Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: fix lost FP_CB_TUNE setting for pch plls
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:47:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130406174726.GH2228@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGRQP9cSwrwk1xZ497p_5wKJpEi=6N7o+h+qzEJ=9RjctA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:52:28PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Hi
> 
> 2013/4/4 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>:
> > commit de13a2e3f88a4da8e85063b6de37096795079e41
> > Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Date:   Thu Sep 20 18:36:05 2012 -0300
> >
> >     drm/i915: extract compute_dpll from ironlake_crtc_mode_set
> >
> > missed the subtle adjustment of the FP1 register. Fix this up by
> > passing a pointer around instead of the value.
> 
> We could also move the whole chunk that sets "factor" and "FP_CB_TUNE"
> back to ironlake_crtc_mode_set or even to a brand new
> ironlake_calculate_fp(intel_crtc, clock, has_reduced_clock,
> reduced_clock, &fp, &fp2). Maybe as a follow-up patch since this
> version is way much easier for -stable.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

All patches merged, thanks for the review. I didn't add a cc: stable to
this one, since no one has reported a regression yet. We can easily
backport if that changes.

I agree with your refactor idea, but until all the clock handling has
settled a bit (due to the massive pipe config reorganisation) I think we
should hold and not waste too much time with beauty-ops ;-)

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

      reply	other threads:[~2013-04-06 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-04 20:20 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: fix lost FP_CB_TUNE setting for pch plls Daniel Vetter
2013-04-04 20:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: fix FP CB tuning limits for lvds Daniel Vetter
2013-04-05 20:24   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-04-04 20:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: set CB tuning also for the reduce clock Daniel Vetter
2013-04-05 20:47   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-04-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: fix lost FP_CB_TUNE setting for pch plls Paulo Zanoni
2013-04-06 17:47   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130406174726.GH2228@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox