public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/pps: move pps code over from intel_display.c and refactor
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:56:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6tbrj5j.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113115541.GQ11717@intel.com>

On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
> On 2021-01-08 at 19:44:23 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> intel_display.c has some pps functions that belong to intel_pps.c. Move
>> them over.
>> 
>> While at it, refactor the duplicate intel_pps_init() in intel_display.c
>> into an orthogonal intel_pps_setup() in intel_pps.c, and call it earlier
>> in intel_modeset_init_nogem().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 41 ++------------------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  1 -
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c     | 34 ++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h     |  3 ++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c              |  1 +
>>  5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 0189d379a55e..f8806c4ecb21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
>>  #include "intel_overlay.h"
>>  #include "intel_pipe_crc.h"
>>  #include "intel_pm.h"
>> +#include "intel_pps.h"
>>  #include "intel_psr.h"
>>  #include "intel_quirks.h"
>>  #include "intel_sideband.h"
>> @@ -16100,48 +16101,12 @@ static bool intel_ddi_crt_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>>  
>> -void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> -{
>> -	int pps_num;
>> -	int pps_idx;
>> -
>> -	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
>> -		return;
>> -	/*
>> -	 * This w/a is needed at least on CPT/PPT, but to be sure apply it
>> -	 * everywhere where registers can be write protected.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> -		pps_num = 2;
>> -	else
>> -		pps_num = 1;
>> -
>> -	for (pps_idx = 0; pps_idx < pps_num; pps_idx++) {
>> -		u32 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx));
>> -
>> -		val = (val & ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
>> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx), val);
>> -	}
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void intel_pps_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> -{
>> -	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
>> -		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = PCH_PPS_BASE;
>> -	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> -		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = VLV_PPS_BASE;
>> -	else
>> -		dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = PPS_BASE;
>> -
>> -	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  {
>>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>>  	bool dpd_is_edp = false;
>>  
>> -	intel_pps_init(dev_priv);
>> +	intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>>  
>>  	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
>>  		return;
>> @@ -17199,6 +17164,8 @@ int intel_modeset_init_nogem(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>  
>>  	intel_panel_sanitize_ssc(i915);
>>  
>> +	intel_pps_setup(i915);
>> +
> This is mmio init, could you please guide me why i915_driver_mmio_probe()
> has not chosen to call intel_pps_setup() ?

Long term the goal is to divide gt and display probe more and more;
there's no clear place in i915_driver_mmio_probe() to stick this. I
certainly don't want to call intel_pps_setup() directly from there.

This is at least close to where gpio_mmio_base gets setup in
intel_gmbus_setup() right below.

BR,
Jani.

>>  	intel_gmbus_setup(i915);
>>  
>>  	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%d display pipe%s available.\n",
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> index 7ddbc00a0f41..bbd5dbc61ce9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> @@ -546,7 +546,6 @@ unsigned int intel_rotation_info_size(const struct intel_rotation_info *rot_info
>>  unsigned int intel_remapped_info_size(const struct intel_remapped_info *rem_info);
>>  bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>  int intel_display_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
>> -void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>  void intel_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
>>  struct drm_display_mode *
>>  intel_encoder_current_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> index b4d026ca3313..c3a0fc933500 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> @@ -1370,3 +1370,37 @@ void intel_pps_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>  
>>  	intel_pps_encoder_reset(intel_dp);
>>  }
>> +
>> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +	int pps_num;
>> +	int pps_idx;
>> +
>> +	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
>> +		return;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This w/a is needed at least on CPT/PPT, but to be sure apply it
>> +	 * everywhere where registers can be write protected.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> +		pps_num = 2;
>> +	else
>> +		pps_num = 1;
>> +
>> +	for (pps_idx = 0; pps_idx < pps_num; pps_idx++) {
>> +		u32 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx));
>> +
>> +		val = (val & ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
>> +		intel_de_write(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx), val);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +void intel_pps_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +{
>> +	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(i915) || IS_GEN9_LP(i915))
>> +		i915->pps_mmio_base = PCH_PPS_BASE;
>> +	else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
>> +		i915->pps_mmio_base = VLV_PPS_BASE;
>> +	else
>> +		i915->pps_mmio_base = PPS_BASE;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
>> index 22045c5cdc86..fbbcca782e7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
>> @@ -46,4 +46,7 @@ void intel_pps_reset_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>>  void vlv_pps_init(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  		  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>  
>> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> +void intel_pps_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> +
>>  #endif /* __INTEL_PPS_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> index 3e504247f2da..7282c8f08318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>>  #include "display/intel_hotplug.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_overlay.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_pipe_crc.h"
>> +#include "display/intel_pps.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_sprite.h"
>>  #include "display/intel_vga.h"
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-08 17:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/17] drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract panel power sequencer from intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 15:34   ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 16:47   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/17] drm/i915/pps: rename pps_{, un}lock -> intel_pps_{, un}lock Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_backlight_* to intel_pps_backlight_* Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_* Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:39   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/17] drm/i915/pps: rename edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*_unlocked Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:41   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_vdd_off_sync Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:42   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/17] drm/i915/pps: add higher level intel_pps_init() call Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_encoder_reset() Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_check_edp to intel_pps_check_power_unlocked Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_power_sequencer_reset to intel_pps_reset_all Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/17] drm/i915/pps: add locked intel_pps_wait_power_cycle Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/17] drm/i915/pps: rename vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer to vlv_pps_init Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer* functions Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:02   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14  8:31     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:44   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14  8:46     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-20  4:20       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/pps: move pps code over from intel_display.c and refactor Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:55   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14  8:56     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-01-20  4:22       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/17] drm/i915/dp: abstract struct intel_dp pps members to a sub-struct Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:58   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/17] drm/i915/dp: split out aux functionality to intel_dp_aux.c Jani Nikula
2021-01-20  4:44   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 19:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux (rev2) Patchwork
2021-01-08 19:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-08 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-09  1:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a6tbrj5j.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox