From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use PIPE_CONTROL for flushing on gen6+.
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:57:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111005155713.6e2f0c6c@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317708160-1761-3-git-send-email-kenneth@whitecape.org>
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:02:40 -0700
Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org> wrote:
> From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 5 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> v2:
> - Add State & Constant Cache bits as suggested by Daniel.
> - Specify length directly rather than hiding it in a GEN6 #define.
> - Use more verbose bit field names, for clarity.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index bfe8488..81713ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@
> #define DISPLAY_PLANE_A (0<<20)
> #define DISPLAY_PLANE_B (1<<20)
> #define GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL ((0x3<<29)|(0x3<<27)|(0x2<<24))
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL (1<<20)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE (1<<14)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_STALL (1<<13)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_FLUSH (1<<12)
> @@ -250,7 +251,11 @@
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_FLUSH (1<<10) /* GM45+ only */
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_INDIRECT_STATE_DISABLE (1<<9)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_NOTIFY (1<<8)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<4)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<3)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE (1<<2)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_STALL_AT_SCOREBOARD (1<<1)
> +#define PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH (1<<0)
> #define PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<2) /* in addr dword */
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 2b572fd..f841d5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,16 @@
> #include "i915_trace.h"
> #include "intel_drv.h"
>
> +/*
> + * 965+ support PIPE_CONTROL commands, which provide finer grained control
> + * over cache flushing.
> + */
> +struct pipe_control {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> + volatile u32 *cpu_page;
> + u32 gtt_offset;
> +};
> +
> static inline int ring_space(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> {
> int space = (ring->head & HEAD_ADDR) - (ring->tail + 8);
> @@ -123,6 +133,118 @@ render_ring_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * Emits a PIPE_CONTROL with a non-zero post-sync operation, for
> + * implementing two workarounds on gen6. From section 1.4.7.1
> + * "PIPE_CONTROL" of the Sandy Bridge PRM volume 2 part 1:
> + *
> + * [DevSNB-C+{W/A}] Before any depth stall flush (including those
> + * produced by non-pipelined state commands), software needs to first
> + * send a PIPE_CONTROL with no bits set except Post-Sync Operation !=
> + * 0.
> + *
> + * [Dev-SNB{W/A}]: Before a PIPE_CONTROL with Write Cache Flush Enable
> + * =1, a PIPE_CONTROL with any non-zero post-sync-op is required.
> + *
> + * And the workaround for these two requires this workaround first:
> + *
> + * [Dev-SNB{W/A}]: Pipe-control with CS-stall bit set must be sent
> + * BEFORE the pipe-control with a post-sync op and no write-cache
> + * flushes.
> + *
> + * And this last workaround is tricky because of the requirements on
> + * that bit. From section 1.4.7.2.3 "Stall" of the Sandy Bridge PRM
> + * volume 2 part 1:
> + *
> + * "1 of the following must also be set:
> + * - Render Target Cache Flush Enable ([12] of DW1)
> + * - Depth Cache Flush Enable ([0] of DW1)
> + * - Stall at Pixel Scoreboard ([1] of DW1)
> + * - Depth Stall ([13] of DW1)
> + * - Post-Sync Operation ([13] of DW1)
> + * - Notify Enable ([8] of DW1)"
> + *
> + * The cache flushes require the workaround flush that triggered this
> + * one, so we can't use it. Depth stall would trigger the same.
> + * Post-sync nonzero is what triggered this second workaround, so we
> + * can't use that one either. Notify enable is IRQs, which aren't
> + * really our business. That leaves only stall at scoreboard.
> + */
> +static int
> +intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> +{
> + struct pipe_control *pc = ring->private;
> + u32 scratch_addr = pc->gtt_offset + 128;
> + int ret;
> +
> +
> + ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 6);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL | 3);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
> + PIPE_CONTROL_STALL_AT_SCOREBOARD);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, scratch_addr | PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT); /* address */
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, 0); /* low dword */
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, 0); /* high dword */
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> + intel_ring_advance(ring);
> +
> + ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 6);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL | 3);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, scratch_addr | PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT); /* address */
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> + intel_ring_advance(ring);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +gen6_render_ring_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> + u32 invalidate_domains, u32 flush_domains)
> +{
> + u32 flags = 0;
> + struct pipe_control *pc = ring->private;
> + u32 scratch_addr = pc->gtt_offset + 128;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Force SNB workarounds for PIPE_CONTROL flushes */
> + intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(ring);
> +
> + /* Just flush everything. Experiments have shown that reducing the
> + * number of bits based on the write domains has little performance
> + * impact.
> + */
> + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_FLUSH;
> + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_FLUSH;
> + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_TEXTURE_CACHE_FLUSH;
> + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH;
> + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE;
> + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_CONST_CACHE_INVALIDATE;
> + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_STATE_CACHE_INVALIDATE;
I think we also want a TLB invalidate here, bit 18. This requires another
workaround before issuing this flush: We need 2 Store Data Commands (such as
MI_STORE_DATA_IMM or MI_STORE_DATA_INDEX) before sending PIPE_CONTROL w/ stall
(20) and TLB inv bit (18) set
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-04 6:02 [PATCH 1/3] i915: Remove implied length of 2 from GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL #define Kenneth Graunke
2011-10-04 6:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] i915: Rename PIPE_CONTROL bit defines to be less terse Kenneth Graunke
2011-10-04 8:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-05 5:13 ` Kenneth Graunke
2011-10-05 10:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-05 22:29 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-04 6:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use PIPE_CONTROL for flushing on gen6+ Kenneth Graunke
2011-10-05 22:57 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2011-10-05 23:36 ` Chris Wilson
2011-10-05 23:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-06 0:59 ` Eric Anholt
2011-10-06 5:15 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-06 18:00 ` Eric Anholt
2011-10-06 19:01 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-05 23:39 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-05 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] i915: Remove implied length of 2 from GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL #define Ben Widawsky
2011-10-11 11:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-11 17:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-10-11 18:39 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-11 18:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-10-11 22:17 ` Keith Packard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-11 21:41 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: " Daniel Vetter
2011-10-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use PIPE_CONTROL for flushing on gen6+ Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111005155713.6e2f0c6c@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kenneth@whitecape.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox