Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/7] drm/i915: move VBT based eDP port check to intel_bios.c
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:43:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316154357.GW14170@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458125015-7931-3-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:43:31PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hide knowledge about VBT child devices in intel_bios.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Patches 2&3: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h   |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c   | 21 +--------------------
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 5fb7a22e802b..c6ec7029f691 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3336,6 +3336,7 @@ int intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size);
>  bool intel_bios_is_tv_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin);
> +bool intel_bios_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port);
>  
>  /* intel_opregion.c */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index 4f7eba36a849..7f61ca8165f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1522,3 +1522,36 @@ bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin)
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_bios_is_port_edp - is the device in given port eDP
> + * @dev_priv:	i915 device instance
> + * @port:	port to check
> + *
> + * Return true if the device in %port is eDP.
> + */
> +bool intel_bios_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
> +{
> +	union child_device_config *p_child;
> +	static const short port_mapping[] = {
> +		[PORT_B] = DVO_PORT_DPB,
> +		[PORT_C] = DVO_PORT_DPC,
> +		[PORT_D] = DVO_PORT_DPD,
> +		[PORT_E] = DVO_PORT_DPE,
> +	};
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
> +		p_child = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
> +
> +		if (p_child->common.dvo_port == port_mapping[port] &&
> +		    (p_child->common.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_eDP_BITS) ==
> +		    (DEVICE_TYPE_eDP & DEVICE_TYPE_eDP_BITS))
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 0e326e776e8f..2f8ce53df9cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4990,14 +4990,6 @@ put_power:
>  bool intel_dp_is_edp(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	union child_device_config *p_child;
> -	int i;
> -	static const short port_mapping[] = {
> -		[PORT_B] = DVO_PORT_DPB,
> -		[PORT_C] = DVO_PORT_DPC,
> -		[PORT_D] = DVO_PORT_DPD,
> -		[PORT_E] = DVO_PORT_DPE,
> -	};
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * eDP not supported on g4x. so bail out early just
> @@ -5009,18 +5001,7 @@ bool intel_dp_is_edp(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port)
>  	if (port == PORT_A)
>  		return true;
>  
> -	if (!dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
> -		p_child = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
> -
> -		if (p_child->common.dvo_port == port_mapping[port] &&
> -		    (p_child->common.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_eDP_BITS) ==
> -		    (DEVICE_TYPE_eDP & DEVICE_TYPE_eDP_BITS))
> -			return true;
> -	}
> -	return false;
> +	return intel_bios_is_port_edp(dev_priv, port);
>  }
>  
>  void
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-16 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-16 10:43 [PATCH RESEND 1/7] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 10:43 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/7] drm/i915: move VBT based LVDS " Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 10:43 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/7] drm/i915: move VBT based eDP port " Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 15:43   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-03-16 10:43 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/7] drm/i915: move VBT based DSI presence " Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 15:47   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-16 10:43 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/7] drm/i915/panel: setup pwm backlight based on connector type Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 15:48   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-16 10:43 ` [PATCH RESEND 6/7] drm/i915/bios: drop has_mipi in favor of intel_bios_is_dsi_present Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 15:50   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-16 16:32     ` Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 10:43 ` [PATCH RESEND 7/7] drm/i915: hide away VBT private data in a separate header Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 15:51   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-03-17 10:04     ` Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 13:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [RESEND,1/7] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Patchwork
2016-03-16 15:42 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/7] " Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160316154357.GW14170@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox