From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/46] drm/i915/guc: Add hang check to GuC submit engine
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 19:05:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210809190558.GA123848@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YRFLPfzsAgFqqytd@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 05:35:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 03:29:17PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > The heartbeat uses a single instance of a GuC submit engine (GSE) to do
> > the hang check. As such if a different GSE's state machine hangs, the
> > heartbeat cannot detect this hang. Add timer to each GSE which in turn
> > can disable all submissions if it is hung.
> >
> > Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
> > .../i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h | 3 ++
> > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > index afb9b4bb8971..2d8296bcc583 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > @@ -105,15 +105,21 @@ static bool tasklet_blocked(struct guc_submit_engine *gse)
> > return test_bit(GSE_STATE_TASKLET_BLOCKED, &gse->flags);
> > }
> >
> > +/* 2 seconds seems like a reasonable timeout waiting for a G2H */
> > +#define MAX_TASKLET_BLOCKED_NS 2000000000
> > static void set_tasklet_blocked(struct guc_submit_engine *gse)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_held(&gse->sched_engine.lock);
> > + hrtimer_start_range_ns(&gse->hang_timer,
> > + ns_to_ktime(MAX_TASKLET_BLOCKED_NS), 0,
> > + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
> > set_bit(GSE_STATE_TASKLET_BLOCKED, &gse->flags);
>
> So with drm/scheduler the reset handling is assumed to be
> single-threaded, and there's quite complex rules around that. I've
> recently worked with Boris Brezillion to clarify all this a bit and
> improve docs. Does this all still work in that glorious future? Might be
> good to at least sprinkle some comments/thoughts around in the commit
> message about the envisaged future direction for all this stuff, to keep
> people in the loop. Especially future people.
>
> Ofc plan is still to just largely land all this.
>
> Also: set_bit is an unordered atomic, which means you need barriers, which
> meanes ... *insert the full rant about justifying/documenting lockless
> algorithms from earlier *
>
lockdep_assert_held(&gse->sched_engine.lock);
Not lockless. Also spin locks act as barriers, right?
> But I think this all falls out with the removal of the guc-id allocation
> scheme?
Yes, this patch is getting deleted.
Matt
> -Daniel
>
> > }
> >
> > static void __clr_tasklet_blocked(struct guc_submit_engine *gse)
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_held(&gse->sched_engine.lock);
> > + hrtimer_cancel(&gse->hang_timer);
> > clear_bit(GSE_STATE_TASKLET_BLOCKED, &gse->flags);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1028,6 +1034,7 @@ static void disable_submission(struct intel_guc *guc)
> > if (__tasklet_is_enabled(&sched_engine->tasklet)) {
> > GEM_BUG_ON(!guc->ct.enabled);
> > __tasklet_disable_sync_once(&sched_engine->tasklet);
> > + hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&guc->gse[i]->hang_timer);
> > sched_engine->tasklet.callback = NULL;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -3750,6 +3757,33 @@ static void guc_sched_engine_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> > kfree(gse);
> > }
> >
> > +static enum hrtimer_restart gse_hang(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
> > +{
> > + struct guc_submit_engine *gse =
> > + container_of(hrtimer, struct guc_submit_engine, hang_timer);
> > + struct intel_guc *guc = gse->sched_engine.private_data;
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
> > + if (guc->gse_hang_expected)
> > + drm_dbg(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > + "GSE[%i] hung, disabling submission", gse->id);
> > + else
> > + drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > + "GSE[%i] hung, disabling submission", gse->id);
> > +#else
> > + drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > + "GSE[%i] hung, disabling submission", gse->id);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Tasklet not making forward progress, disable submission which in turn
> > + * will kick in the heartbeat to do a full GPU reset.
> > + */
> > + disable_submission(guc);
> > +
> > + return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void guc_submit_engine_init(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > struct guc_submit_engine *gse,
> > int id)
> > @@ -3767,6 +3801,8 @@ static void guc_submit_engine_init(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > sched_engine->retire_inflight_request_prio =
> > guc_retire_inflight_request_prio;
> > sched_engine->private_data = guc;
> > + hrtimer_init(&gse->hang_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> > + gse->hang_timer.function = gse_hang;
> > gse->id = id;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h
> > index a5933e07bdd2..eae2e9725ede 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission_types.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> > #ifndef _INTEL_GUC_SUBMISSION_TYPES_H_
> > #define _INTEL_GUC_SUBMISSION_TYPES_H_
> >
> > +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> > +
> > #include "gt/intel_engine_types.h"
> > #include "gt/intel_context_types.h"
> > #include "i915_scheduler_types.h"
> > @@ -41,6 +43,7 @@ struct guc_submit_engine {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int total_num_rq_with_no_guc_id;
> > atomic_t num_guc_ids_not_ready;
> > + struct hrtimer hang_timer;
> > int id;
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-09 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 22:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/46] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/46] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/46] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/46] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-08-05 8:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/46] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-08-05 8:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/46] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/46] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/46] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/46] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/46] drm/i915: Add GT PM unpark worker Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/46] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:11 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 6:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10 21:29 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/46] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:20 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 6:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:47 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/46] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/46] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:28 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 6:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/46] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:37 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 6:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:55 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/46] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 14:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:45 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 18:44 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 8:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC parent-child context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 18:58 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 8:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 18:06 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-12 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 14:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 18:23 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/46] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/46] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/46] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:03 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 9:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/46] drm/i915/guc: Add hang check to GuC submit engine Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:05 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-08-10 9:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/46] drm/i915/guc: Add guc_child_context_destroy Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 15:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:06 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/46] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 16:39 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/46] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:13 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 9:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10 9:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-10 17:29 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-11 10:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:35 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/46] drm/i915: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/46] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/46] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/46] drm/i915/guc: Extend GuC flow control selftest for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/46] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption " Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/46] drm/i915: Move secure execbuf check to execbuf2 Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/46] drm/i915: Move input/exec fence handling to i915_gem_execbuffer2 Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/46] drm/i915: Move output " Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/46] drm/i915: Return output fence from i915_gem_do_execbuffer Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/46] drm/i915: Store batch index in struct i915_execbuffer Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/46] drm/i915: Allow callers of i915_gem_do_execbuffer to override the batch index Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/46] drm/i915: Teach execbuf there can be more than one batch in the objects list Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/46] drm/i915: Only track object dependencies on first request Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/46] drm/i915: Force parallel contexts to use copy engine for reloc Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 16:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/46] drm/i915: Multi-batch execbuffer2 Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/46] drm/i915: Eliminate unnecessary VMA calls for multi-BB submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 17:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/46] drm/i915: Hold all parallel requests until last request, properly handle error Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/46] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/46] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/46] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
2021-08-03 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/46] drm/i915/guc: Add delay before disabling scheduling on contexts Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 17:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:32 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-11 9:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-11 17:43 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-12 14:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-12 19:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-03 22:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev2) Patchwork
2021-08-03 22:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-08-03 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-08-03 23:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-05 3:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210809190558.GA123848@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox