From: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/psr: Refactor psr short pulse handler
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:45:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106014504.167656-2-jose.souza@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106014504.167656-1-jose.souza@intel.com>
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it
to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and
set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it
was implemented.
But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is
a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was
state above as more checks will be added to this function.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 51 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index 0d84ea28bc6f..f38da1b9b323 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -1386,11 +1386,30 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
mutex_init(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
}
+static bool psr_get_status_and_error_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+ u8 *status, u8 *error_status)
+{
+ struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &intel_dp->aux;
+ int r;
+
+ r = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, status);
+ if (r != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ r = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, error_status);
+ if (r != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ *status = *status & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
struct i915_psr *psr = &dev_priv->psr;
- u8 val;
+ u8 status, error_status;
const u8 errors = DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR;
@@ -1403,38 +1422,30 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
if (!psr->enabled || psr->dp != intel_dp)
goto exit;
- if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) != 1) {
- DRM_ERROR("PSR_STATUS dpcd read failed\n");
+ if (!psr_get_status_and_error_status(intel_dp, &status, &error_status)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Error reading PSR status or error status\n");
goto exit;
}
- if ((val & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK) == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR sink internal error, disabling PSR\n");
+ if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR || (error_status & errors)) {
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
}
- if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, &val) != 1) {
- DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS dpcd read failed\n");
- goto exit;
- }
-
- if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
+ if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR && !error_status)
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR sink internal error, disabling PSR\n");
+ if (error_status & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, disabling PSR\n");
- if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
+ if (error_status & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR VSC SDP uncorrectable error, disabling PSR\n");
- if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
+ if (error_status & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, disabling PSR\n");
- if (val & ~errors)
+ if (error_status & ~errors)
DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS unhandled errors %x\n",
- val & ~errors);
- if (val & errors) {
- intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
- psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
- }
+ error_status & ~errors);
/* clear status register */
- drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, val);
+ drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, error_status);
exit:
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
}
--
2.24.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/psr: Refactor psr short pulse handler
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:45:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106014504.167656-2-jose.souza@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191106014501.AoczcJ3PuXWcBtB6d3zdTlqRKx1SvE-vdVrsAvzQjoo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106014504.167656-1-jose.souza@intel.com>
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it
to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and
set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it
was implemented.
But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is
a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was
state above as more checks will be added to this function.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 51 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index 0d84ea28bc6f..f38da1b9b323 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -1386,11 +1386,30 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
mutex_init(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
}
+static bool psr_get_status_and_error_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+ u8 *status, u8 *error_status)
+{
+ struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &intel_dp->aux;
+ int r;
+
+ r = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, status);
+ if (r != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ r = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, error_status);
+ if (r != 1)
+ return false;
+
+ *status = *status & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
struct i915_psr *psr = &dev_priv->psr;
- u8 val;
+ u8 status, error_status;
const u8 errors = DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR;
@@ -1403,38 +1422,30 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
if (!psr->enabled || psr->dp != intel_dp)
goto exit;
- if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) != 1) {
- DRM_ERROR("PSR_STATUS dpcd read failed\n");
+ if (!psr_get_status_and_error_status(intel_dp, &status, &error_status)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Error reading PSR status or error status\n");
goto exit;
}
- if ((val & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK) == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR sink internal error, disabling PSR\n");
+ if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR || (error_status & errors)) {
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
}
- if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, &val) != 1) {
- DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS dpcd read failed\n");
- goto exit;
- }
-
- if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
+ if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR && !error_status)
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR sink internal error, disabling PSR\n");
+ if (error_status & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, disabling PSR\n");
- if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
+ if (error_status & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR VSC SDP uncorrectable error, disabling PSR\n");
- if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
+ if (error_status & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, disabling PSR\n");
- if (val & ~errors)
+ if (error_status & ~errors)
DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS unhandled errors %x\n",
- val & ~errors);
- if (val & errors) {
- intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
- psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
- }
+ error_status & ~errors);
/* clear status register */
- drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, val);
+ drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, error_status);
exit:
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
}
--
2.24.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-06 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-06 1:45 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-06 1:45 ` José Roberto de Souza [this message]
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/psr: Refactor psr short pulse handler José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-12 17:31 ` Matt Roper
2019-11-12 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/psr: Enable ALPM lock timeout error interruption José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/psr: Check if sink PSR capability changed José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/vbt: Parse power conservation features block José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-06 1:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " José Roberto de Souza
2019-11-12 21:21 ` Matt Roper
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-12 23:56 ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-12 23:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2019-11-26 0:47 ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-26 0:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2019-11-27 18:02 ` Matt Roper
2019-11-27 18:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-27 22:48 ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-27 22:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2019-11-06 2:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation Patchwork
2019-11-06 2:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-06 23:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-11-06 23:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-12 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Matt Roper
2019-11-12 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2019-11-12 18:30 ` Souza, Jose
2019-11-12 18:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2019-11-13 19:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-13 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-13 19:12 ` Lucas De Marchi
2019-11-13 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191106014504.167656-2-jose.souza@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox