From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 03:18:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201003001846.1271151-6-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201003001846.1271151-1-imre.deak@intel.com>
Apply Display WA #22010492432 for combo PHY PLLs too. This should fix a
problem where the PLL output frequency is slightly off with the current
PLL fractional divider value.
I haven't seen an actual case where this causes a problem, but let's
follow the spec. It's also needed on some EHL platforms, but for that we
also need a way to distinguish the affected EHL SKUs, so I leave that
for a follow-up.
v2:
- Apply the WA at one place when calculating the PLL dividers from the
frequency and the frequency from the dividers for all the combo PLL
use cases (DP, HDMI, TBT). (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 41 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 61cb558c60d1..421176de5cfb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2636,11 +2636,22 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Display WA #22010492432: tgl
+ * Program half of the nominal DCO divider fraction value.
+ */
+static bool
+tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+ return IS_TIGERLAKE(i915) && i915->dpll.ref_clks.nssc == 38400;
+}
+
static int __cnl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
int ref_clock)
{
const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state = &pll->state.hw_state;
+ u32 dco_fraction;
u32 p0, p1, p2, dco_freq;
p0 = pll_state->cfgcr1 & DPLL_CFGCR1_PDIV_MASK;
@@ -2683,8 +2694,13 @@ static int __cnl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
dco_freq = (pll_state->cfgcr0 & DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_INTEGER_MASK) *
ref_clock;
- dco_freq += (((pll_state->cfgcr0 & DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_MASK) >>
- DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_SHIFT) * ref_clock) / 0x8000;
+ dco_fraction = (pll_state->cfgcr0 & DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_MASK) >>
+ DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION_SHIFT;
+
+ if (tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(dev_priv))
+ dco_fraction *= 2;
+
+ dco_freq += (dco_fraction * ref_clock) / 0x8000;
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, p0 == 0 || p1 == 0 || p2 == 0))
return 0;
@@ -2962,16 +2978,6 @@ static const struct skl_wrpll_params tgl_tbt_pll_24MHz_values = {
/* the following params are unused */
};
-/*
- * Display WA #22010492432: tgl
- * Divide the nominal .dco_fraction value by 2.
- */
-static const struct skl_wrpll_params tgl_tbt_pll_38_4MHz_values = {
- .dco_integer = 0x54, .dco_fraction = 0x1800,
- /* the following params are unused */
- .pdiv = 0, .kdiv = 0, .qdiv_mode = 0, .qdiv_ratio = 0,
-};
-
static bool icl_calc_dp_combo_pll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct skl_wrpll_params *pll_params)
{
@@ -3005,14 +3011,12 @@ static bool icl_calc_tbt_pll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
MISSING_CASE(dev_priv->dpll.ref_clks.nssc);
fallthrough;
case 19200:
+ case 38400:
*pll_params = tgl_tbt_pll_19_2MHz_values;
break;
case 24000:
*pll_params = tgl_tbt_pll_24MHz_values;
break;
- case 38400:
- *pll_params = tgl_tbt_pll_38_4MHz_values;
- break;
}
} else {
switch (dev_priv->dpll.ref_clks.nssc) {
@@ -3079,9 +3083,14 @@ static void icl_calc_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
const struct skl_wrpll_params *pll_params,
struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state)
{
+ u32 dco_fraction = pll_params->dco_fraction;
+
memset(pll_state, 0, sizeof(*pll_state));
- pll_state->cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(pll_params->dco_fraction) |
+ if (tgl_combo_pll_div_frac_wa_needed(i915))
+ dco_fraction = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dco_fraction, 2);
+
+ pll_state->cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(dco_fraction) |
pll_params->dco_integer;
pll_state->cfgcr1 = DPLL_CFGCR1_QDIV_RATIO(pll_params->qdiv_ratio) |
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-03 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-03 0:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock Imre Deak
2020-10-03 0:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/skl: Work around incorrect BIOS WRPLL PDIV programming Imre Deak
2020-10-05 20:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-05 20:26 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-05 23:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-06 1:24 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-06 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2020-10-06 8:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-03 0:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Move the initial fastset commit check to encoder hooks Imre Deak
2020-10-03 1:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2020-10-05 20:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-05 20:34 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-05 21:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2020-10-06 9:42 ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-06 9:55 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-06 10:00 ` Jani Nikula
2020-10-06 10:05 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-03 0:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Check for unsupported DP link rates during initial commit Imre Deak
2020-10-05 20:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-03 0:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Add an encoder hook to sanitize its state during init/resume Imre Deak
2020-10-05 20:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-05 20:46 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-05 23:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-05 20:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-05 20:57 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-05 20:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-05 23:00 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-05 21:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2020-10-05 23:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2020-10-06 8:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-10-03 0:18 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2020-10-03 0:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock (rev2) Patchwork
2020-10-03 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-03 1:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock (rev3) Patchwork
2020-10-03 1:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-03 3:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-03 13:48 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-04 6:12 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2020-10-04 5:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-06 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock (rev6) Patchwork
2020-10-06 0:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-06 1:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock (rev7) Patchwork
2020-10-06 2:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-06 2:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock (rev6) Patchwork
2020-10-06 10:32 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-06 11:04 ` Imre Deak
2020-10-06 5:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/tgl: Fix Combo PHY DPLL fractional divider for 38.4MHz ref clock (rev7) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201003001846.1271151-6-imre.deak@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox