From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: relative_constants_mode race fix
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:35:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111013083523.GC2938@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318460182-21302-2-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:56:19PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> After my refactoring, Chris noticed that we had a bug.
>
> dev_priv keeps track of the current addressing mode that gets set at
> execbuffer time. Unfortunately the existing code was doing this before
> acquiring struct_mutex which leaves a race with another thread also
> doing an execbuffer. If that wasn't bad enough, relocate_slow drops
> struct_mutex which opens a much more likely error where another thread
> comes in and modifies the state while relocate_slow is being slow.
>
> The solution here is to just defer setting this state until we
> absolutely need it, and we know we'll have struct_mutex for the
> remainder of our code path.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 67 ++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 3693e83..0b343af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1003,39 +1003,6 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - mode = args->flags & I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
> - switch (mode) {
> - case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL:
> - case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE:
> - case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE:
> - if (ring == &dev_priv->ring[RCS] &&
> - mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 5 &&
> - mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> - intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
> - intel_ring_emit(ring, INSTPM);
> - intel_ring_emit(ring,
> - I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK << 16 | mode);
> - intel_ring_advance(ring);
> -
> - dev_priv->relative_constants_mode = mode;
> - }
> - break;
> - default:
> - DRM_ERROR("execbuf with unknown constants: %d\n", mode);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> if (args->buffer_count < 1) {
> DRM_ERROR("execbuf with %d buffers\n", args->buffer_count);
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1132,6 +1099,40 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> goto err;
> }
>
> + mode = args->flags & I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
> + switch (mode) {
> + case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL:
> + case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE:
> + case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE:
> + if (ring == &dev_priv->ring[RCS] &&
> + mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 5 &&
> + mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
> + intel_ring_emit(ring, INSTPM);
> + intel_ring_emit(ring,
> + I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK << 16 | mode);
> + intel_ring_advance(ring);
> +
> + dev_priv->relative_constants_mode = mode;
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + DRM_ERROR("execbuf with unknown constants: %d\n", mode);
> + ret -EINVAL;
This probably wont compile ;-) I'd also move this block even further down
after gem_execbuffer_move_to_gpu. It doesn't matter for correctness, but
now it's sitting in the middle of the relocation and cache domain
handling, which doesn't make sense.
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> /* Set the pending read domains for the batch buffer to COMMAND */
> if (batch_obj->base.pending_write_domain) {
> DRM_ERROR("Attempting to use self-modifying batch buffer\n");
> --
> 1.7.7
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-13 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-12 4:43 [PATCH 0/5] execbuffer cleanups + fixes Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 4:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: execbuffer simplification Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 4:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: extract constant offset setting Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 16:46 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 4:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: make eb structure do more Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 4:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: relative_constants_mode race fix Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 4:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Force sync command ordering (Gen6+) Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 8:01 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 9:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-12 16:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] execbuffer cleanups + fixes Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 22:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] pre-v2 series Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 22:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: relative_constants_mode race fix Ben Widawsky
2011-10-13 8:35 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2011-10-13 17:25 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 22:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Force sync command ordering (Gen6+) Ben Widawsky
2011-10-13 8:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-12 22:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: extract constant offset setting Ben Widawsky
2011-10-13 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-13 17:14 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-10-12 22:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Use eb for more stuff Ben Widawsky
2011-10-13 8:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-13 12:00 ` Chris Wilson
2011-10-13 12:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2011-10-13 17:31 ` Ben Widawsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-13 3:21 [PATCH 0/4] patches for -next Ben Widawsky
2011-12-13 3:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: relative_constants_mode race fix Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111013083523.GC2938@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox