From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/pps: move pps code over from intel_display.c and refactor
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:25:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210113115541.GQ11717@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f190c7dadbf4e3d2b216709975fdd50ba0f850d0.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On 2021-01-08 at 19:44:23 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> intel_display.c has some pps functions that belong to intel_pps.c. Move
> them over.
>
> While at it, refactor the duplicate intel_pps_init() in intel_display.c
> into an orthogonal intel_pps_setup() in intel_pps.c, and call it earlier
> in intel_modeset_init_nogem().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 41 ++------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 0189d379a55e..f8806c4ecb21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
> #include "intel_overlay.h"
> #include "intel_pipe_crc.h"
> #include "intel_pm.h"
> +#include "intel_pps.h"
> #include "intel_psr.h"
> #include "intel_quirks.h"
> #include "intel_sideband.h"
> @@ -16100,48 +16101,12 @@ static bool intel_ddi_crt_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return true;
> }
>
> -void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - int pps_num;
> - int pps_idx;
> -
> - if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> - return;
> - /*
> - * This w/a is needed at least on CPT/PPT, but to be sure apply it
> - * everywhere where registers can be write protected.
> - */
> - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> - pps_num = 2;
> - else
> - pps_num = 1;
> -
> - for (pps_idx = 0; pps_idx < pps_num; pps_idx++) {
> - u32 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx));
> -
> - val = (val & ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
> - intel_de_write(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx), val);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -static void intel_pps_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = PCH_PPS_BASE;
> - else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = VLV_PPS_BASE;
> - else
> - dev_priv->pps_mmio_base = PPS_BASE;
> -
> - intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
> -}
> -
> static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> bool dpd_is_edp = false;
>
> - intel_pps_init(dev_priv);
> + intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
>
> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
> return;
> @@ -17199,6 +17164,8 @@ int intel_modeset_init_nogem(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>
> intel_panel_sanitize_ssc(i915);
>
> + intel_pps_setup(i915);
> +
This is mmio init, could you please guide me why i915_driver_mmio_probe()
has not chosen to call intel_pps_setup() ?
> intel_gmbus_setup(i915);
>
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%d display pipe%s available.\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index 7ddbc00a0f41..bbd5dbc61ce9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -546,7 +546,6 @@ unsigned int intel_rotation_info_size(const struct intel_rotation_info *rot_info
> unsigned int intel_remapped_info_size(const struct intel_remapped_info *rem_info);
> bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int intel_display_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
> -void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
> struct drm_display_mode *
> intel_encoder_current_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> index b4d026ca3313..c3a0fc933500 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> @@ -1370,3 +1370,37 @@ void intel_pps_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> intel_pps_encoder_reset(intel_dp);
> }
> +
> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + int pps_num;
> + int pps_idx;
> +
> + if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> + return;
> + /*
> + * This w/a is needed at least on CPT/PPT, but to be sure apply it
> + * everywhere where registers can be write protected.
> + */
> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> + pps_num = 2;
> + else
> + pps_num = 1;
> +
> + for (pps_idx = 0; pps_idx < pps_num; pps_idx++) {
> + u32 val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx));
> +
> + val = (val & ~PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS;
> + intel_de_write(dev_priv, PP_CONTROL(pps_idx), val);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void intel_pps_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(i915) || IS_GEN9_LP(i915))
> + i915->pps_mmio_base = PCH_PPS_BASE;
> + else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
> + i915->pps_mmio_base = VLV_PPS_BASE;
> + else
> + i915->pps_mmio_base = PPS_BASE;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> index 22045c5cdc86..fbbcca782e7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> @@ -46,4 +46,7 @@ void intel_pps_reset_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> void vlv_pps_init(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>
> +void intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +void intel_pps_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +
> #endif /* __INTEL_PPS_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 3e504247f2da..7282c8f08318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> #include "display/intel_hotplug.h"
> #include "display/intel_overlay.h"
> #include "display/intel_pipe_crc.h"
> +#include "display/intel_pps.h"
> #include "display/intel_sprite.h"
> #include "display/intel_vga.h"
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 17:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/17] drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract panel power sequencer from intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 15:34 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 16:47 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/17] drm/i915/pps: rename pps_{, un}lock -> intel_pps_{, un}lock Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_backlight_* to intel_pps_backlight_* Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_edp_panel_* to intel_pps_* Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:39 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/17] drm/i915/pps: rename edp_panel_* to intel_pps_*_unlocked Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:41 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_vdd_off_sync Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 10:42 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/17] drm/i915/pps: add higher level intel_pps_init() call Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/17] drm/i915/pps: abstract intel_pps_encoder_reset() Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_check_edp to intel_pps_check_power_unlocked Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_power_sequencer_reset to intel_pps_reset_all Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/17] drm/i915/pps: add locked intel_pps_wait_power_cycle Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/17] drm/i915/pps: rename vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer to vlv_pps_init Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/17] drm/i915/pps: rename intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer* functions Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:02 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14 8:31 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/17] drm/i915/pps: refactor init abstractions Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:44 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-14 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-20 4:20 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/pps: move pps code over from intel_display.c and refactor Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:55 ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2021-01-14 8:56 ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-20 4:22 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/17] drm/i915/dp: abstract struct intel_dp pps members to a sub-struct Jani Nikula
2021-01-13 11:58 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-08 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/17] drm/i915/dp: split out aux functionality to intel_dp_aux.c Jani Nikula
2021-01-20 4:44 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-08 19:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: split out pps and aux (rev2) Patchwork
2021-01-08 19:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-08 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-09 1:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210113115541.GQ11717@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox