Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_vdd_off_sync
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:17:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201229064751.GD11717@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511ebda7b1fe5402e0312b20f7cf642318da9132.1608648128.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On 2020-12-22 at 20:19:46 +0530, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add a locked version of intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked() that does
> everything the callers expect it to.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c  | 31 +++---------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 17 ++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index f2794cc4292a..1a34c9351c30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -5809,17 +5809,8 @@ void intel_dp_encoder_flush_work(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
>  
>  	intel_dp_mst_encoder_cleanup(dig_port);
> -	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> -		intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  
> -		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&intel_dp->panel_vdd_work);
> -		/*
> -		 * vdd might still be enabled do to the delayed vdd off.
> -		 * Make sure vdd is actually turned off here.
> -		 */
> -		with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> -			intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> -	}
> +	intel_pps_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>  
>  	intel_dp_aux_fini(intel_dp);
>  }
> @@ -5835,18 +5826,8 @@ static void intel_dp_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>  void intel_dp_encoder_suspend(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder)
>  {
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(intel_encoder);
> -	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> -
> -	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> -		return;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * vdd might still be enabled do to the delayed vdd off.
> -	 * Make sure vdd is actually turned off here.
> -	 */
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&intel_dp->panel_vdd_work);
> -	with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> -		intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>  }
>  
>  void intel_dp_encoder_shutdown(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder)
> @@ -6700,13 +6681,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	return true;
>  
>  out_vdd_off:
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&intel_dp->panel_vdd_work);
> -	/*
> -	 * vdd might still be enabled do to the delayed vdd off.
> -	 * Make sure vdd is actually turned off here.
> -	 */
> -	with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> -		intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> index 01c9e69f4e3a..acd6d0092bc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.name);
>  }
>  
> -void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> @@ -682,6 +682,21 @@ void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  				fetch_and_zero(&intel_dp->vdd_wakeref));
>  }
>  
> +void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&intel_dp->panel_vdd_work);
> +	/*
> +	 * vdd might still be enabled do to the delayed vdd off.
	I belive there is a typo here "do -> due"
Thanks,
Anshuman.
> +	 * Make sure vdd is actually turned off here.
> +	 */
> +	with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> +		intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> +}
> +
>  void edp_panel_vdd_work(struct work_struct *__work)
>  {
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp =
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> index e7f0473be9a7..3cab183658c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ void intel_pps_backlight_power(struct intel_connector *connector, bool enable);
>  
>  bool intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync);
> -void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void edp_panel_vdd_work(struct work_struct *__work);
> @@ -38,6 +37,7 @@ void intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  bool intel_pps_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
>  void wait_panel_power_cycle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-29  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-22 14:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract panel power sequencer from intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2020-12-28 11:22   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-04 14:46     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44       ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915/pps: rename pps_{, un}lock -> intel_pps_{, un}lock Jani Nikula
2020-12-28 10:57   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_backlight_* to intel_pps_backlight_* Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:12   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_* Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:15   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:45     ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915/pps: rename edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*_unlocked Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:35   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_vdd_off_sync Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:47   ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2021-01-08 17:46     ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/pps: add higher level intel_pps_init() call Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:53   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_reinit() Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:59   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_check_edp to intel_pps_check_power_unlocked Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:04   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 10:33     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 10:59       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_power_sequencer_reset to intel_pps_reset_all Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:53   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/pps: add locked intel_pps_wait_power_cycle Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:59   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915/pps: rename vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer to vlv_pps_init Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  8:01   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915/dp: split out aux functionality to intel_dp_aux.c Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 15:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Patchwork
2020-12-22 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-12-22 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201229064751.GD11717@intel.com \
    --to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox