public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/46] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists
Date: Tue,  3 Aug 2021 15:29:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210803222943.27686-46-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210803222943.27686-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

A weak implementation of parallel submission (multi-bb execbuf IOCTL) for
execlists. Basically doing as little as possible to support this
interface for execlists - basically just passing submit fences between
each request generated and virtual engines are not allowed. This is on
par with what is there for the existing (hopefully soon deprecated)
bonding interface.

As with the GuC implementation the pinning interface laying is broken.
This will get cleaned up once the pre_pin / post_unpin laying violations
get fixed. Rather than try to fix it here, just do what the GuC is doing
in the meantime.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c   |   9 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       |   1 -
 .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c  | 201 +++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
index ac886b82796d..b199d59bd2c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -529,9 +529,6 @@ set_proto_ctx_engines_parallel_submit(struct i915_user_extension __user *base,
 	struct intel_engine_cs **siblings = NULL;
 	intel_engine_mask_t prev_mask;
 
-	if (!(intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&i915->gt.uc)))
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	if (get_user(slot, &ext->engine_index))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
@@ -541,6 +538,12 @@ set_proto_ctx_engines_parallel_submit(struct i915_user_extension __user *base,
 	if (get_user(num_siblings, &ext->num_siblings))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&i915->gt.uc) && num_siblings != 1) {
+		drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Only 1 sibling (%d) supported in non-GuC mode\n",
+			num_siblings);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	if (slot >= set->num_engines) {
 		drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Invalid placement value, %d >= %d\n",
 			slot, set->num_engines);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
index 2c07f5f22c94..8e90a4a0b7b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
@@ -627,7 +627,6 @@ void intel_context_bind_parent_child(struct intel_context *parent,
 	 * Callers responsibility to validate that this function is used
 	 * correctly but we use GEM_BUG_ON here ensure that they do.
 	 */
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_uses_guc(parent->engine));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_pinned(parent));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(parent));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_pinned(child));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index 769480e026bb..5e0f4983de75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -927,8 +927,7 @@ static void execlists_submit_ports(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 
 static bool ctx_single_port_submission(const struct intel_context *ce)
 {
-	return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT) &&
-		intel_context_force_single_submission(ce));
+	return intel_context_force_single_submission(ce);
 }
 
 static bool can_merge_ctx(const struct intel_context *prev,
@@ -2602,6 +2601,203 @@ static void execlists_context_cancel_request(struct intel_context *ce,
 				      current->comm);
 }
 
+static int execlists_parent_context_pre_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
+					    struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww)
+{
+	struct intel_context *child;
+	int err, i = 0, j = 0;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
+
+	for_each_child(ce, child) {
+		err = i915_active_acquire(&child->active);
+		if (unlikely(err))
+			goto unwind_active;
+		++i;
+	}
+
+	for_each_child(ce, child) {
+		err = __execlists_context_pre_pin(child, child->engine, ww);
+		if (unlikely(err))
+			goto unwind_pre_pin;
+		++j;
+	}
+
+	err = __execlists_context_pre_pin(ce, ce->engine, ww);
+	if (unlikely(err))
+		goto unwind_pre_pin;
+
+	return 0;
+
+unwind_pre_pin:
+	for_each_child(ce, child) {
+		if (!j--)
+			break;
+		lrc_post_unpin(child);
+	}
+
+unwind_active:
+	for_each_child(ce, child) {
+		if (!i--)
+			break;
+		i915_active_release(&child->active);
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void execlists_parent_context_post_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	struct intel_context *child;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
+
+	for_each_child(ce, child)
+		lrc_post_unpin(child);
+	lrc_post_unpin(ce);
+
+	for_each_child(ce, child) {
+		intel_context_get(child);
+		i915_active_release(&child->active);
+		intel_context_put(child);
+	}
+}
+
+static int execlists_parent_context_pin(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	int ret, i = 0, j = 0;
+	struct intel_context *child;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
+
+	for_each_child(ce, child) {
+		ret = lrc_pin(child, child->engine);
+		if (unlikely(ret))
+			goto unwind_pin;
+		++i;
+	}
+	ret = lrc_pin(ce, ce->engine);
+	if (unlikely(ret))
+		goto unwind_pin;
+
+	return 0;
+
+unwind_pin:
+	for_each_child(ce, child) {
+		if (++j > i)
+			break;
+		lrc_unpin(child);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void execlists_parent_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	struct intel_context *child;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
+
+	for_each_child(ce, child)
+		lrc_unpin(child);
+	lrc_unpin(ce);
+}
+
+static const struct intel_context_ops parent_context_ops = {
+	.flags = COPS_HAS_INFLIGHT,
+
+	.alloc = execlists_context_alloc,
+
+	.cancel_request = execlists_context_cancel_request,
+
+	.pre_pin = execlists_parent_context_pre_pin,
+	.pin = execlists_parent_context_pin,
+	.unpin = execlists_parent_context_unpin,
+	.post_unpin = execlists_parent_context_post_unpin,
+
+	.enter = intel_context_enter_engine,
+	.exit = intel_context_exit_engine,
+
+	.destroy = lrc_destroy,
+};
+
+static const struct intel_context_ops child_context_ops = {
+	.flags = COPS_HAS_INFLIGHT,
+
+	.alloc = execlists_context_alloc,
+
+	.cancel_request = execlists_context_cancel_request,
+
+	.enter = intel_context_enter_engine,
+	.exit = intel_context_exit_engine,
+
+	.destroy = lrc_destroy,
+};
+
+static struct intel_context *
+execlists_create_parallel(struct intel_engine_cs **engines,
+			  unsigned int num_siblings,
+			  unsigned int width)
+{
+	struct intel_engine_cs **siblings = NULL;
+	struct intel_context *parent = NULL, *ce, *err;
+	int i, j;
+	int ret;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(num_siblings != 1);
+
+	siblings = kmalloc_array(num_siblings,
+				 sizeof(*siblings),
+				 GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!siblings)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < width; ++i) {
+		for (j = 0; j < num_siblings; ++j)
+			siblings[j] = engines[i * num_siblings + j];
+
+		ce = intel_context_create(siblings[0]);
+		if (!ce) {
+			err = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+			goto unwind;
+		}
+
+		if (i == 0) {
+			parent = ce;
+		} else {
+			intel_context_bind_parent_child(parent, ce);
+			ret = intel_context_alloc_state(ce);
+			if (ret) {
+				err = ERR_PTR(ret);
+				goto unwind;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	intel_context_set_nopreempt(parent);
+	intel_context_set_single_submission(parent);
+	for_each_child(parent, ce) {
+		intel_context_set_nopreempt(ce);
+		intel_context_set_single_submission(ce);
+	}
+
+	parent->ops = &parent_context_ops;
+	for_each_child(parent, ce)
+		ce->ops = &child_context_ops;
+
+	kfree(siblings);
+	return parent;
+
+unwind:
+	if (parent) {
+		for_each_child(parent, ce)
+			intel_context_put(ce);
+		intel_context_put(parent);
+	}
+	kfree(siblings);
+	return err;
+}
+
 static const struct intel_context_ops execlists_context_ops = {
 	.flags = COPS_HAS_INFLIGHT,
 
@@ -2620,6 +2816,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops execlists_context_ops = {
 	.reset = lrc_reset,
 	.destroy = lrc_destroy,
 
+	.create_parallel = execlists_create_parallel,
 	.create_virtual = execlists_create_virtual,
 };
 
-- 
2.28.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-03 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-03 22:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/46] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/46] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/46] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/46] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-08-05  8:27   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/46] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-08-05  8:29   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/46] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/46] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/46] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/46] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/46] drm/i915: Add GT PM unpark worker Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/46] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:23   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:11     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  6:43       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10 21:29         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/46] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:27   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:20     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  6:47       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:47         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/46] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/46] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:28     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  6:49       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/46] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:30   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:37     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  6:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:55         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/46] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 14:40     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:45       ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 18:44     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  8:45       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC parent-child context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:17   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:58     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  8:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10  9:07         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 18:06           ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-12 14:45             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 14:52               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 18:23         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/46] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/46] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/46] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:31   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:03     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  9:12       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/46] drm/i915/guc: Add hang check to GuC submit engine Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:35   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  9:18       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/46] drm/i915/guc: Add guc_child_context_destroy Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:36   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:06     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/46] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:32   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 16:39     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:03       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/46] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:36   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:13     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10  9:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10  9:27         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10 17:29           ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-11 10:04             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:35               ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/46] drm/i915: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/46] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/46] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/46] drm/i915/guc: Extend GuC flow control selftest for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption " Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/46] drm/i915: Move secure execbuf check to execbuf2 Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/46] drm/i915: Move input/exec fence handling to i915_gem_execbuffer2 Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/46] drm/i915: Move output " Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/46] drm/i915: Return output fence from i915_gem_do_execbuffer Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/46] drm/i915: Store batch index in struct i915_execbuffer Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/46] drm/i915: Allow callers of i915_gem_do_execbuffer to override the batch index Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/46] drm/i915: Teach execbuf there can be more than one batch in the objects list Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/46] drm/i915: Only track object dependencies on first request Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/46] drm/i915: Force parallel contexts to use copy engine for reloc Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:39   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/46] drm/i915: Multi-batch execbuffer2 Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:02   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/46] drm/i915: Eliminate unnecessary VMA calls for multi-BB submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:07   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 17:12     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/46] drm/i915: Hold all parallel requests until last request, properly handle error Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/46] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/46] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/46] drm/i915/guc: Add delay before disabling scheduling on contexts Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:17   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-11  9:55       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:43         ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-12 14:04           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:26   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev2) Patchwork
2021-08-03 22:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-08-03 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-08-03 23:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-05  3:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210803222943.27686-46-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox