public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup
Date: Wed,  7 Jul 2021 22:38:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210708053819.2120187-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)

PCI revision IDs don't always map to GT and display IP steppings in an
intuitive/sensible way.  On many of our recent platforms we've switched
to using revid->stepping lookup tables with the infrastructure in
intel_step.c to handle stepping lookups and comparisons.  Since it's
confusing to have some of our platforms using the new lookup tables and
some still using old revid comparisons, let's migrate all the old
platforms over to the table approach since that's what we want to
standardize on going forward.  The only place that revision ID's should
really get used directly now is when checking to see if we're running on
pre-production hardware.

Let's also take the opportunity to drop a bit of effectively dead code
in the workarounds file too.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>

Matt Roper (7):
  drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison
  drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables
  drm/i915/icl: Use revid->stepping tables
  drm/i915/jsl_ehl: Use revid->stepping tables
  drm/i915/rkl: Use revid->stepping tables
  drm/i915/dg1: Use revid->stepping tables
  drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds

 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |  4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c   | 81 +++----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c               |  8 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               | 80 +++---------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c             | 72 +++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h             |  7 ++
 10 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-08  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-08  5:38 Matt Roper [this message]
2021-07-08  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-08 18:08   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:43     ` Matt Roper
2021-07-12 21:02       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-12 21:08       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-08 18:11   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08  5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-08  5:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Patchwork
2021-07-08  5:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-08  6:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-08  7:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] " Jani Nikula
2021-07-08 18:37   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08 23:05     ` Matt Roper
2021-07-08 23:08       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08 10:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210708053819.2120187-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox