From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Gupta, Anshuman" <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, g@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:27:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209102711.GA18480@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c3fa41298ad4534afd0eee40ed6e4c6@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 07:39:17AM +0200, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > > index ae1371c36a32..58af323d189a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > > > > > @@ -135,11 +135,16 @@ int intel_hdcp_read_valid_bksv(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > > > > > /* Is HDCP1.4 capable on Platform and Sink */
> > > > > > bool intel_hdcp_capable(struct intel_connector *connector) {
> > > > > > - struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> > > > > > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port;
> > > > > > const struct intel_hdcp_shim *shim = connector->hdcp.shim;
> > > > > > bool capable = false;
> > > > > > u8 bksv[5];
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + if (!connector->encoder)
> > > > > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > > >
> > > > > I assume this is needed when called from i915_hdcp_sink_capability
> > > > > debugfs entry. That one is lacking the locking for the connector,
> > > > > but is that entry really needed? We print the same info already
> > > > > from the i915_display_info entry which has the proper locking and
> > > > > encoder check.
> > > >
> > > > Historically HDCP capability added to i915_display_info later to
> > > > debug CI machine as i915_display_info available as CI logs. Now the
> > > > plans i915_display_info should only show the monitor capability.
> > > > and i915_hdcp_sink_capability will check both sink and platform
> > > > capability.
> > >
> > > Ok, in any case the encoder NULL check and the required locking should
> > > be done in i915_hdcp_sink_capability_show().
>
> Need one input, AFAIU we do require
> drm_modeset_lock(&dev_priv->drm.mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL)
> lock in i915_hdcp_sink_capability ?
Yes, and there's also drm_modeset_lock_single_interruptible() that could
be used.
--Imre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-29 8:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check Anshuman Gupta
2021-01-29 10:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-01-29 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 10:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-02-01 10:57 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-04 18:28 ` Imre Deak
2021-02-05 8:16 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-05 12:04 ` Imre Deak
2021-02-05 12:12 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-09 5:39 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-09 10:27 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2021-02-11 6:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-11 11:48 ` Imre Deak
2021-02-11 7:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check (rev2) Patchwork
2021-02-11 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-11 14:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-11 15:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/debugfs: HDCP capability enc NULL check (rev3) Patchwork
2021-02-11 16:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-12 3:45 ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-02-12 6:26 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-02-12 10:01 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-02-12 5:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210209102711.GA18480@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=g@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox