From: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: "hdegoede@redhat.com" <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PSR lag fixes
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:49:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521062030.4958.90.camel@dk-H97M-D3H> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b19ccc80-83f4-4908-8f13-25708c5a3e50@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 09:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12-02-18 18:42, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 09:45 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 12-02-18 07:08, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> >>> PSR currently when enabled results in semi-permanent freezes or noticeable
> >>> cursor lags.
> >>>
> >>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/37598/ will fix long freezes due
> >>> to frame counter resets.
> >>>
> >>> This series has three more fixes -
> >>> Patch 1 eliminates PSR exit for flips and makes us rely on the HW to do it.
> >>> Patch 2 fixes cusor move lag by relying on HW to exit PSR.
> >>> Patch 3 fixes temporary freeze seen with fbdev.
> >>>
> >>> With both the series applied, PSR on my SKL ThinkPad feels pretty good.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your great work on this.
> >>
> >> Are there any more PSR fixes in the pipeline?
> >
> > Yeah, there are a few more fixes that I hope will appear on the list in
> > the next two weeks or so.
>
> Ok, can you send a mail when you're done (in sofar any software is ever
> "done") and you would like me to ask all people who have been kind enough
> to test PSR to retest ?
>
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your patience and help. I believe the current drm-tip is in a
decent shape to retest PSR. Booting with i915.enable_psr = 1 is still
needed. The fixes have been mostly developed/tested on gen-9 hardware
but they apply to other platforms too.
-DK
> >> If not I think I should do
> >> a custom Fedora kernel build based on 4.15 + recent fixes and ask all my
> >> testers to retest with that.
> >>
> >> I do have some questions before I do this:
> >>
> >> 1) I believe that only testers with skylake (normal or LP) or newer should
> >> re-test, correct?
> >
> > These fixes do apply for HSW/BDW, so essentially all the big cores
> > supporting PSR. But, HSW/BDW need fixes for AUX channel-PSR interaction
> > also. I haven't looked into CHV/VLV.
> >
> >>
> >> 2) I know there are 2 series (including this one), can someone provide a link
> >> to the latest patchwork version of those 2 series, or even better a git
> >> branch with 4.15 + those patches? Any patches I'm missing if I pick up these
> >> 2 series?
> >
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/37598/
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/38067/
> >
> >
> >> 3) I'm thinking 4.15 atm, but I could also do a 4.16-rc1 test kernel instead
> >> if that would be better, would that be better ?
> >
> > I can't think of any diff that would affect PSR, but the latest is
> > better I suppose.
>
> Ok.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 6:08 [PATCH 0/3] PSR lag fixes Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/psr: Use more PSR HW tracking Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12 6:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/psr: HW tracking for cursor moves to fix lags Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12 9:33 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-13 21:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-13 21:54 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-13 22:10 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-13 22:15 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-13 22:45 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-13 22:59 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-14 0:20 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-12 6:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/psr: Wait for PSR transition to complete before exiting Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12 6:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for PSR lag fixes Patchwork
2018-02-12 7:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
2018-02-12 8:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Hans de Goede
2018-02-12 17:42 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-14 8:25 ` Hans de Goede
2018-03-14 20:49 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran [this message]
2018-03-14 22:09 ` Hans de Goede
2018-03-14 23:35 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-03-16 0:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-18 19:17 ` Hans de Goede
2018-02-13 22:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for PSR lag fixes (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1521062030.4958.90.camel@dk-H97M-D3H \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox