From: "Srivatsa, Anusha" <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
To: "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 18:08:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf223bb32e3f4ab49c3e1553b247aad2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210708053819.2120187-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Matt Roper
> Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 10:38 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection
> use direct revid comparison
>
> Although we're converting our workarounds to use a revid->stepping lookup
> table, the function that detects pre-production hardware should continue to
> compare against PCI revision ID values directly. These are listed in the bspec
> as integers, so it's easier to confirm their correctness if we just use an integer
> literal rather than a symbolic name anyway.
>
> Since the BXT, GLK, and CNL revid macros were never used in any
> workaround code, just remove them completely.
>
> Bspec: 13620, 19131, 13626, 18329
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 24 ------------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index 30d8cd8c69b1..90136995f5eb
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ static void intel_detect_preproduction_hw(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> bool pre = false;
>
> pre |= IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv);
> - pre |= IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, SKL_REVID_F0);
> - pre |= IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_B_LAST);
> - pre |= IS_KBL_GT_STEP(dev_priv, 0, STEP_A0);
> - pre |= IS_GLK_REVID(dev_priv, 0, GLK_REVID_A2);
> + pre |= IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x6;
> + pre |= IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0xA;
> + pre |= IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x1;
> + pre |= IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x3;
>
> if (pre) {
> drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "This is a pre-production stepping.
> "
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 6dff4ca01241..796e6838bc79
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1473,35 +1473,11 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private
> *i915,
>
> #define IS_SKL_REVID(p, since, until) (IS_SKYLAKE(p) && IS_REVID(p, since,
> until))
>
> -#define BXT_REVID_A0 0x0
> -#define BXT_REVID_A1 0x1
> -#define BXT_REVID_B0 0x3
> -#define BXT_REVID_B_LAST 0x8
> -#define BXT_REVID_C0 0x9
> -
> -#define IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, since, until) \
> - (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && IS_REVID(dev_priv, since, until))
Here, we can have IS_BXT_GT_STEP, similar to other platform and use in intel_detect_preproduction_hw() above.
Same for other platforms - SKL and GLK. KBL already uses IS_KBL_GT_STEP.
Anusha
> #define IS_KBL_GT_STEP(dev_priv, since, until) \
> (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && IS_GT_STEP(dev_priv, since, until))
> #define IS_KBL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, since, until) \
> (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && IS_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, since,
> until))
>
> -#define GLK_REVID_A0 0x0
> -#define GLK_REVID_A1 0x1
> -#define GLK_REVID_A2 0x2
> -#define GLK_REVID_B0 0x3
> -
> -#define IS_GLK_REVID(dev_priv, since, until) \
> - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) && IS_REVID(dev_priv, since, until))
> -
> -#define CNL_REVID_A0 0x0
> -#define CNL_REVID_B0 0x1
> -#define CNL_REVID_C0 0x2
> -
> -#define IS_CNL_REVID(p, since, until) \
> - (IS_CANNONLAKE(p) && IS_REVID(p, since, until))
> -
> #define ICL_REVID_A0 0x0
> #define ICL_REVID_A2 0x1
> #define ICL_REVID_B0 0x3
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> index 958a8bb5d677..8efacef6ab31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct intel_step_info { enum intel_step {
> STEP_NONE = 0,
> STEP_A0,
> + STEP_A1,
> STEP_A2,
> STEP_B0,
> STEP_B1,
> --
> 2.25.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-08 5:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Matt Roper
2021-07-08 5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-08 18:08 ` Srivatsa, Anusha [this message]
2021-07-10 3:43 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-12 21:02 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-12 21:08 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08 5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-08 18:11 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08 5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08 5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08 5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08 5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-08 5:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-08 5:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Patchwork
2021-07-08 5:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-08 6:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-08 7:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] " Jani Nikula
2021-07-08 18:37 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08 23:05 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-08 23:08 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-08 10:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf223bb32e3f4ab49c3e1553b247aad2@intel.com \
--to=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox