public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/37] drm/i915/region: support continuous allocations
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 23:26:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809222643.23142-5-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809222643.23142-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>

Some objects may need to be allocated as a continuous block, thinking
ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem to expect it.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h  |   4 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.c    |  10 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h    |   3 +-
 .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c  | 152 +++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c  |   5 +-
 5 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
index 5e2fa37e9bc0..eb92243d473b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
@@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
 
 	I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(struct list_head st_link);
 
+	unsigned long flags;
+#define I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS BIT(0)
+#define I915_BO_ALLOC_FLAGS (I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS)
+
 	/*
 	 * Is the object to be mapped as read-only to the GPU
 	 * Only honoured if hardware has relevant pte bit
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.c
index be126e70c90f..d9cd722b5dbf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.c
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_buddy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
+	if (obj->flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS)
+		flags = I915_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS;
+
 	ret = __intel_memory_region_get_pages_buddy(mem, size, flags, blocks);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_free_sg;
@@ -98,10 +101,12 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_buddy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 }
 
 void i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
-					struct intel_memory_region *mem)
+					struct intel_memory_region *mem,
+					unsigned long flags)
 {
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->mm.blocks);
 	obj->mm.region= mem;
+	obj->flags = flags;
 
 	mutex_lock(&mem->obj_lock);
 	list_add(&obj->mm.region_link, &mem->objects);
@@ -125,6 +130,9 @@ i915_gem_object_create_region(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
 	if (!mem)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 
+	if (flags & ~I915_BO_ALLOC_FLAGS)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
 	size = round_up(size, mem->min_page_size);
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!size);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h
index ebddc86d78f7..f2ff6f8bff74 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.h
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ void i915_gem_object_put_pages_buddy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 				     struct sg_table *pages);
 
 void i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
-					struct intel_memory_region *mem);
+					struct intel_memory_region *mem,
+					unsigned long flags);
 void i915_gem_object_release_memory_region(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 
 struct drm_i915_gem_object *
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
index 2f13e4c1d999..70b467d4e811 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
@@ -81,17 +81,17 @@ static int igt_mock_fill(void *arg)
 
 static void igt_mark_evictable(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
-	i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
+	if (i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj))
+		i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
 	obj->mm.madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
 	list_move(&obj->mm.region_link, &obj->mm.region->purgeable);
 }
 
-static int igt_mock_shrink(void *arg)
+static int igt_frag_region(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
+			   struct list_head *objects)
 {
-	struct intel_memory_region *mem = arg;
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 	unsigned long n_objects;
-	LIST_HEAD(objects);
 	resource_size_t target;
 	resource_size_t total;
 	int err = 0;
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int igt_mock_shrink(void *arg)
 			goto err_close_objects;
 		}
 
-		list_add(&obj->st_link, &objects);
+		list_add(&obj->st_link, objects);
 
 		err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
 		if (err)
@@ -123,6 +123,39 @@ static int igt_mock_shrink(void *arg)
 			igt_mark_evictable(obj);
 	}
 
+	return 0;
+
+err_close_objects:
+	close_objects(objects);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void igt_defrag_region(struct list_head *objects)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(obj, objects, st_link) {
+		if (obj->mm.madv == I915_MADV_WILLNEED)
+			igt_mark_evictable(obj);
+	}
+}
+
+static int igt_mock_shrink(void *arg)
+{
+	struct intel_memory_region *mem = arg;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	LIST_HEAD(objects);
+	resource_size_t target;
+	resource_size_t total;
+	int err;
+
+	err = igt_frag_region(mem, &objects);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	total = resource_size(&mem->region);
+	target = mem->mm.chunk_size;
+
 	while (target <= total / 2) {
 		obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mem, target, 0);
 		if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
@@ -154,11 +187,120 @@ static int igt_mock_shrink(void *arg)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int igt_mock_continuous(void *arg)
+{
+	struct intel_memory_region *mem = arg;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	LIST_HEAD(objects);
+	resource_size_t target;
+	resource_size_t total;
+	int err;
+
+	err = igt_frag_region(mem, &objects);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	total = resource_size(&mem->region);
+	target = total / 2;
+
+	/*
+	 * Sanity check that we can allocate all of the available fragmented
+	 * space.
+	 */
+	obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mem, target, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	list_add(&obj->st_link, &objects);
+
+	err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("failed to allocate available space\n");
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	igt_mark_evictable(obj);
+
+	/* Try the smallest possible size -- should succeed */
+	obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mem, mem->mm.chunk_size,
+					    I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	list_add(&obj->st_link, &objects);
+
+	err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("failed to allocate smallest possible size\n");
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	igt_mark_evictable(obj);
+
+	if (obj->mm.pages->nents != 1) {
+		pr_err("[1]object spans multiple sg entries\n");
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Even though there is enough free space for the allocation, we
+	 * shouldn't be able to allocate it, given that it is fragmented, and
+	 * non-continuous.
+	 */
+	obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mem, target, I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	list_add(&obj->st_link, &objects);
+
+	err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+	if (!err) {
+		pr_err("expected allocation to fail\n");
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	igt_defrag_region(&objects);
+
+	/* Should now succeed */
+	obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mem, target, I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	list_add(&obj->st_link, &objects);
+
+	err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("failed to allocate from defraged area\n");
+		goto err_close_objects;
+	}
+
+	if (obj->mm.pages->nents != 1) {
+		pr_err("object spans multiple sg entries\n");
+		err = -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+err_close_objects:
+	close_objects(&objects);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 int intel_memory_region_mock_selftests(void)
 {
 	static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_fill),
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_shrink),
+		SUBTEST(igt_mock_continuous),
 	};
 	struct intel_memory_region *mem;
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c
index cc97250dca62..d73f37712c44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ mock_object_create(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 	unsigned int cache_level;
 
+	if (flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS)
+		size = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
+
 	if (size > BIT(mem->mm.max_order) * mem->mm.chunk_size)
 		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
 
@@ -38,7 +41,7 @@ mock_object_create(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
 	cache_level = HAS_LLC(i915) ? I915_CACHE_LLC : I915_CACHE_NONE;
 	i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, cache_level);
 
-	i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mem);
+	i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mem, flags);
 
 	return obj;
 }
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-09 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-09 22:26 [PATCH v3 00/37] Introduce memory region concept (including device local memory) Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/37] drm/i915: buddy allocator Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/37] drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region Matthew Auld
2019-08-10  9:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/37] drm/i915/region: support basic eviction Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:18   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-11  5:59     ` Tang, CQ
2019-08-09 22:26 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2019-08-10 10:22   ` [PATCH v3 04/37] drm/i915/region: support continuous allocations Chris Wilson
2019-08-13 19:17   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/37] drm/i915/region: support volatile objects Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:25   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-08-10 10:26   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/37] drm/i915: Add memory region information to device_info Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:28   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/37] drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:37   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/37] drm/i915: setup io-mapping for LMEM Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/37] drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mapping Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/37] drm/i915/blt: don't assume pinned intel_context Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 11/37] drm/i915/blt: bump size restriction Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 12/37] drm/i915/blt: support copying objects Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:45   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 13/37] drm/i915/selftests: move gpu-write-dw into utils Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:45   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 14/37] drm/i915/selftests: add write-dword test for LMEM Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 15/37] drm/i915/selftest: extend coverage to include LMEM huge-pages Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 16/37] drm/i915/lmem: support CPU relocations Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 17/37] drm/i915/lmem: support pread Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 18/37] drm/i915/lmem: support pwrite Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 19/37] drm/i915: enumerate and init each supported region Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 10:54   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 20/37] drm/i915: treat shmem as a region Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 21/37] drm/i915: treat stolen " Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 22/37] drm/i915: define HAS_MAPPABLE_APERTURE Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 23/37] drm/i915: do not map aperture if it is not available Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:02   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 24/37] drm/i915: set num_fence_regs to 0 if there is no aperture Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:46   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-13 21:22     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 25/37] drm/i915/selftests: check for missing aperture Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 26/37] drm/i915: error capture with no ggtt slot Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:11   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 27/37] drm/i915: Don't try to place HWS in non-existing mappable region Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:14   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 28/37] drm/i915: check for missing aperture in insert_mappable_node Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:15   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 29/37] drm/i915: Allow i915 to manage the vma offset nodes instead of drm core Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:28   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 30/37] drm/i915: Introduce DRM_I915_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:32   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 31/37] drm/i915/lmem: add helper to get CPU accessible offset Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 32/37] drm/i915: Add cpu and lmem fault handlers Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:38   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 33/37] drm/i915: cpu-map based dumb buffers Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:44   ` Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 34/37] drm/i915: support basic object migration Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:45   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 35/37] drm/i915: Introduce GEM_OBJECT_SETPARAM with I915_PARAM_MEMORY_REGION Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:54   ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-01  6:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Niranjan Vishwanathapura
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 36/37] drm/i915/query: Expose memory regions through the query uAPI Matthew Auld
2019-08-10 11:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-08-09 22:26 ` [PATCH v3 37/37] HAX drm/i915: add the fake lmem region Matthew Auld
2019-08-09 22:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce memory region concept (including device local memory) (rev3) Patchwork
2019-08-09 23:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-08-09 23:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-08-13 19:20 ` [PATCH v3 00/37] Introduce memory region concept (including device local memory) Dave Airlie
2019-09-12 13:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2019-09-13  9:55     ` Dave Airlie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190809222643.23142-5-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox