From: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: save/restore the legacy backlight control
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:49:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f206dd76bb01291ea6740c90ac392cc.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120828141438.GC5125@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, August 28, 2012 16:14, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:56:31PM +0200, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, August 28, 2012 08:53, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> >
>> > This is a prep patch to stop drm/i915 from changing the LBPC registers
>> > itself - but we still need to properly save/restore it on
>> > suspend/resume.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> > ---
[...]
>> It seems weird that LBPC wouldn't be restored during resume by some BIOSes,
>> is this really necessary?
>
> ba3820ade317ee36e496b9b40d2ec3987dd4aef0 claims so. But that commit
> managed to put too many things into the same thing unfortunately.
Is that the right SHA? Because that just reverts my combination mode
removal patch. Assuming it is the right commit, then I think it's
incorrect in saying that it caused backlight dimming problems after
resume. That particular problem was caused by a bogus shift. The
problems caused by removing the mode was a lower max brightness
and/or less brightness levels.
By the way, saving LBPC only makes sense if it's done before it was
set to 0 to disable the panel. I don't know if the current code does
the right thing, I haven't looked at it for a while.
Greetings,
Indan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-28 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 6:53 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: backlight fixes and cleanup Jani Nikula
2012-08-28 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: save/restore the legacy backlight control Jani Nikula
2012-08-28 7:16 ` Chris Wilson
2012-08-28 7:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-28 13:56 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-08-28 14:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-28 14:49 ` Indan Zupancic [this message]
2012-08-28 15:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-30 8:32 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-08-30 8:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-28 6:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove combination mode for backlight control, again Jani Nikula
2012-08-28 14:39 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-08-28 14:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-08-30 9:29 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-11-14 16:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2012-08-28 6:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: remove brightness inversion quirk for acer aspire 5734z Jani Nikula
2012-08-28 6:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: remove module parameter and quirk for inverting brightness Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f206dd76bb01291ea6740c90ac392cc.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl \
--to=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox