From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Gupta, Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:04:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205120451.GA921144@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa661df54d8847d0926e8edf61710fcf@intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:16:30AM +0200, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 11:58 PM
> > To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL
> > check
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:30:43PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> > > DP-MST connector encoder initializes at modeset Adding a
> > > connector->encoder NULL check in order to avoid any NULL pointer
> > > dereference.
> > > intel_hdcp_enable() already handle this but debugfs can also invoke
> > > the intel_{hdcp,hdcp2_capable}.
> > > Handling it gracefully.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > index ae1371c36a32..58af323d189a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > @@ -135,11 +135,16 @@ int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct
> > > intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > > /* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Sink */ bool
> > > intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector) {
> > > - struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> > intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
> > > const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = connector->hdcp.shim;
> > > bool capable = false;
> > > u8 bksv[5];
> > >
> > > + if (!connector->encoder)
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> >
> > I assume this is needed when called from i915_hdcp_sink_capability
> > debugfs entry. That one is lacking the locking for the connector,
> > but is that entry really needed? We print the same info already from
> > the i915_display_info entry which has the proper locking and encoder
> > check.
>
> Historically HDCP capability added to i915_display_info later to debug
> CI machine as i915_display_info available as CI logs. Now the plans
> i915_display_info should only show the monitor capability. and
> i915_hdcp_sink_capability will check both sink and platform
> capability.
Ok, in any case the encoder NULL check and the required locking should
be done in i915_hdcp_sink_capability_show().
>
> Thanks,
> Anshuman Gupta.
> >
> > > +
> > > + dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > +
> > > if (!shim)
> > > return capable;
> > >
> > > @@ -156,11 +161,16 @@ bool intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector
> > > *connector)
> > > /* Is HDCP2.2 capable on Platform and Sink */ bool
> > > intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector) {
> > > - struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> > intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> > > struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> > > bool capable = false;
> > >
> > > + if (!connector->encoder)
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > +
> > > /* I915 support for HDCP2.2 */
> > > if (!hdcp->hdcp2_supported)
> > > return false;
> > > --
> > > 2.26.2
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-29 8:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-29 10:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-01-29 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 10:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-02-01 10:57 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-04 18:28 ` Imre Deak
2021-02-05 8:16 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-05 12:04 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2021-02-05 12:12 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-09 5:39 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-09 10:27 ` Imre Deak
2021-02-11 6:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-11 11:48 ` Imre Deak
2021-02-11 7:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check (rev2) Patchwork
2021-02-11 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-11 14:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-11 15:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check (rev3) Patchwork
2021-02-11 16:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-12 3:45 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-12 6:26 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-02-12 10:01 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-12 5:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210205120451.GA921144@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox