From: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
To: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] i915/perf: 32bit printf cleanup
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:54:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200821075449.GE7444@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdb17eb-4f92-ac67-5d89-de7b797663f8@intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:45:23AM +0300, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 20/08/2020 20:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Use PRI[du]64 as necessary for 32bit builds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>
Was this for just 1/4 or the whole series?
This one is for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Lionel
>
> > ---
> > tests/i915/perf.c | 8 ++++----
> > tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/perf.c b/tests/i915/perf.c
> > index 92edc9f1f..a894fd382 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/perf.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/perf.c
> > @@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ test_blocking(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ke
> > user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
> > kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
> > - igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> > + igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> > n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
> > igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. context switches)\n",
> > n_extra_iterations);
> > @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ test_polling(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ker
> > user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
> > kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
> > - igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> > + igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> > n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
> > igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. context switches)\n",
> > n_extra_iterations);
> > @@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
> > int64_t start, end;
> > int num_reports = 0;
> > - igt_debug("Expected duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
> > + igt_debug("Expected duration = %"PRId64"\n", *duration_ns);
> > stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, param, true);
> > @@ -2389,7 +2389,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
> > *duration_ns = end - start;
> > - igt_debug("Actual duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
> > + igt_debug("Actual duration = %"PRIu64"\n", *duration_ns);
> > return num_reports;
> > }
> > diff --git a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> > index 7671f39b4..adc41c29f 100644
> > --- a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> > +++ b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> > @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > }
> > ctx.oa_exponent = oa_exponent_for_period(ctx.timestamp_frequency, perf_period);
> > - fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%lu oa_exponent=%u\n",
> > + fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%"PRIu64" oa_exponent=%u\n",
> > ctx.metric_set->perf_oa_metrics_set, ctx.oa_exponent);
> > ctx.perf_fd = perf_open(&ctx);
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-21 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-20 18:26 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] i915/perf: 32bit printf cleanup Chris Wilson
2020-08-20 18:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/4] i915/gem_exec_fence: Cleanup 32bit printfs Chris Wilson
2020-08-20 18:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/4] i915/bb: " Chris Wilson
2020-08-20 18:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] i915/gem_exec_alignment: 32b printf cleanups Chris Wilson
2020-08-20 21:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] i915/perf: 32bit printf cleanup Lionel Landwerlin
2020-08-21 7:54 ` Petri Latvala [this message]
2020-08-21 8:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Lionel Landwerlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200821075449.GE7444@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=petri.latvala@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox