Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_check_edp to intel_pps_check_power_unlocked
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:34:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201229070456.GG11717@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5a60c020b4f9277de1276b2d6010119a5f072ab.1608648128.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On 2020-12-22 at 20:19:49 +0530, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Follow the usual naming pattern for functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 334ba1775cd3..65406d4ccdbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	 */
>  	cpu_latency_qos_update_request(&i915->pm_qos, 0);
>  
> -	intel_dp_check_edp(intel_dp);
> +	intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/* Try to wait for any previous AUX channel activity */
>  	for (try = 0; try < 3; try++) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> index 3e62d1450682..dfd6722bc40e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static bool edp_have_panel_vdd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	return intel_de_read(dev_priv, _pp_ctrl_reg(intel_dp)) & EDP_FORCE_VDD;
>  }
>  
> -void intel_dp_check_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
IMHO comment to take pps_lock would be useful here.
Thanks,
Anshuman.
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> index 4780b59a59df..8dda282abd42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_pps_unlock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, intel_wakeref_t wake
>  #define with_intel_pps_lock(dp, wf)						\
>  	for ((wf) = intel_pps_lock(dp); (wf); (wf) = intel_pps_unlock((dp), (wf)))
>  
> -void intel_dp_check_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_backlight_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_backlight_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_backlight_power(struct intel_connector *connector, bool enable);
> @@ -31,6 +30,7 @@ bool intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync);
>  void intel_pps_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
>  void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-29  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-22 14:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract panel power sequencer from intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2020-12-28 11:22   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-04 14:46     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44       ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915/pps: rename pps_{, un}lock -> intel_pps_{, un}lock Jani Nikula
2020-12-28 10:57   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_backlight_* to intel_pps_backlight_* Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:12   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_* Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:15   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:45     ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915/pps: rename edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*_unlocked Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:35   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_vdd_off_sync Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:47   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:46     ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/pps: add higher level intel_pps_init() call Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:53   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_reinit() Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  6:59   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_check_edp to intel_pps_check_power_unlocked Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:04   ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2021-01-08 10:33     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 10:59       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_power_sequencer_reset to intel_pps_reset_all Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:53   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/pps: add locked intel_pps_wait_power_cycle Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  7:59   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915/pps: rename vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer to vlv_pps_init Jani Nikula
2020-12-29  8:01   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-12-22 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915/dp: split out aux functionality to intel_dp_aux.c Jani Nikula
2020-12-22 15:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Patchwork
2020-12-22 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-12-22 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201229070456.GG11717@intel.com \
    --to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox