From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:09:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210113103926.GL11717@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b858271bd4d9c4a2ce15a13301d7bd9f7d121eb5.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On 2021-01-08 at 19:44:12 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Follow the usual naming pattern for functions. We don't need to repeat
> "panel" here. No functional changes.
>
> v2: Fix comment (Anshuman)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 11 +++++------
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index f09a597bf730..243ab635aa34 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3592,7 +3592,7 @@ static void tgl_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> */
>
> /* 2. Enable Panel Power if PPS is required */
> - intel_edp_panel_on(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_on(intel_dp);
>
> /*
> * 3. For non-TBT Type-C ports, set FIA lane count
> @@ -3735,7 +3735,7 @@ static void hsw_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> crtc_state->port_clock,
> crtc_state->lane_count);
>
> - intel_edp_panel_on(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_on(intel_dp);
>
> intel_ddi_clk_select(encoder, crtc_state);
>
> @@ -3977,8 +3977,8 @@ static void intel_ddi_post_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)
> intel_ddi_disable_pipe_clock(old_crtc_state);
>
> - intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> - intel_edp_panel_off(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_off(intel_dp);
>
> if (!intel_phy_is_tc(dev_priv, phy) ||
> dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_TBT_ALT)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 421e68bb436f..eac674ad91c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3001,10 +3001,10 @@ static void intel_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> /* Make sure the panel is off before trying to change the mode. But also
> * ensure that we have vdd while we switch off the panel. */
> - intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> intel_edp_backlight_off(old_conn_state);
> intel_dp_set_power(intel_dp, DP_SET_POWER_D3);
> - intel_edp_panel_off(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_off(intel_dp);
> intel_dp->frl.is_trained = false;
> intel_dp->frl.trained_rate_gbps = 0;
> }
> @@ -6339,7 +6339,7 @@ void intel_dp_encoder_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> * something nasty with it.
> */
> intel_dp_pps_init(intel_dp);
> - intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -6513,7 +6513,7 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool long_hpd)
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
>
> if (dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP &&
> - (long_hpd || !intel_edp_have_power(intel_dp))) {
> + (long_hpd || !intel_pps_have_power(intel_dp))) {
> /*
> * vdd off can generate a long/short pulse on eDP which
> * would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we
> @@ -7071,7 +7071,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref) {
> intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(intel_dp);
> intel_dp_pps_init(intel_dp);
> - intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(intel_dp);
> }
>
> /* Cache DPCD and EDID for edp. */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> index 36d8782d8df1..59215cfd7d97 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static u32 ilk_get_pp_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> /*
> * Must be paired with edp_panel_vdd_off().
> * Must hold pps_mutex around the whole on/off sequence.
> - * Can be nested with intel_edp_panel_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> + * Can be nested with intel_pps_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> */
> bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> @@ -616,13 +616,12 @@ bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Must be paired with intel_edp_panel_vdd_off() or
> - * intel_edp_panel_off().
> + * Must be paired with intel_pps_off().
> * Nested calls to these functions are not allowed since
> * we drop the lock. Caller must use some higher level
> * locking to prevent nested calls from other threads.
> */
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> bool vdd;
> @@ -708,7 +707,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> /*
> * Must be paired with edp_panel_vdd_on().
> * Must hold pps_mutex around the whole on/off sequence.
> - * Can be nested with intel_edp_panel_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> + * Can be nested with intel_pps_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> */
> void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
> {
> @@ -780,7 +779,7 @@ void edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> }
> }
>
> -void intel_edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>
> @@ -832,7 +831,7 @@ void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> fetch_and_zero(&intel_dp->vdd_wakeref));
> }
>
> -void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>
> @@ -1025,7 +1024,7 @@ void vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(intel_dp, true);
> }
>
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -1050,7 +1049,7 @@ void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(intel_dp);
> }
>
> -bool intel_edp_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +bool intel_pps_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> bool have_power = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> index 81e4e9fc3cf5..69f670678d0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> @@ -34,12 +34,11 @@ void edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void edp_panel_vdd_work(struct work_struct *__work);
>
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -void intel_edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -bool intel_edp_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -
> -void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +bool intel_pps_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>
> void wait_panel_power_cycle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 17:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/17] drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract panel power sequencer from intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 15:34 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 16:47 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/17] drm/i915/pps: rename pps_{, un}lock -> intel_pps_{, un}lock Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_backlight_* to intel_pps_backlight_* Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_* Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:39 ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/17] drm/i915/pps: rename edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*_unlocked Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:41 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_vdd_off_sync Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:42 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/17] drm/i915/pps: add higher level intel_pps_init() call Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_encoder_reset() Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_check_edp to intel_pps_check_power_unlocked Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_power_sequencer_reset to intel_pps_reset_all Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/17] drm/i915/pps: add locked intel_pps_wait_power_cycle Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/17] drm/i915/pps: rename vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer to vlv_pps_init Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer* functions Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:02 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14 8:31 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:44 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-20 4:20 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/pps: move pps code over from intel_display.c and refactor Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:55 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14 8:56 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-20 4:22 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/17] drm/i915/dp: abstract struct intel_dp pps members to a sub-struct Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:58 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/17] drm/i915/dp: split out aux functionality to intel_dp_aux.c Jani Nikula
2021-01-20 4:44 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 19:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux (rev2) Patchwork
2021-01-08 19:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-08 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-09 1:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210113103926.GL11717@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox