From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Move intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable() to fdi code
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:16:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015071625.593-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015071625.593-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reanme intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable() to hsw_fdi_disable() and
relocate it next to all the other code dealing with FDI_RX.
intel_ddi.c has now been cleansed of FDI_RX.
In order to avoid exposing intel_disable_ddi_buf() outside
intel_ddi.c we can just open code the DDI_BUF_CTL write. The
enable side already has all that stuff open coded so
this actually is more symmetric. But we do need to remeber
to bring the intel_wait_ddi_buf_idle() call over from
inside intel_disable_ddi_buf().
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 37 +-----------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.c
index fe807c8e793d..db27ae2a8406 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.c
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static void hsw_post_disable_crt(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
lpt_disable_pch_transcoder(dev_priv);
lpt_disable_iclkip(dev_priv);
- intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(state, encoder, old_crtc_state, old_conn_state);
+ hsw_fdi_disable(encoder);
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !old_crtc_state->has_pch_encoder);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
index 8bbbeec01607..ab52eab346fe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ void intel_ddi_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
encoder->enable_clock(encoder, crtc_state);
}
-static void intel_ddi_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
+void intel_ddi_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
{
if (encoder->disable_clock)
encoder->disable_clock(encoder);
@@ -2867,41 +2867,6 @@ static void intel_ddi_post_disable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
intel_tc_port_put_link(dig_port);
}
-void intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder,
- const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
- const struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state)
-{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
- u32 val;
-
- /*
- * Bspec lists this as both step 13 (before DDI_BUF_CTL disable)
- * and step 18 (after clearing PORT_CLK_SEL). Based on a BUN,
- * step 13 is the correct place for it. Step 18 is where it was
- * originally before the BUN.
- */
- val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A));
- val &= ~FDI_RX_ENABLE;
- intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val);
-
- intel_disable_ddi_buf(encoder, old_crtc_state);
- intel_ddi_disable_clock(encoder);
-
- val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_MISC(PIPE_A));
- val &= ~(FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE1_MASK | FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE0_MASK);
- val |= FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE1_VAL(2) | FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE0_VAL(2);
- intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_MISC(PIPE_A), val);
-
- val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A));
- val &= ~FDI_PCDCLK;
- intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val);
-
- val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A));
- val &= ~FDI_RX_PLL_ENABLE;
- intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val);
-}
-
static void trans_port_sync_stop_link_train(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h
index d6971717ef9c..6f4551c9d5b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ void intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
const struct drm_connector_state *old_conn_state);
void intel_ddi_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+void intel_ddi_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
void intel_ddi_get_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct intel_shared_dpll *pll);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c
index d1c1600c66cb..2b5f80f3b4e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c
@@ -886,6 +886,43 @@ void hsw_fdi_link_train(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
DP_TP_CTL_ENABLE);
}
+void hsw_fdi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
+ u32 val;
+
+ /*
+ * Bspec lists this as both step 13 (before DDI_BUF_CTL disable)
+ * and step 18 (after clearing PORT_CLK_SEL). Based on a BUN,
+ * step 13 is the correct place for it. Step 18 is where it was
+ * originally before the BUN.
+ */
+ val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A));
+ val &= ~FDI_RX_ENABLE;
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val);
+
+ val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_E));
+ val &= ~DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE;
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_E), val);
+
+ intel_wait_ddi_buf_idle(dev_priv, PORT_E);
+
+ intel_ddi_disable_clock(encoder);
+
+ val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_MISC(PIPE_A));
+ val &= ~(FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE1_MASK | FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE0_MASK);
+ val |= FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE1_VAL(2) | FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE0_VAL(2);
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_MISC(PIPE_A), val);
+
+ val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A));
+ val &= ~FDI_PCDCLK;
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val);
+
+ val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A));
+ val &= ~FDI_RX_PLL_ENABLE;
+ intel_de_write(dev_priv, FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val);
+}
+
void ilk_fdi_pll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.h
index 5a361730f80a..1cdb86172702 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ void ilk_fdi_pll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_fdi_init_hook(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void hsw_fdi_link_train(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+void hsw_fdi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
void intel_fdi_pll_freq_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
void intel_fdi_link_train(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-15 7:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915: Move PCH modeset code into its own file Ville Syrjala
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Move PCH refclok stuff " Ville Syrjala
2021-10-17 23:56 ` David Airlie
2021-10-18 8:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-18 13:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Move PCH modeset code to " Ville Syrjala
2021-10-17 23:57 ` David Airlie
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Clean up the {ilk, lpt}_pch_enable() calling convention Ville Syrjala
2021-10-17 23:58 ` David Airlie
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Move LPT PCH readout code Ville Syrjala
2021-10-18 0:19 ` David Airlie
2021-10-18 7:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-18 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2021-10-18 19:46 ` David Airlie
2021-10-19 7:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Extract ilk_pch_get_config() Ville Syrjala
2021-10-18 0:22 ` David Airlie
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Move iCLKIP readout to the pch code Ville Syrjala
2021-10-18 0:43 ` David Airlie
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Introduce ilk_pch_disable() and ilk_pch_post_disable() Ville Syrjala
2021-10-18 0:43 ` David Airlie
2021-10-15 7:16 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2021-10-18 0:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Move intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable() to fdi code David Airlie
2021-10-15 7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Introduce lpt_pch_disable() Ville Syrjala
2021-10-15 12:11 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-15 12:56 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-15 14:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-18 0:44 ` David Airlie
2021-10-15 7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Move PCH modeset code into its own file Patchwork
2021-10-15 7:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-15 8:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-15 14:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-10-18 18:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Move PCH modeset code into its own file (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-18 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-18 19:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-19 1:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211015071625.593-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox