public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove combination mode for backlight control, again
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:48:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121114084807.330431fb@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b608bee1d5a0c45f909f1f6eebcd410.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl>

On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:29:11 +0200
"Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu> wrote:

> On Tue, August 28, 2012 16:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:39:34PM +0200, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> >> Some backlight problems on GEN4 can be solved by not fiddling with the
> >> backlight. The current code sets the backlight to 0 to disable the panel
> >> (last year anyway, maybe the code changed), but on gen >= 4 it can do the
> >> same by clearing bit 31 in BLC_PWM_CLT2. That way the original backlight
> >> value doesn't need to be saved anywhere.
> >
> > A while back I've improved the backlight code to properly switch the pipe
> > that controls the pwm and also to properly toggle the enable bit for
> > gen4+, see the new intel_panel_enable_backlight functions. Would it be
> > correct in your opinion to simply ditch the call to
> > intel_panel_actually_set_backlight for gen4+ unconditionally? Same for
> > intel_panel_disable_backlight obviously?
> 
> Yes, that seems the whole point of having the PWM disable bit.
> 
> I would also ditch the backlight_enabled state tracking, as it's
> unnecessary and incorrect because the enable/disable calls aren't
> balanced.
> 
> I'll update my kernel to the latest git code and try out how the
> current code works and if not touching LBPC at all works for gen 2
> hardware. If it doesn't then LBPC needs to be saved/restored in
> i915_suspend.c after all.
> 
> It would be nice if backlight control worked with ASLE disabled,
> that would get rid of all complexity, including combination mode.
> Or alternatively, if disabling combination mode at boot works then
> we can get rid of the complicated brightness setting code to cope
> with it.

Did we bottom out on this discussion?  Reading through the thread I
don't see any firm conclusions, and we definitely still have bugs open
that may be resolved by this incorrect patchset...

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-14 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28  6:53 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: backlight fixes and cleanup Jani Nikula
2012-08-28  6:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: save/restore the legacy backlight control Jani Nikula
2012-08-28  7:16   ` Chris Wilson
2012-08-28  7:48     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-28 13:56   ` Indan Zupancic
2012-08-28 14:14     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-28 14:49       ` Indan Zupancic
2012-08-28 15:15         ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-30  8:32           ` Indan Zupancic
2012-08-30  8:50             ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-28  6:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove combination mode for backlight control, again Jani Nikula
2012-08-28 14:39   ` Indan Zupancic
2012-08-28 14:55     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-30  9:29       ` Indan Zupancic
2012-11-14 16:48         ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2012-08-28  6:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: remove brightness inversion quirk for acer aspire 5734z Jani Nikula
2012-08-28  6:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: remove module parameter and quirk for inverting brightness Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121114084807.330431fb@jbarnes-desktop \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox