public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Handle a few more cases for crtc hw/uapi split, v2.
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:33:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018103312.GX1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191017132105.15528-3-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:20:54PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> We are still looking at drm_crtc_state in a few places, convert those
> to use intel_crtc_state instead.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Move to before uapi/hw split.
> - Add hunks for intel_pm.c as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c     |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c              |  6 ++----
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 945ab2180614..5632e13d458d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -16092,8 +16092,8 @@ static int intel_initial_commit(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct drm_atomic_state *state = NULL;
>  	struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> -	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> -	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;

crtc_state declaration can be moved into the loop.

>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(dev);
> @@ -16105,15 +16105,15 @@ static int intel_initial_commit(struct drm_device *dev)
>  retry:
>  	state->acquire_ctx = &ctx;
>  
> -	drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, dev) {
> -		crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
> +		crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>  		if (IS_ERR(crtc_state)) {
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(crtc_state);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (crtc_state->active) {
> -			ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
> +		if (crtc_state->base.active) {
> +			ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, &crtc->base);
>  			if (ret)
>  				goto out;
>  
> @@ -16123,7 +16123,7 @@ static int intel_initial_commit(struct drm_device *dev)
>  			 * having a proper LUT loaded. Remove once we
>  			 * have readout for pipe gamma enable.
>  			 */
> -			crtc_state->color_mgmt_changed = true;
> +			crtc_state->base.color_mgmt_changed = true;

I guess this part would be fine with using the drm stuff since it's a
high level thing, so kinda sits at the uapi level. But probably best
to convert to explicit .uapi anyway.

>  		}
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 2203be28ea01..5484bd4534c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  
>  		if (!crtc_state ||
>  		    !drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state) ||
> -		    crtc_state->enable)
> +		    to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state)->base.enable)

I'd prefer to get rid the the struct drm_crtc_state type variable
totally because if it remains I'm sure someone will use it.

>  			return 0;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 50f22abcd30e..211710f5214c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1139,9 +1139,9 @@ static int intel_psr_fastset_force(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  		intel_crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state);
>  
> -		if (crtc_state->active && intel_crtc_state->has_psr) {
> +		if (intel_crtc_state->base.active && intel_crtc_state->has_psr) {
>  			/* Mark mode as changed to trigger a pipe->update() */
> -			crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
> +			intel_crtc_state->base.mode_changed = true;

Ugh, more aliasing variables. Can we just kill the drm_ one?

Otherwise looks good to me, so
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index ef36e7834ed4..e680df75a970 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3082,11 +3082,9 @@ static bool ilk_validate_pipe_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  /* Compute new watermarks for the pipe */
>  static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> -	struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->base.state;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->base.crtc->dev);
>  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>  	struct intel_pipe_wm *pipe_wm;
> -	struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
> -	const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>  	struct intel_plane *plane;
>  	const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
>  	const struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL;
> @@ -3781,7 +3779,7 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  	crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
>  	crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
>  
> -	if (crtc->base.state->adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
> +	if (crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-18 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-17 13:20 [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Rework watermark readout to use plane api Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:20 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Introduce intel_atomic_get_plane_state_after_check(), v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:20 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Handle a few more cases for crtc hw/uapi split, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-18 10:33   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-10-17 13:20 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Add aliases for uapi and hw to crtc_state Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-18 10:36   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-18 12:09     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-18 13:09       ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-17 13:20 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Perform manual conversions for crtc uapi/hw split Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-18  8:11   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-18  8:13   ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Perform manual conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-22 18:16     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-24 12:12       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-24 12:12         ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-24 12:23         ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-24 12:23           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-24 12:35           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-24 12:35             ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:20 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, base -> hw Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-18 12:59   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-17 13:20 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, base -> uapi Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-22 18:24   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-17 13:20 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Complete crtc hw/uapi split, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-22 18:32   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-23 15:06     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-23 15:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:21 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Add aliases for uapi and hw to plane_state Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:21 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Perform manual conversions for plane uapi/hw split Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:21 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for plane uapi/hw split, base -> hw Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:21 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for plane uapi/hw split, base -> uapi Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:21 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Complete plane hw and uapi split, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:21 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Remove special case slave handling during hw programming, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-18 14:52   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-22 10:31   ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove special case slave handling during hw programming, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-22 18:14     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-23 10:31       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-23 10:31         ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Rework watermark readout to use plane api Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-17 14:11   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-17 18:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/14] " Patchwork
2019-10-17 18:50 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-18  8:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/14] drm/i915: Rework watermark readout to use plane api (rev2) Patchwork
2019-10-18  8:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-18 10:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-18 14:03   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-22 18:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [01/14] drm/i915: Rework watermark readout to use plane api (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191018103312.GX1208@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox