public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Extract check_luts()
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:41:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190320144131.GL3888@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319215938.GT4773@mdroper-desk.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:59:38PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:13:08PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > In prepartion for per-platform color_check() functions extract the
> > common code into a separate function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> > index 467fd1a1630c..b6a992a5b14f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> > @@ -771,6 +771,38 @@ static int check_lut_size(const struct drm_property_blob *lut, int expected)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int check_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
> > +	const struct drm_property_blob *gamma_lut = crtc_state->base.gamma_lut;
> > +	const struct drm_property_blob *degamma_lut = crtc_state->base.degamma_lut;
> > +	int gamma_length, degamma_length;
> > +	u32 gamma_tests, degamma_tests;
> > +
> > +	/* Always allow legacy gamma LUT with no further checking. */
> > +	if (crtc_state_is_legacy_gamma(crtc_state))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/* C8 needs the legacy LUT all to itself */
> > +	if (crtc_state->c8_planes)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Do we need to test for non-NULL gamma_lut here?

For c8? We already checked crtc_state_is_legacy_gamma() above.

> 
> The logic is the same as before your patch, so either we already had a
> pre-existing bug or, more likely, I'm overlooking something obvious.
> 
> > +
> > +	degamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_size;
> > +	gamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
> > +	degamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_tests;
> > +	gamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_tests;
> > +
> > +	if (check_lut_size(degamma_lut, degamma_length) ||
> > +	    check_lut_size(gamma_lut, gamma_length))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (drm_color_lut_check(degamma_lut, degamma_tests) ||
> > +	    drm_color_lut_check(gamma_lut, gamma_tests))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static u32 chv_cgm_mode(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	u32 cgm_mode = 0;
> > @@ -794,19 +826,11 @@ int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  	const struct drm_property_blob *gamma_lut = crtc_state->base.gamma_lut;
> >  	const struct drm_property_blob *degamma_lut = crtc_state->base.degamma_lut;
> >  	bool limited_color_range = false;
> > -	int gamma_length, degamma_length;
> > -	u32 gamma_tests, degamma_tests;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	degamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_size;
> > -	gamma_length = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
> > -	degamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.degamma_lut_tests;
> > -	gamma_tests = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_tests;
> > -
> > -	/* C8 needs the legacy LUT all to itself */
> > -	if (crtc_state->c8_planes &&
> > -	    !crtc_state_is_legacy_gamma(crtc_state))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +	ret = check_luts(crtc_state);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> >  
> >  	crtc_state->gamma_enable = (gamma_lut || degamma_lut) &&
> >  		!crtc_state->c8_planes;
> > @@ -828,25 +852,10 @@ int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  	if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> >  		crtc_state->cgm_mode = chv_cgm_mode(crtc_state);
> >  
> > -	/* Always allow legacy gamma LUT with no further checking. */
> >  	if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable ||
> > -	    crtc_state_is_legacy_gamma(crtc_state)) {
> > +	    crtc_state_is_legacy_gamma(crtc_state))
> >  		crtc_state->gamma_mode = GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT;
> > -		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 &&
> > -		    crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> > -			crtc_state->gamma_mode |= POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE;
> > -		return 0;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	if (check_lut_size(degamma_lut, degamma_length) ||
> > -	    check_lut_size(gamma_lut, gamma_length))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -	if (drm_color_lut_check(degamma_lut, degamma_tests) ||
> > -	    drm_color_lut_check(gamma_lut, gamma_tests))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > +	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> >  		crtc_state->gamma_mode = GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT |
> >  					 PRE_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE |
> >  					 POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE;
> 
> Should we drop the GAMMA_ENABLE here and just rely on the new check
> you're adding below to handle it?

This will get rewritten entirely in following patches, so I figured I'd
just keep this patch minimal.

> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> > @@ -858,6 +867,9 @@ int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  		crtc_state->gamma_mode = GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT;
> >  
> >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > +		if (crtc_state->gamma_enable)
> > +			crtc_state->gamma_mode |= POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE;
> > +
> >  		if (crtc_state->output_format != INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB ||
> >  		    crtc_state->limited_color_range)
> >  			crtc_state->csc_mode |= ICL_OUTPUT_CSC_ENABLE;
> > -- 
> > 2.19.2
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
> Intel Corporation
> (916) 356-2795

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-20 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18 16:13 [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: Clean up intel_color_check() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Extract check_luts() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-19 16:24   ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-20 14:46     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-19 21:59   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-20 14:41     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-03-20 15:14       ` Matt Roper
2019-03-20 15:31         ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-20 22:48           ` Matt Roper
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Turn intel_color_check() into a vfunc Ville Syrjala
2019-03-19 21:59   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Extract i9xx_color_check() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-19 22:00   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Extract chv_color_check() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-19 22:00   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-20 14:43     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Extract icl_color_check() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Extract glk_color_check() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Extract bdw_color_check() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-20 22:49   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Extract ilk_color_check() Ville Syrjala
2019-03-20 22:49   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-21 10:05     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Drop the pointless linear legacy LUT load on CHV Ville Syrjala
2019-03-20 22:50   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Skip the linear degamma LUT load on ICL+ Ville Syrjala
2019-03-20 22:50   ` Matt Roper
2019-03-18 20:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Clean up intel_color_check() Patchwork
2019-03-18 20:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-03-19  9:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-03-19 16:26 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Jani Nikula
2019-03-19 16:31   ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190320144131.GL3888@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox