Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 02/10] drm/i915: Eliminate magic numbers "0" and "1" from color plane
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:17:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402161752.GY13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326181005.11775-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:09:57PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> According to many computer science sources - magic values
> in code _are_ _bad_. For many reasons: the reason is that "0"
> or "1" or whatever magic values confuses and doesn't give any
> info why this parameter is this value and what it's meaning
> is.
> I renamed "0" to COLOR_PLANE_Y and "1" to COLOR_PLANE_UV,
> because we in fact already use this naming in many other places
> and function names, when dealing with color planes.

And now it's incosistent with all the rest of the codebase :(

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  5 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               | 40 +++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index 176ab5f1e867..523e0444b373 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -682,6 +682,11 @@ struct skl_plane_wm {
>  	bool is_planar;
>  };
>  
> +enum color_plane {
> +	COLOR_PLANE_Y,
> +	COLOR_PLANE_UV
> +};
> +
>  struct skl_pipe_wm {
>  	struct skl_plane_wm planes[I915_MAX_PLANES];
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index b632b6bb9c3e..9e9a4612d842 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4013,7 +4013,7 @@ static int skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 int width, const struct drm_format_info *format,
>  				 u64 modifier, unsigned int rotation,
>  				 u32 plane_pixel_rate, struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> -				 int color_plane);
> +				 enum color_plane);
>  static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 int level,
>  				 unsigned int latency,
> @@ -4035,7 +4035,7 @@ skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				    drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888),
>  				    DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR,
>  				    DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0,
> -				    crtc_state->pixel_rate, &wp, 0);
> +				    crtc_state->pixel_rate, &wp, COLOR_PLANE_Y);
>  	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, ret);
>  
>  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> @@ -4431,7 +4431,7 @@ static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  static u64
>  skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			     const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> -			     int color_plane)
> +			     enum color_plane color_plane)
>  {
>  	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->uapi.plane);
>  	const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> @@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	if (plane->id == PLANE_CURSOR)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (color_plane == 1 &&
> +	if (color_plane == COLOR_PLANE_UV &&
>  	    !intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar(fb->format, fb->modifier))
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -4459,7 +4459,7 @@ skl_plane_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	height = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->uapi.src) >> 16;
>  
>  	/* UV plane does 1/2 pixel sub-sampling */
> -	if (color_plane == 1) {
> +	if (color_plane == COLOR_PLANE_UV) {
>  		width /= 2;
>  		height /= 2;
>  	}
> @@ -4489,12 +4489,12 @@ skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  		u64 rate;
>  
>  		/* packed/y */
> -		rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, 0);
> +		rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, COLOR_PLANE_Y);
>  		plane_data_rate[plane_id] = rate;
>  		total_data_rate += rate;
>  
>  		/* uv-plane */
> -		rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, 1);
> +		rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, COLOR_PLANE_UV);
>  		uv_plane_data_rate[plane_id] = rate;
>  		total_data_rate += rate;
>  	}
> @@ -4516,7 +4516,7 @@ icl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  		u64 rate;
>  
>  		if (!plane_state->planar_linked_plane) {
> -			rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, 0);
> +			rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, COLOR_PLANE_Y);
>  			plane_data_rate[plane_id] = rate;
>  			total_data_rate += rate;
>  		} else {
> @@ -4533,12 +4533,12 @@ icl_get_total_relative_data_rate(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				continue;
>  
>  			/* Y plane rate is calculated on the slave */
> -			rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, 0);
> +			rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, COLOR_PLANE_Y);
>  			y_plane_id = plane_state->planar_linked_plane->id;
>  			plane_data_rate[y_plane_id] = rate;
>  			total_data_rate += rate;
>  
> -			rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, 1);
> +			rate = skl_plane_relative_data_rate(crtc_state, plane_state, COLOR_PLANE_UV);
>  			plane_data_rate[plane_id] = rate;
>  			total_data_rate += rate;
>  		}
> @@ -4854,14 +4854,14 @@ skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  		      int width, const struct drm_format_info *format,
>  		      u64 modifier, unsigned int rotation,
>  		      u32 plane_pixel_rate, struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> -		      int color_plane)
> +		      enum color_plane color_plane)
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>  	u32 interm_pbpl;
>  
>  	/* only planar format has two planes */
> -	if (color_plane == 1 &&
> +	if (color_plane == COLOR_PLANE_UV &&
>  	    !intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar(format, modifier)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>  			    "Non planar format have single plane\n");
> @@ -4878,7 +4878,7 @@ skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	wp->is_planar = intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar(format, modifier);
>  
>  	wp->width = width;
> -	if (color_plane == 1 && wp->is_planar)
> +	if (color_plane == COLOR_PLANE_UV && wp->is_planar)
>  		wp->width /= 2;
>  
>  	wp->cpp = format->cpp[color_plane];
> @@ -4945,7 +4945,7 @@ skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  static int
>  skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			    const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> -			    struct skl_wm_params *wp, int color_plane)
> +			    struct skl_wm_params *wp, enum color_plane color_plane)
>  {
>  	const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
>  	int width;
> @@ -5187,7 +5187,7 @@ static void skl_compute_transition_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  
>  static int skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				     const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> -				     enum plane_id plane_id, int color_plane)
> +				     enum plane_id plane_id, enum color_plane color_plane)
>  {
>  	struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];
>  	struct skl_wm_params wm_params;
> @@ -5216,7 +5216,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_uv(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  
>  	/* uv plane watermarks must also be validated for NV12/Planar */
>  	ret = skl_compute_plane_wm_params(crtc_state, plane_state,
> -					  &wm_params, 1);
> +					  &wm_params, COLOR_PLANE_UV);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -5237,7 +5237,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	ret = skl_build_plane_wm_single(crtc_state, plane_state,
> -					plane_id, 0);
> +					plane_id, COLOR_PLANE_Y);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -5270,17 +5270,17 @@ static int icl_build_plane_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			fb->format->num_planes == 1);
>  
>  		ret = skl_build_plane_wm_single(crtc_state, plane_state,
> -						y_plane_id, 0);
> +						y_plane_id, COLOR_PLANE_Y);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
>  		ret = skl_build_plane_wm_single(crtc_state, plane_state,
> -						plane_id, 1);
> +						plane_id, COLOR_PLANE_UV);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	} else if (intel_wm_plane_visible(crtc_state, plane_state)) {
>  		ret = skl_build_plane_wm_single(crtc_state, plane_state,
> -						plane_id, 0);
> +						plane_id, COLOR_PLANE_Y);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-02 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-26 18:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 00/10] SAGV support for Gen12+ Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 01/10] drm/i915: Start passing latency as parameter Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 02/10] drm/i915: Eliminate magic numbers "0" and "1" from color plane Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 16:17   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-04-02 16:28     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-02 16:41       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03 15:41   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 03/10] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 04/10] drm/i915: Add intel_atomic_get_bw_*_state helpers Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 16:20   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-02 16:49     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:11   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-03  6:15   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 05/10] drm/i915: Extract gen specific functions from intel_can_enable_sagv Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 16:44   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-07 19:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-08  7:58       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-08 14:55         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-08 15:54           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-08 16:18             ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-09 15:58               ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 06/10] drm/i915: Add proper SAGV support for TGL+ Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:39   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:22     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:29     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-03 15:43       ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 07/10] drm/i915: Added required new PCode commands Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:27   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:32   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 08/10] drm/i915: Rename bw_state to new_bw_state Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:30   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:34   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 09/10] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:36   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:50     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:37     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-03 16:41       ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 10/10] drm/i915: Enable SAGV support for Gen12 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 20:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev3) Patchwork
2020-03-26 21:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-27 11:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev4) Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev5) Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev10) Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-04-03  7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-04-03 16:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev12) Patchwork
2020-04-03 16:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev10) Patchwork
2020-04-03 17:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev13) Patchwork
2020-04-03 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-04-04  2:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200402161752.GY13686@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox