From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: bradley.d.volkin@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140512165053.GR25056@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399756313-31041-1-git-send-email-bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 02:11:53PM -0700, bradley.d.volkin@intel.com wrote:
> From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
>
> The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this
> bit is not required for the actual test case.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76670
> Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
> ---
>
> This is a resend of
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-April/043223.html
>
> There was initially some discussion as to the fact that the test was
> written to reflect the implementation of a workaround in the ddx and
> whether this patch lead to a deviation between the two. There was no
> real closure on that discussion, however, I don't believe the
> MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM aspect of the test is relevant to the ddx code,
> so I'd like to move forward with this or get clear direction on the
> preferred solution.
Afaik Chris agreed that we've never shipped with this, so changing it is
ok. If we're proven wrong we can look at this again. Patch merged to igt,
thanks.
-Daniel
>
> tests/gen7_forcewake_mt.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gen7_forcewake_mt.c b/tests/gen7_forcewake_mt.c
> index fdc34ce..3afd80a 100644
> --- a/tests/gen7_forcewake_mt.c
> +++ b/tests/gen7_forcewake_mt.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void *thread(void *arg)
> }
>
> #define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM (0x22<<23)
> -#define MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM (0x24<<23| 1<<22)
> +#define MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM (0x24<<23)
>
> igt_simple_main
> {
> @@ -140,8 +140,9 @@ igt_simple_main
> sleep(2);
>
> for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
> + uint32_t *p;
> struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
> - struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 exec;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 exec[2];
> struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc[2];
> uint32_t b[] = {
> MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM | 1,
> @@ -149,54 +150,56 @@ igt_simple_main
> 2 << 16 | 2,
> MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM | 1,
> FORCEWAKE_MT,
> - 5*sizeof(uint32_t),
> + 0, // to be patched
> MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM | 1,
> FORCEWAKE_MT,
> 2 << 16,
> MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM | 1,
> FORCEWAKE_MT,
> - 11*sizeof(uint32_t),
> + 1 * sizeof(uint32_t), // to be patched
> MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
> 0
> };
>
> - memset(&exec, 0, sizeof(exec));
> - exec.handle = gem_create(t[0].fd, 4096);
> - exec.relocation_count = 2;
> - exec.relocs_ptr = (uintptr_t)reloc;
> - //exec.flags = EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_GTT;
> - gem_write(t[0].fd, exec.handle, 0, b, sizeof(b));
> + memset(exec, 0, sizeof(exec));
> + exec[1].handle = gem_create(t[0].fd, 4096);
> + exec[1].relocation_count = 2;
> + exec[1].relocs_ptr = (uintptr_t)reloc;
> + gem_write(t[0].fd, exec[1].handle, 0, b, sizeof(b));
> + exec[0].handle = gem_create(t[0].fd, 4096);
>
> reloc[0].offset = 5 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> - reloc[0].delta = 5 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> - reloc[0].target_handle = exec.handle;
> - reloc[0].read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
> - reloc[0].write_domain = 0;
> + reloc[0].delta = 0;
> + reloc[0].target_handle = exec[0].handle;
> + reloc[0].read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
> + reloc[0].write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
> reloc[0].presumed_offset = 0;
>
> reloc[1].offset = 11 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> - reloc[1].delta = 11 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> - reloc[1].target_handle = exec.handle;
> - reloc[1].read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION;
> - reloc[1].write_domain = 0;
> + reloc[1].delta = 1 * sizeof(uint32_t);
> + reloc[1].target_handle = exec[0].handle;
> + reloc[1].read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
> + reloc[1].write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
> reloc[1].presumed_offset = 0;
>
> memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf));
> execbuf.buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t)&exec;
> - execbuf.buffer_count = 1;
> + execbuf.buffer_count = 2;
> execbuf.batch_len = sizeof(b);
> execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_SECURE;
>
> gem_execbuf(t[0].fd, &execbuf);
> - gem_sync(t[0].fd, exec.handle);
> - gem_read(t[0].fd, exec.handle, 0, b, sizeof(b));
> - gem_close(t[0].fd, exec.handle);
> + gem_sync(t[0].fd, exec[1].handle);
>
> - printf("[%d]={ %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x }\n",
> - i, b[0], b[1], b[2], b[3], b[4], b[5], b[6], b[7], b[8], b[9], b[10], b[11], b[12]);
> + p = gem_mmap(t[0].fd, exec[0].handle, 4096, PROT_READ);
>
> - igt_assert(b[5] & 2);
> - igt_assert((b[11] & 2) == 0);
> + printf("[%d]={ %08x %08x }\n", i, p[0], p[1]);
> + igt_assert(p[0] & 2);
> + igt_assert((p[1] & 2) == 0);
> +
> + munmap(p, 4096);
> + gem_close(t[0].fd, exec[0].handle);
> + gem_close(t[0].fd, exec[1].handle);
>
> usleep(1000);
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-10 21:11 [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command bradley.d.volkin
2014-05-12 16:50 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-08 21:22 bradley.d.volkin
2014-04-09 6:20 ` Chris Wilson
2014-04-09 13:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-09 15:12 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-04-09 16:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-22 16:45 ` Volkin, Bradley D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140512165053.GR25056@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=bradley.d.volkin@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox