* [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5.
@ 2019-09-25 8:21 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-09-25 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add hardware readout for FEC Maarten Lankhorst
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2019-09-25 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Maarten Lankhorst, stable, Manasi Navare
There was a integer wraparound when mode_clock became too high,
and we didn't correct for the FEC overhead factor when dividing,
with the calculations breaking at HBR3.
As a result our calculated bpp was way too high, and the link width
limitation never came into effect.
Print out the resulting bpp calcululations as a sanity check, just
in case we ever have to debug it later on again.
We also used the wrong factor for FEC. While bspec mentions 2.4%,
all the calculations use 1/0.972261, and the same ratio should be
applied to data M/N as well, so use it there when FEC is enabled.
This fixes the FIFO underrun we are seeing with FEC enabled.
Changes since v2:
- Handle fec_enable in intel_link_compute_m_n, so only data M/N is adjusted. (Ville)
- Fix initial hardware readout for FEC. (Ville)
Changes since v3:
- Remove bogus fec_to_mode_clock. (Ville)
Changes since v4:
- Use the correct register for icl. (Ville)
- Split hw readout to a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: d9218c8f6cf4 ("drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for Compressed BPP and Slice Count for DSC")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 184 ++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 5ecf54270181..c4c9286be987 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -7291,7 +7291,7 @@ static int ironlake_fdi_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
pipe_config->fdi_lanes = lane;
intel_link_compute_m_n(pipe_config->pipe_bpp, lane, fdi_dotclock,
- link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false);
+ link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false, false);
ret = ironlake_check_fdi_lanes(dev, intel_crtc->pipe, pipe_config);
if (ret == -EDEADLK)
@@ -7538,11 +7538,15 @@ void
intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bits_per_pixel, int nlanes,
int pixel_clock, int link_clock,
struct intel_link_m_n *m_n,
- bool constant_n)
+ bool constant_n, bool fec_enable)
{
- m_n->tu = 64;
+ u32 data_clock = bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock;
+
+ if (fec_enable)
+ data_clock = intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(data_clock);
- compute_m_n(bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock,
+ m_n->tu = 64;
+ compute_m_n(data_clock,
link_clock * nlanes * 8,
&m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n,
constant_n);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
index 5cea6f8e107a..4b9e18e5a263 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ enum phy_fia {
void intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bpp, int nlanes,
int pixel_clock, int link_clock,
struct intel_link_m_n *m_n,
- bool constant_n);
+ bool constant_n, bool fec_enable);
bool is_ccs_modifier(u64 modifier);
void lpt_disable_clkout_dp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
u32 intel_plane_fb_max_stride(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 829559f97440..2b1e71f992b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@
#define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0 340000
#define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1 400000
-/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = (100 - 2.4)/100 */
-#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 976
+/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = 1/(0.972261) */
+#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 972261
/* Compliance test status bits */
#define INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_SHIFT_MASK 0
@@ -492,6 +492,97 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
return 0;
}
+u32 intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(u32 mode_clock)
+{
+ return div_u64(mul_u32_u32(mode_clock, 1000000U),
+ DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR);
+}
+
+static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
+ u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay)
+{
+ u32 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Available Link Bandwidth(Kbits/sec) = (NumberOfLanes)*
+ * (LinkSymbolClock)* 8 * (TimeSlotsPerMTP)
+ * for SST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP is 1,
+ * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated
+ */
+ bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8) /
+ intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max link bpp: %u\n", bits_per_pixel);
+
+ /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
+ max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER / mode_hdisplay;
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max small joiner bpp: %u\n", max_bpp_small_joiner_ram);
+
+ /*
+ * Greatest allowed DSC BPP = MIN (output BPP from available Link BW
+ * check, output bpp from small joiner RAM check)
+ */
+ bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram);
+
+ /* Error out if the max bpp is less than smallest allowed valid bpp */
+ if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[0]) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported BPP %u, min %u\n",
+ bits_per_pixel, valid_dsc_bpp[0]);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Find the nearest match in the array of known BPPs from VESA */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp) - 1; i++) {
+ if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[i + 1])
+ break;
+ }
+ bits_per_pixel = valid_dsc_bpp[i];
+
+ /*
+ * Compressed BPP in U6.4 format so multiply by 16, for Gen 11,
+ * fractional part is 0
+ */
+ return bits_per_pixel << 4;
+}
+
+static u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+ int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay)
+{
+ u8 min_slice_count, i;
+ int max_slice_width;
+
+ if (mode_clock <= DP_DSC_PEAK_PIXEL_RATE)
+ min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock,
+ DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0);
+ else
+ min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock,
+ DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1);
+
+ max_slice_width = drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_width(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd);
+ if (max_slice_width < DP_DSC_MIN_SLICE_WIDTH_VALUE) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported slice width %d by DP DSC Sink device\n",
+ max_slice_width);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ /* Also take into account max slice width */
+ min_slice_count = min_t(u8, min_slice_count,
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_hdisplay,
+ max_slice_width));
+
+ /* Find the closest match to the valid slice count values */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_slicecount); i++) {
+ if (valid_dsc_slicecount[i] >
+ drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd,
+ false))
+ break;
+ if (min_slice_count <= valid_dsc_slicecount[i])
+ return valid_dsc_slicecount[i];
+ }
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported Slice Count %d\n", min_slice_count);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static enum drm_mode_status
intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
struct drm_display_mode *mode)
@@ -2259,7 +2350,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
pipe_config->port_clock,
&pipe_config->dp_m_n,
- constant_n);
+ constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
if (intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode != NULL &&
dev_priv->drrs.type == SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
@@ -2269,7 +2360,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode->clock,
pipe_config->port_clock,
&pipe_config->dp_m2_n2,
- constant_n);
+ constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
}
if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
@@ -4373,91 +4464,6 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *sink_irq_vector)
DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN;
}
-u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(int link_clock, u8 lane_count,
- int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay)
-{
- u16 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
- int i;
-
- /*
- * Available Link Bandwidth(Kbits/sec) = (NumberOfLanes)*
- * (LinkSymbolClock)* 8 * ((100-FECOverhead)/100)*(TimeSlotsPerMTP)
- * FECOverhead = 2.4%, for SST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP is 1,
- * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated
- */
- bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8 *
- DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR) /
- mode_clock;
-
- /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
- max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER /
- mode_hdisplay;
-
- /*
- * Greatest allowed DSC BPP = MIN (output BPP from avaialble Link BW
- * check, output bpp from small joiner RAM check)
- */
- bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram);
-
- /* Error out if the max bpp is less than smallest allowed valid bpp */
- if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[0]) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported BPP %d\n", bits_per_pixel);
- return 0;
- }
-
- /* Find the nearest match in the array of known BPPs from VESA */
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp) - 1; i++) {
- if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[i + 1])
- break;
- }
- bits_per_pixel = valid_dsc_bpp[i];
-
- /*
- * Compressed BPP in U6.4 format so multiply by 16, for Gen 11,
- * fractional part is 0
- */
- return bits_per_pixel << 4;
-}
-
-u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
- int mode_clock,
- int mode_hdisplay)
-{
- u8 min_slice_count, i;
- int max_slice_width;
-
- if (mode_clock <= DP_DSC_PEAK_PIXEL_RATE)
- min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock,
- DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0);
- else
- min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock,
- DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1);
-
- max_slice_width = drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_width(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd);
- if (max_slice_width < DP_DSC_MIN_SLICE_WIDTH_VALUE) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported slice width %d by DP DSC Sink device\n",
- max_slice_width);
- return 0;
- }
- /* Also take into account max slice width */
- min_slice_count = min_t(u8, min_slice_count,
- DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_hdisplay,
- max_slice_width));
-
- /* Find the closest match to the valid slice count values */
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_slicecount); i++) {
- if (valid_dsc_slicecount[i] >
- drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd,
- false))
- break;
- if (min_slice_count <= valid_dsc_slicecount[i])
- return valid_dsc_slicecount[i];
- }
-
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported Slice Count %d\n", min_slice_count);
- return 0;
-}
-
static void
intel_pixel_encoding_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
index e01d1f89409d..a194b5b6da05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
@@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ bool intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
bool intel_dp_source_supports_hbr3(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
bool
intel_dp_get_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *link_status);
-u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(int link_clock, u8 lane_count,
- int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay);
-u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int mode_clock,
- int mode_hdisplay);
bool intel_dp_read_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
bool intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
@@ -119,4 +115,6 @@ static inline unsigned int intel_dp_unused_lane_mask(int lane_count)
return ~((1 << lane_count) - 1) & 0xf;
}
+u32 intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(u32 mode_clock);
+
#endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index eeeb3f933aa4..cf4d851a5139 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
crtc_state->port_clock,
&crtc_state->dp_m_n,
- constant_n);
+ constant_n, crtc_state->fec_enable);
crtc_state->dp_m_n.tu = slots;
return 0;
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add hardware readout for FEC 2019-09-25 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Maarten Lankhorst @ 2019-09-25 8:21 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 9:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Patchwork ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2019-09-25 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx Readout the FEC state in encoder->get_config(), this will allow us to ensure that we can correctly inherit the state from boot, and that we set FEC during modeset. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c index 33cd766f9eea..14fe987888a6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c @@ -4021,6 +4021,23 @@ void intel_ddi_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, pipe_config->lane_count = ((temp & DDI_PORT_WIDTH_MASK) >> DDI_PORT_WIDTH_SHIFT) + 1; intel_dp_get_m_n(intel_crtc, pipe_config); + + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) { + i915_reg_t dp_tp_ctl; + + if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) + dp_tp_ctl = DP_TP_CTL(encoder->port); + else + dp_tp_ctl = TGL_DP_TP_CTL(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder); + + pipe_config->fec_enable = + I915_READ(dp_tp_ctl) & DP_TP_CTL_FEC_ENABLE; + + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] Fec status: %u\n", + encoder->base.base.id, encoder->base.name, + pipe_config->fec_enable); + } + break; case TRANS_DDI_MODE_SELECT_DP_MST: pipe_config->output_types |= BIT(INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c index c4c9286be987..31698a57773f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c @@ -12836,6 +12836,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config, PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(hdmi_scrambling); PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(hdmi_high_tmds_clock_ratio); PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(has_infoframe); + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(fec_enable); PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL_INCOMPLETE(has_audio); -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. 2019-09-25 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add hardware readout for FEC Maarten Lankhorst @ 2019-09-25 9:10 ` Patchwork 2019-09-25 9:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2019-09-25 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67203/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip ae2d2fb87831 drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. -:23: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line) #23: - Handle fec_enable in intel_link_compute_m_n, so only data M/N is adjusted. (Ville) total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 272 lines checked 43fc9a688962 drm/i915: Add hardware readout for FEC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. 2019-09-25 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add hardware readout for FEC Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 9:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Patchwork @ 2019-09-25 9:56 ` Patchwork 2019-09-25 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Ville Syrjälä ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2019-09-25 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67203/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6954 -> Patchwork_14526 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/ Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14526: ### IGT changes ### #### Suppressed #### The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses. They do not affect the overall result. * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices: - {fi-tgl-u2}: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/fi-tgl-u2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14526 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3: - fi-blb-e6850: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([fdo#107718]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/fi-blb-e6850/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic: - fi-hsw-peppy: [DMESG-WARN][5] ([fdo#102614]) -> [PASS][6] [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#102614]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102614 [fdo#107718]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107718 Participating hosts (51 -> 44) ------------------------------ Missing (7): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-y fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus Build changes ------------- * CI: CI-20190529 -> None * Linux: CI_DRM_6954 -> Patchwork_14526 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_6954: 80fa0e042cdb3da59d2c738db61b8da78cf29e0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5202: 3499c5eb17054e2abd88023fe962768140d24302 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_14526: 43fc9a688962d5678e6dfd105530a519b5b7e935 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == 43fc9a688962 drm/i915: Add hardware readout for FEC ae2d2fb87831 drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/index.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. 2019-09-25 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Maarten Lankhorst ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2019-09-25 9:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork @ 2019-09-25 10:26 ` Ville Syrjälä 2019-09-25 10:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 22:43 ` Sasha Levin 2019-09-25 23:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork 5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2019-09-25 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx, stable On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > There was a integer wraparound when mode_clock became too high, > and we didn't correct for the FEC overhead factor when dividing, > with the calculations breaking at HBR3. > > As a result our calculated bpp was way too high, and the link width > limitation never came into effect. > > Print out the resulting bpp calcululations as a sanity check, just > in case we ever have to debug it later on again. > > We also used the wrong factor for FEC. While bspec mentions 2.4%, > all the calculations use 1/0.972261, and the same ratio should be > applied to data M/N as well, so use it there when FEC is enabled. > > This fixes the FIFO underrun we are seeing with FEC enabled. > > Changes since v2: > - Handle fec_enable in intel_link_compute_m_n, so only data M/N is adjusted. (Ville) > - Fix initial hardware readout for FEC. (Ville) > Changes since v3: > - Remove bogus fec_to_mode_clock. (Ville) > Changes since v4: > - Use the correct register for icl. (Ville) > - Split hw readout to a separate patch. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > Fixes: d9218c8f6cf4 ("drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for Compressed BPP and Slice Count for DSC") > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+ > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 184 ++++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 6 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > index 5ecf54270181..c4c9286be987 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > @@ -7291,7 +7291,7 @@ static int ironlake_fdi_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > pipe_config->fdi_lanes = lane; > > intel_link_compute_m_n(pipe_config->pipe_bpp, lane, fdi_dotclock, > - link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false); > + link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false, false); > > ret = ironlake_check_fdi_lanes(dev, intel_crtc->pipe, pipe_config); > if (ret == -EDEADLK) > @@ -7538,11 +7538,15 @@ void > intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bits_per_pixel, int nlanes, > int pixel_clock, int link_clock, > struct intel_link_m_n *m_n, > - bool constant_n) > + bool constant_n, bool fec_enable) > { > - m_n->tu = 64; > + u32 data_clock = bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock; > + > + if (fec_enable) > + data_clock = intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(data_clock); > > - compute_m_n(bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock, > + m_n->tu = 64; > + compute_m_n(data_clock, > link_clock * nlanes * 8, > &m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n, > constant_n); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h > index 5cea6f8e107a..4b9e18e5a263 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h > @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ enum phy_fia { > void intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bpp, int nlanes, > int pixel_clock, int link_clock, > struct intel_link_m_n *m_n, > - bool constant_n); > + bool constant_n, bool fec_enable); > bool is_ccs_modifier(u64 modifier); > void lpt_disable_clkout_dp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > u32 intel_plane_fb_max_stride(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > index 829559f97440..2b1e71f992b0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ > #define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0 340000 > #define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1 400000 > > -/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = (100 - 2.4)/100 */ > -#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 976 > +/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = 1/(0.972261) */ > +#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 972261 > > /* Compliance test status bits */ > #define INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_SHIFT_MASK 0 > @@ -492,6 +492,97 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > return 0; > } > > +u32 intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(u32 mode_clock) > +{ > + return div_u64(mul_u32_u32(mode_clock, 1000000U), > + DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR); > +} > + > +static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count, > + u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay) > +{ > + u32 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram; > + int i; > + > + /* > + * Available Link Bandwidth(Kbits/sec) = (NumberOfLanes)* > + * (LinkSymbolClock)* 8 * (TimeSlotsPerMTP) > + * for SST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP is 1, > + * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated > + */ > + bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8) / > + intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock); Hmm. Aren't we adding the FEC overhead twice now when DSC is also enabled? > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max link bpp: %u\n", bits_per_pixel); > + > + /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */ > + max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER / mode_hdisplay; > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max small joiner bpp: %u\n", max_bpp_small_joiner_ram); > + > + /* > + * Greatest allowed DSC BPP = MIN (output BPP from available Link BW > + * check, output bpp from small joiner RAM check) > + */ > + bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram); > + > + /* Error out if the max bpp is less than smallest allowed valid bpp */ > + if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[0]) { > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported BPP %u, min %u\n", > + bits_per_pixel, valid_dsc_bpp[0]); > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* Find the nearest match in the array of known BPPs from VESA */ > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp) - 1; i++) { > + if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[i + 1]) > + break; > + } > + bits_per_pixel = valid_dsc_bpp[i]; > + > + /* > + * Compressed BPP in U6.4 format so multiply by 16, for Gen 11, > + * fractional part is 0 > + */ > + return bits_per_pixel << 4; > +} > + > +static u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > + int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay) > +{ > + u8 min_slice_count, i; > + int max_slice_width; > + > + if (mode_clock <= DP_DSC_PEAK_PIXEL_RATE) > + min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock, > + DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0); > + else > + min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock, > + DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1); > + > + max_slice_width = drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_width(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd); > + if (max_slice_width < DP_DSC_MIN_SLICE_WIDTH_VALUE) { > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported slice width %d by DP DSC Sink device\n", > + max_slice_width); > + return 0; > + } > + /* Also take into account max slice width */ > + min_slice_count = min_t(u8, min_slice_count, > + DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_hdisplay, > + max_slice_width)); > + > + /* Find the closest match to the valid slice count values */ > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_slicecount); i++) { > + if (valid_dsc_slicecount[i] > > + drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd, > + false)) > + break; > + if (min_slice_count <= valid_dsc_slicecount[i]) > + return valid_dsc_slicecount[i]; > + } > + > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported Slice Count %d\n", min_slice_count); > + return 0; > +} > + > static enum drm_mode_status > intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, > struct drm_display_mode *mode) > @@ -2259,7 +2350,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, > pipe_config->port_clock, > &pipe_config->dp_m_n, > - constant_n); > + constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable); > > if (intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode != NULL && > dev_priv->drrs.type == SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) { > @@ -2269,7 +2360,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode->clock, > pipe_config->port_clock, > &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2, > - constant_n); > + constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable); > } > > if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) > @@ -4373,91 +4464,6 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *sink_irq_vector) > DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN; > } > > -u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(int link_clock, u8 lane_count, > - int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay) > -{ > - u16 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram; > - int i; > - > - /* > - * Available Link Bandwidth(Kbits/sec) = (NumberOfLanes)* > - * (LinkSymbolClock)* 8 * ((100-FECOverhead)/100)*(TimeSlotsPerMTP) > - * FECOverhead = 2.4%, for SST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP is 1, > - * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated > - */ > - bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8 * > - DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR) / > - mode_clock; > - > - /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */ > - max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER / > - mode_hdisplay; > - > - /* > - * Greatest allowed DSC BPP = MIN (output BPP from avaialble Link BW > - * check, output bpp from small joiner RAM check) > - */ > - bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram); > - > - /* Error out if the max bpp is less than smallest allowed valid bpp */ > - if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[0]) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported BPP %d\n", bits_per_pixel); > - return 0; > - } > - > - /* Find the nearest match in the array of known BPPs from VESA */ > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp) - 1; i++) { > - if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[i + 1]) > - break; > - } > - bits_per_pixel = valid_dsc_bpp[i]; > - > - /* > - * Compressed BPP in U6.4 format so multiply by 16, for Gen 11, > - * fractional part is 0 > - */ > - return bits_per_pixel << 4; > -} > - > -u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > - int mode_clock, > - int mode_hdisplay) > -{ > - u8 min_slice_count, i; > - int max_slice_width; > - > - if (mode_clock <= DP_DSC_PEAK_PIXEL_RATE) > - min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock, > - DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0); > - else > - min_slice_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_clock, > - DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1); > - > - max_slice_width = drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_width(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd); > - if (max_slice_width < DP_DSC_MIN_SLICE_WIDTH_VALUE) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported slice width %d by DP DSC Sink device\n", > - max_slice_width); > - return 0; > - } > - /* Also take into account max slice width */ > - min_slice_count = min_t(u8, min_slice_count, > - DIV_ROUND_UP(mode_hdisplay, > - max_slice_width)); > - > - /* Find the closest match to the valid slice count values */ > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_slicecount); i++) { > - if (valid_dsc_slicecount[i] > > - drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd, > - false)) > - break; > - if (min_slice_count <= valid_dsc_slicecount[i]) > - return valid_dsc_slicecount[i]; > - } > - > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported Slice Count %d\n", min_slice_count); > - return 0; > -} > - > static void > intel_pixel_encoding_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h > index e01d1f89409d..a194b5b6da05 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h > @@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ bool intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); > bool intel_dp_source_supports_hbr3(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); > bool > intel_dp_get_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *link_status); > -u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(int link_clock, u8 lane_count, > - int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay); > -u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int mode_clock, > - int mode_hdisplay); > > bool intel_dp_read_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); > bool intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); > @@ -119,4 +115,6 @@ static inline unsigned int intel_dp_unused_lane_mask(int lane_count) > return ~((1 << lane_count) - 1) & 0xf; > } > > +u32 intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(u32 mode_clock); > + > #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c > index eeeb3f933aa4..cf4d851a5139 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, > crtc_state->port_clock, > &crtc_state->dp_m_n, > - constant_n); > + constant_n, crtc_state->fec_enable); > crtc_state->dp_m_n.tu = slots; > > return 0; > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. 2019-09-25 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Ville Syrjälä @ 2019-09-25 10:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 10:40 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2019-09-25 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx, stable Op 25-09-2019 om 12:26 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> There was a integer wraparound when mode_clock became too high, >> and we didn't correct for the FEC overhead factor when dividing, >> with the calculations breaking at HBR3. >> >> As a result our calculated bpp was way too high, and the link width >> limitation never came into effect. >> >> Print out the resulting bpp calcululations as a sanity check, just >> in case we ever have to debug it later on again. >> >> We also used the wrong factor for FEC. While bspec mentions 2.4%, >> all the calculations use 1/0.972261, and the same ratio should be >> applied to data M/N as well, so use it there when FEC is enabled. >> >> This fixes the FIFO underrun we are seeing with FEC enabled. >> >> Changes since v2: >> - Handle fec_enable in intel_link_compute_m_n, so only data M/N is adjusted. (Ville) >> - Fix initial hardware readout for FEC. (Ville) >> Changes since v3: >> - Remove bogus fec_to_mode_clock. (Ville) >> Changes since v4: >> - Use the correct register for icl. (Ville) >> - Split hw readout to a separate patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> >> Fixes: d9218c8f6cf4 ("drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for Compressed BPP and Slice Count for DSC") >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+ >> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 184 ++++++++++--------- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 6 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 2 +- >> 5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c >> index 5ecf54270181..c4c9286be987 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c >> @@ -7291,7 +7291,7 @@ static int ironlake_fdi_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, >> pipe_config->fdi_lanes = lane; >> >> intel_link_compute_m_n(pipe_config->pipe_bpp, lane, fdi_dotclock, >> - link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false); >> + link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false, false); >> >> ret = ironlake_check_fdi_lanes(dev, intel_crtc->pipe, pipe_config); >> if (ret == -EDEADLK) >> @@ -7538,11 +7538,15 @@ void >> intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bits_per_pixel, int nlanes, >> int pixel_clock, int link_clock, >> struct intel_link_m_n *m_n, >> - bool constant_n) >> + bool constant_n, bool fec_enable) >> { >> - m_n->tu = 64; >> + u32 data_clock = bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock; >> + >> + if (fec_enable) >> + data_clock = intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(data_clock); >> >> - compute_m_n(bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock, >> + m_n->tu = 64; >> + compute_m_n(data_clock, >> link_clock * nlanes * 8, >> &m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n, >> constant_n); >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h >> index 5cea6f8e107a..4b9e18e5a263 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h >> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ enum phy_fia { >> void intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bpp, int nlanes, >> int pixel_clock, int link_clock, >> struct intel_link_m_n *m_n, >> - bool constant_n); >> + bool constant_n, bool fec_enable); >> bool is_ccs_modifier(u64 modifier); >> void lpt_disable_clkout_dp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); >> u32 intel_plane_fb_max_stride(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> index 829559f97440..2b1e71f992b0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ >> #define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0 340000 >> #define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1 400000 >> >> -/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = (100 - 2.4)/100 */ >> -#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 976 >> +/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = 1/(0.972261) */ >> +#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 972261 >> >> /* Compliance test status bits */ >> #define INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_SHIFT_MASK 0 >> @@ -492,6 +492,97 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +u32 intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(u32 mode_clock) >> +{ >> + return div_u64(mul_u32_u32(mode_clock, 1000000U), >> + DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR); >> +} >> + >> +static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count, >> + u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay) >> +{ >> + u32 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram; >> + int i; >> + >> + /* >> + * Available Link Bandwidth(Kbits/sec) = (NumberOfLanes)* >> + * (LinkSymbolClock)* 8 * (TimeSlotsPerMTP) >> + * for SST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP is 1, >> + * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated >> + */ >> + bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8) / >> + intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock); > Hmm. Aren't we adding the FEC overhead twice now when DSC is also > enabled? No? This is calculating the maximum bpp that can be used for DSC. "For cases where FEC is enabled, pixel clock is replaced by pixel clock/0.972261 in the above calculations." This bpp check here is to ensure that data M <= N. ~Maarten ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. 2019-09-25 10:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst @ 2019-09-25 10:40 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2019-09-25 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx, stable On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:34:17PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 25-09-2019 om 12:26 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:21:09AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> There was a integer wraparound when mode_clock became too high, > >> and we didn't correct for the FEC overhead factor when dividing, > >> with the calculations breaking at HBR3. > >> > >> As a result our calculated bpp was way too high, and the link width > >> limitation never came into effect. > >> > >> Print out the resulting bpp calcululations as a sanity check, just > >> in case we ever have to debug it later on again. > >> > >> We also used the wrong factor for FEC. While bspec mentions 2.4%, > >> all the calculations use 1/0.972261, and the same ratio should be > >> applied to data M/N as well, so use it there when FEC is enabled. > >> > >> This fixes the FIFO underrun we are seeing with FEC enabled. > >> > >> Changes since v2: > >> - Handle fec_enable in intel_link_compute_m_n, so only data M/N is adjusted. (Ville) > >> - Fix initial hardware readout for FEC. (Ville) > >> Changes since v3: > >> - Remove bogus fec_to_mode_clock. (Ville) > >> Changes since v4: > >> - Use the correct register for icl. (Ville) > >> - Split hw readout to a separate patch. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > >> Fixes: d9218c8f6cf4 ("drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for Compressed BPP and Slice Count for DSC") > >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+ > >> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 2 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 184 ++++++++++--------- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 6 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 2 +- > >> 5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >> index 5ecf54270181..c4c9286be987 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > >> @@ -7291,7 +7291,7 @@ static int ironlake_fdi_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > >> pipe_config->fdi_lanes = lane; > >> > >> intel_link_compute_m_n(pipe_config->pipe_bpp, lane, fdi_dotclock, > >> - link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false); > >> + link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false, false); > >> > >> ret = ironlake_check_fdi_lanes(dev, intel_crtc->pipe, pipe_config); > >> if (ret == -EDEADLK) > >> @@ -7538,11 +7538,15 @@ void > >> intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bits_per_pixel, int nlanes, > >> int pixel_clock, int link_clock, > >> struct intel_link_m_n *m_n, > >> - bool constant_n) > >> + bool constant_n, bool fec_enable) > >> { > >> - m_n->tu = 64; > >> + u32 data_clock = bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock; > >> + > >> + if (fec_enable) > >> + data_clock = intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(data_clock); > >> > >> - compute_m_n(bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock, > >> + m_n->tu = 64; > >> + compute_m_n(data_clock, > >> link_clock * nlanes * 8, > >> &m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n, > >> constant_n); > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h > >> index 5cea6f8e107a..4b9e18e5a263 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h > >> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ enum phy_fia { > >> void intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bpp, int nlanes, > >> int pixel_clock, int link_clock, > >> struct intel_link_m_n *m_n, > >> - bool constant_n); > >> + bool constant_n, bool fec_enable); > >> bool is_ccs_modifier(u64 modifier); > >> void lpt_disable_clkout_dp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > >> u32 intel_plane_fb_max_stride(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > >> index 829559f97440..2b1e71f992b0 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > >> @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ > >> #define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_0 340000 > >> #define DP_DSC_MAX_ENC_THROUGHPUT_1 400000 > >> > >> -/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = (100 - 2.4)/100 */ > >> -#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 976 > >> +/* DP DSC FEC Overhead factor = 1/(0.972261) */ > >> +#define DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR 972261 > >> > >> /* Compliance test status bits */ > >> #define INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_SHIFT_MASK 0 > >> @@ -492,6 +492,97 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> +u32 intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(u32 mode_clock) > >> +{ > >> + return div_u64(mul_u32_u32(mode_clock, 1000000U), > >> + DP_DSC_FEC_OVERHEAD_FACTOR); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count, > >> + u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay) > >> +{ > >> + u32 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram; > >> + int i; > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * Available Link Bandwidth(Kbits/sec) = (NumberOfLanes)* > >> + * (LinkSymbolClock)* 8 * (TimeSlotsPerMTP) > >> + * for SST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP is 1, > >> + * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated > >> + */ > >> + bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8) / > >> + intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock); > > Hmm. Aren't we adding the FEC overhead twice now when DSC is also > > enabled? > > No? This is calculating the maximum bpp that can be used for DSC. Ah, right. Seems fine then. Series is Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > "For cases where FEC is enabled, pixel clock is replaced by pixel clock/0.972261 in the above calculations." > > This bpp check here is to ensure that data M <= N. > > ~Maarten -- Ville Syrjälä Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. 2019-09-25 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Maarten Lankhorst ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2019-09-25 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Ville Syrjälä @ 2019-09-25 22:43 ` Sasha Levin 2019-09-25 23:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork 5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-09-25 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sasha Levin, Maarten Lankhorst, intel-gfx; +Cc: stable Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: d9218c8f6cf4 drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for Compressed BPP and Slice Count for DSC. The bot has tested the following trees: v5.3.1, v5.2.17. v5.3.1: Build OK! v5.2.17: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3c053a96ef5f ("drm/i915/dp: Program VSC Header and DB for Pixel Encoding/Colorimetry Format") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. 2019-09-25 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Maarten Lankhorst ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2019-09-25 22:43 ` Sasha Levin @ 2019-09-25 23:14 ` Patchwork 5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2019-09-25 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67203/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6954_full -> Patchwork_14526_full ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14526_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1: - shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109276]) +14 similar issues [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html * igt@gem_ctx_switch@bcs0-heavy-queue: - shard-apl: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([fdo#103927]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-apl8/igt@gem_ctx_switch@bcs0-heavy-queue.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-apl7/igt@gem_ctx_switch@bcs0-heavy-queue.html * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend: - shard-apl: [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([fdo#108566]) +1 similar issue [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-apl2/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-apl5/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd: - shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#111325]) +3 similar issues [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd.html * igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded: - shard-apl: [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] ([fdo#108686]) [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-apl7/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-apl2/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html * igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader: - shard-kbl: [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-WARN][12] ([fdo#108566]) [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-kbl4/igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-kbl3/igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader.html * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-xtiled: - shard-skl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([fdo#103184] / [fdo#103232]) [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl10/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-xtiled.html [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl4/igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-rgb565-render-xtiled.html * igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible: - shard-glk: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([fdo#100368]) [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-glk7/igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-glk5/igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend: - shard-skl: [PASS][17] -> [INCOMPLETE][18] ([fdo#109507]) [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-render: - shard-iclb: [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([fdo#103167]) +4 similar issues [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-render.html [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-render.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3: - shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][21] ([fdo#108566]) -> [PASS][22] +6 similar issues [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html * igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][23] ([fdo#110841]) -> [PASS][24] [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html * igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts: - shard-skl: [DMESG-WARN][25] ([fdo#106107]) -> [PASS][26] [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl10/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl4/igt@gem_exec_parallel@contexts.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][27] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][28] +11 similar issues [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1.html [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-bsd: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][29] ([fdo#111325]) -> [PASS][30] +3 similar issues [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-bsd.html [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-bsd.html * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-c-256x256-top-edge: - shard-apl: [TIMEOUT][31] ([fdo#111800]) -> [PASS][32] [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-apl7/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-c-256x256-top-edge.html [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-apl2/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-c-256x256-top-edge.html * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible: - shard-glk: [FAIL][33] ([fdo#105363]) -> [PASS][34] [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-glk1/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-glk2/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible: - shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][35] ([fdo#109507]) -> [PASS][36] [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl10/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-badstride: - shard-iclb: [FAIL][37] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][38] +2 similar issues [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-badstride.html [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-badstride.html * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a: - shard-iclb: [DMESG-WARN][39] ([fdo#111764]) -> [PASS][40] [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min: - shard-skl: [FAIL][41] ([fdo#108145]) -> [PASS][42] [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl6/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc: - shard-skl: [FAIL][43] ([fdo#108145] / [fdo#110403]) -> [PASS][44] [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl10/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl4/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][45] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][46] +1 similar issue [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-ts-continuation-dpms-suspend: - shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][47] ([fdo#104108]) -> [PASS][48] [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl9/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-ts-continuation-dpms-suspend.html [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl2/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-ts-continuation-dpms-suspend.html * igt@perf@gen8-unprivileged-single-ctx-counters: - shard-skl: [DMESG-FAIL][49] -> [PASS][50] [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-skl10/igt@perf@gen8-unprivileged-single-ctx-counters.html [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-skl4/igt@perf@gen8-unprivileged-single-ctx-counters.html * igt@perf_pmu@cpu-hotplug: - shard-apl: [TIMEOUT][51] ([fdo#111546] / [fdo#111800]) -> [PASS][52] [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-apl7/igt@perf_pmu@cpu-hotplug.html [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-apl2/igt@perf_pmu@cpu-hotplug.html #### Warnings #### * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-isolation-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [FAIL][53] ([fdo#111330]) -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#109276]) [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6954/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-isolation-bsd2.html [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-isolation-bsd2.html [fdo#100368]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368 [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167 [fdo#103184]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103184 [fdo#103232]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103232 [fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927 [fdo#104108]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104108 [fdo#105363]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105363 [fdo#106107]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106107 [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145 [fdo#108566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 [fdo#108686]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108686 [fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276 [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441 [fdo#109507]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109507 [fdo#110403]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110403 [fdo#110841]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110841 [fdo#111325]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111325 [fdo#111330]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111330 [fdo#111546]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111546 [fdo#111764]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111764 [fdo#111800]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111800 Participating hosts (9 -> 9) ------------------------------ No changes in participating hosts Build changes ------------- * CI: CI-20190529 -> None * Linux: CI_DRM_6954 -> Patchwork_14526 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_6954: 80fa0e042cdb3da59d2c738db61b8da78cf29e0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5202: 3499c5eb17054e2abd88023fe962768140d24302 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_14526: 43fc9a688962d5678e6dfd105530a519b5b7e935 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14526/ _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-25 23:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-09-25 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add hardware readout for FEC Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 9:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix dsc bpp calculations, v5 Patchwork 2019-09-25 9:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2019-09-25 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Ville Syrjälä 2019-09-25 10:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst 2019-09-25 10:40 ` Ville Syrjälä 2019-09-25 22:43 ` Sasha Levin 2019-09-25 23:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox