From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915/selftests: check for missing aperture
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:28:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191029102851.7497-7-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191029102851.7497-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
We may be missing support for the mappable aperture on some platforms.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
.../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c | 14 ++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 3 +++
5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
index 0a195e5b98e6..2b29f6b4e1dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
@@ -250,7 +250,12 @@ static bool always_valid(struct context *ctx)
static bool needs_fence_registers(struct context *ctx)
{
- return !intel_gt_is_wedged(ctx->engine->gt);
+ struct intel_gt *gt = ctx->engine->gt;
+
+ if (intel_gt_is_wedged(gt))
+ return false;
+
+ return gt->ggtt->num_fences;
}
static bool needs_mi_store_dword(struct context *ctx)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
index d45a93928ff5..29b2077b73d2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ static int igt_partial_tiling(void *arg)
int tiling;
int err;
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(&i915->ggtt))
+ return 0;
+
/* We want to check the page mapping and fencing of a large object
* mmapped through the GTT. The object we create is larger than can
* possibly be mmaped as a whole, and so we must use partial GGTT vma.
@@ -431,6 +434,9 @@ static int igt_smoke_tiling(void *arg)
IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
int err;
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(&i915->ggtt))
+ return 0;
+
/*
* igt_partial_tiling() does an exhastive check of partial tiling
* chunking, but will undoubtably run out of time. Here, we do a
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
index b7207b488391..8abc0a1d692b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
@@ -1149,8 +1149,12 @@ static int __igt_reset_evict_vma(struct intel_gt *gt,
struct i915_request *rq;
struct evict_vma arg;
struct hang h;
+ unsigned int pin_flags;
int err;
+ if (!gt->ggtt->num_fences && flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE)
+ return 0;
+
if (!engine || !intel_engine_can_store_dword(engine))
return 0;
@@ -1186,10 +1190,12 @@ static int __igt_reset_evict_vma(struct intel_gt *gt,
goto out_obj;
}
- err = i915_vma_pin(arg.vma, 0, 0,
- i915_vma_is_ggtt(arg.vma) ?
- PIN_GLOBAL | PIN_MAPPABLE :
- PIN_USER);
+ pin_flags = i915_vma_is_ggtt(arg.vma) ? PIN_GLOBAL : PIN_USER;
+
+ if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE)
+ pin_flags |= PIN_MAPPABLE;
+
+ err = i915_vma_pin(arg.vma, 0, 0, pin_flags);
if (err) {
i915_request_add(rq);
goto out_obj;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
index 6d22567ad620..e378543ed453 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ static void trash_stolen(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
unsigned long page;
u32 prng = 0x12345678;
+ /* XXX: fsck. needs some more thought... */
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(ggtt))
+ return;
+
for (page = 0; page < size; page += PAGE_SIZE) {
const dma_addr_t dma = i915->dsm.start + page;
u32 __iomem *s;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
index a1cb072e4a1b..3f7e80fb3bbd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -1149,6 +1149,9 @@ static int igt_ggtt_page(void *arg)
unsigned int *order, n;
int err;
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(ggtt))
+ return 0;
+
obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(i915, PAGE_SIZE);
if (IS_ERR(obj))
return PTR_ERR(obj);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915/selftests: check for missing aperture
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:28:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191029102851.7497-7-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191029102851.THr6hBmnu73VLQZgASFpsWH4MA263Z3KHY6nwkNB-bE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191029102851.7497-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
We may be missing support for the mappable aperture on some platforms.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
.../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c | 14 ++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 3 +++
5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
index 0a195e5b98e6..2b29f6b4e1dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_coherency.c
@@ -250,7 +250,12 @@ static bool always_valid(struct context *ctx)
static bool needs_fence_registers(struct context *ctx)
{
- return !intel_gt_is_wedged(ctx->engine->gt);
+ struct intel_gt *gt = ctx->engine->gt;
+
+ if (intel_gt_is_wedged(gt))
+ return false;
+
+ return gt->ggtt->num_fences;
}
static bool needs_mi_store_dword(struct context *ctx)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
index d45a93928ff5..29b2077b73d2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ static int igt_partial_tiling(void *arg)
int tiling;
int err;
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(&i915->ggtt))
+ return 0;
+
/* We want to check the page mapping and fencing of a large object
* mmapped through the GTT. The object we create is larger than can
* possibly be mmaped as a whole, and so we must use partial GGTT vma.
@@ -431,6 +434,9 @@ static int igt_smoke_tiling(void *arg)
IGT_TIMEOUT(end);
int err;
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(&i915->ggtt))
+ return 0;
+
/*
* igt_partial_tiling() does an exhastive check of partial tiling
* chunking, but will undoubtably run out of time. Here, we do a
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
index b7207b488391..8abc0a1d692b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
@@ -1149,8 +1149,12 @@ static int __igt_reset_evict_vma(struct intel_gt *gt,
struct i915_request *rq;
struct evict_vma arg;
struct hang h;
+ unsigned int pin_flags;
int err;
+ if (!gt->ggtt->num_fences && flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE)
+ return 0;
+
if (!engine || !intel_engine_can_store_dword(engine))
return 0;
@@ -1186,10 +1190,12 @@ static int __igt_reset_evict_vma(struct intel_gt *gt,
goto out_obj;
}
- err = i915_vma_pin(arg.vma, 0, 0,
- i915_vma_is_ggtt(arg.vma) ?
- PIN_GLOBAL | PIN_MAPPABLE :
- PIN_USER);
+ pin_flags = i915_vma_is_ggtt(arg.vma) ? PIN_GLOBAL : PIN_USER;
+
+ if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE)
+ pin_flags |= PIN_MAPPABLE;
+
+ err = i915_vma_pin(arg.vma, 0, 0, pin_flags);
if (err) {
i915_request_add(rq);
goto out_obj;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
index 6d22567ad620..e378543ed453 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c
@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ static void trash_stolen(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
unsigned long page;
u32 prng = 0x12345678;
+ /* XXX: fsck. needs some more thought... */
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(ggtt))
+ return;
+
for (page = 0; page < size; page += PAGE_SIZE) {
const dma_addr_t dma = i915->dsm.start + page;
u32 __iomem *s;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
index a1cb072e4a1b..3f7e80fb3bbd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -1149,6 +1149,9 @@ static int igt_ggtt_page(void *arg)
unsigned int *order, n;
int err;
+ if (!i915_ggtt_has_aperture(ggtt))
+ return 0;
+
obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(i915, PAGE_SIZE);
if (IS_ERR(obj))
return PTR_ERR(obj);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-29 10:28 [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915: define i915_ggtt_has_aperture Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: do not map aperture if it is not available Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: set num_fence_regs to 0 if there is no aperture Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: error capture with no ggtt slot Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915: Don't try to place HWS in non-existing mappable region Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915: don't allocate the ring in stolen if we lack aperture Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 10:28 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2019-10-29 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915/selftests: check for missing aperture Matthew Auld
2019-10-29 12:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [v2,1/7] drm/i915: define i915_ggtt_has_aperture Patchwork
2019-10-29 12:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191029102851.7497-7-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).