Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gupta, Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: "Deak, Imre" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:12:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aabf782fb5f44932ac7e314ae727b119@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205120451.GA921144@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 5:35 PM
> To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL
> check
> 
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:16:30AM +0200, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 11:58 PM
> > > To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability
> > > enc NULL check
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:30:43PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> > > > DP-MST connector encoder initializes at modeset Adding a
> > > > connector->encoder NULL check in order to avoid any NULL pointer
> > > > dereference.
> > > > intel_hdcp_enable() already handle this but debugfs can also
> > > > invoke the intel_{hdcp,hdcp2_capable}.
> > > > Handling it gracefully.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > index ae1371c36a32..58af323d189a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > @@ -135,11 +135,16 @@ int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct
> > > > intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > > >  /* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Sink */  bool
> > > > intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)  {
> > > > -	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> > > intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > > +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
> > > >  	const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = connector->hdcp.shim;
> > > >  	bool capable = false;
> > > >  	u8 bksv[5];
> > > >
> > > > +	if (!connector->encoder)
> > > > +		return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > I assume this is needed when called from i915_hdcp_sink_capability
> > > debugfs entry. That one is lacking the locking for the connector,
> > > but is that entry really needed? We print the same info already from
> > > the i915_display_info entry which has the proper locking and encoder
> > > check.
> >
> > Historically HDCP capability added to i915_display_info later to debug
> > CI machine as i915_display_info available as CI logs.  Now the plans
> > i915_display_info  should only show the monitor capability.  and
> > i915_hdcp_sink_capability will check both sink and platform
> > capability.
> 
> Ok, in any case the encoder NULL check and the required locking should be done
> in i915_hdcp_sink_capability_show().
Thanks Imre for review I will send a v2 patch.
Thanks,
Anshuman Gupta.
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anshuman Gupta.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +	dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (!shim)
> > > >  		return capable;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -156,11 +161,16 @@ bool intel_hdcp_capable(struct
> > > > intel_connector
> > > > *connector)
> > > >  /* Is HDCP2.2 capable on Platform and Sink */  bool
> > > > intel_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)  {
> > > > -	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> > > intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > > +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
> > > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> > > >  	struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &connector->hdcp;
> > > >  	bool capable = false;
> > > >
> > > > +	if (!connector->encoder)
> > > > +		return -ENODEV;
> > > > +
> > > > +	dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > > +
> > > >  	/* I915 support for HDCP2.2 */
> > > >  	if (!hdcp->hdcp2_supported)
> > > >  		return false;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.26.2
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-29  8:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-29 10:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-01-29 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 10:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-02-01 10:57   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-04 18:28 ` Imre Deak
2021-02-05  8:16   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-05 12:04     ` Imre Deak
2021-02-05 12:12       ` Gupta, Anshuman [this message]
2021-02-09  5:39         ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-09 10:27           ` Imre Deak
2021-02-11  6:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-11 11:48   ` Imre Deak
2021-02-11  7:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check (rev2) Patchwork
2021-02-11 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-11 14:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-11 15:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check (rev3) Patchwork
2021-02-11 16:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-12  3:45   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-12  6:26     ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-02-12 10:01       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-12  5:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aabf782fb5f44932ac7e314ae727b119@intel.com \
    --to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox