_size() instead of open coding it Imre Deak
2013-01-04 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: factor out i915_gem_get_tile_width() Imre Deak
2013-01-04 16:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: fix gtt space allocated for tiled objects Imre Deak
2013-01-04 17:07 ` Chris Wilson
2013-01-04 17:23 ` Imre Deak
2013-01-04 17:47 ` Chris Wilson
2013-01-04 19:18 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2013-01-04 20:32 ` Chris Wilson
2013-01-04 20:54 ` Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915: merge get_gtt_alignment/get_unfenced_gtt_alignment() Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: merge {i965, sandybridge}_write_fence_reg() Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: use gtt_get_size() instead of open coding it Imre Deak
2013-01-14 16:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-01-14 16:28 ` Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: factor out i915_gem_get_tile_width() Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915: reject tiling for objects smaller than their tile row size Imre Deak
2013-01-09 15:18 ` [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915: check tile object alignment explicitly Imre Deak
2013-01-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: fix gtt space allocated for tiled objects Imre Deak
2013-01-08 9:59 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357327133.4147.9.camel@ideak-mobl \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox