public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PSR lag fixes
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:17:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8dcce7d-2b3f-44b9-593e-e72fe218cbf0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180316001612.GK3945@intel.com>

Hi,

On 16-03-18 01:16, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:35:55PM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 23:09 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 14-03-18 21:49, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 09:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12-02-18 18:42, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 09:45 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12-02-18 07:08, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
>>>>>>>> PSR currently when enabled results in semi-permanent freezes or noticeable
>>>>>>>> cursor lags.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/37598/ will fix long freezes due
>>>>>>>> to frame counter resets.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This series has three more fixes -
>>>>>>>> Patch 1 eliminates PSR exit for flips and makes us rely on the HW to do it.
>>>>>>>> Patch 2 fixes cusor move lag by relying on HW to exit PSR.
>>>>>>>> Patch 3 fixes temporary freeze seen with fbdev.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With both the series applied, PSR on my SKL ThinkPad feels pretty good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for your great work on this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are there any more PSR fixes in the pipeline?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, there are a few more fixes that I hope will appear on the list in
>>>>>> the next two weeks or so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, can you send a mail when you're done (in sofar any software is ever
>>>>> "done") and you would like me to ask all people who have been kind enough
>>>>> to test PSR to retest ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patience and help. I believe the current drm-tip is in a
>>>> decent shape to retest PSR. Booting with i915.enable_psr = 1 is still
>>>> needed. The fixes have been mostly developed/tested on gen-9 hardware
>>>> but they apply to other platforms too.
>>>
>>> Cool, thank you. Current drm-tip will all be merged into 4.17-rc1, right?
> 
> Unfortunately no. All changes current in dinq and not on drm-intel-next are only
> going to 4.18-rc1.

Bummer.

Pandiyan, can you make a list of commits or patch-work series links
which contain the PSR related fixes? Then I will try to backport those
to 4.16 (when I find time for this).

Regards,

Hans





> 
>>
>> Rodrigo,
>>
>> Can you help me answer that?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Then I think I will just wait for that, most distros already provide rc builds
>>> for testing, so that way it will be easy for people to test.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -DK
>>>>
>>>>>>> If not I think I should do
>>>>>>> a custom Fedora kernel build based on 4.15 + recent fixes and ask all my
>>>>>>> testers to retest with that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I do have some questions before I do this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) I believe that only testers with skylake (normal or LP) or newer should
>>>>>>> re-test, correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These fixes do apply for HSW/BDW, so essentially all the big cores
>>>>>> supporting PSR. But, HSW/BDW need fixes for AUX channel-PSR interaction
>>>>>> also. I haven't looked into CHV/VLV.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) I know there are 2 series (including this one), can someone provide a link
>>>>>>> to the latest patchwork version of those 2 series, or even better a git
>>>>>>> branch with 4.15 + those patches? Any patches I'm missing if I pick up these
>>>>>>> 2 series?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/37598/
>>>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/38067/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3) I'm thinking 4.15 atm, but I could also do a 4.16-rc1 test kernel instead
>>>>>>> if that would be better, would that be better ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't think of any diff that would affect PSR, but the latest is
>>>>>> better I suppose.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hans
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-18 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12  6:08 [PATCH 0/3] PSR lag fixes Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12  6:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/psr: Use more PSR HW tracking Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12  6:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/psr: HW tracking for cursor moves to fix lags Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12  9:33   ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-13 21:46     ` [PATCH v2] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-13 21:54       ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-13 22:10         ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-13 22:15           ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-13 22:45             ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-13 22:59               ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-14  0:20                 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-12  6:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/psr: Wait for PSR transition to complete before exiting Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-12  6:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for PSR lag fixes Patchwork
2018-02-12  7:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
2018-02-12  8:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Hans de Goede
2018-02-12 17:42   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-02-14  8:25     ` Hans de Goede
2018-03-14 20:49       ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-03-14 22:09         ` Hans de Goede
2018-03-14 23:35           ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-03-16  0:16             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-18 19:17               ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-02-13 22:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for PSR lag fixes (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8dcce7d-2b3f-44b9-593e-e72fe218cbf0@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox