public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: Make i915_gem_evict_vm work correctly for already locked objects
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:47:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129134735.628712-11-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129134735.628712-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

i915_gem_execbuf will call i915_gem_evict_vm() after failing to pin
all objects in the first round. We are about to remove those short-term
pins, but even without those the objects are still locked. Add a special
case to allow i915_gem_evict_vm to evict locked objects as well.

This might also allow multiple objects sharing the same resv to be evicted.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
index 24f5e3345e43..f502a617b35c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
@@ -410,21 +410,42 @@ int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww)
 	do {
 		struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
 		LIST_HEAD(eviction_list);
+		LIST_HEAD(locked_eviction_list);
 
 		list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->bound_list, vm_link) {
 			if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma))
 				continue;
 
+			/*
+			 * If we already own the lock, trylock fails. In case the resv
+			 * is shared among multiple objects, we still need the object ref.
+			 */
+			if (ww && (dma_resv_locking_ctx(vma->obj->base.resv) == &ww->ctx)) {
+				__i915_vma_pin(vma);
+				list_add(&vma->evict_link, &locked_eviction_list);
+				continue;
+			}
+
 			if (!i915_gem_object_trylock(vma->obj, ww))
 				continue;
 
 			__i915_vma_pin(vma);
 			list_add(&vma->evict_link, &eviction_list);
 		}
-		if (list_empty(&eviction_list))
+		if (list_empty(&eviction_list) && list_empty(&locked_eviction_list))
 			break;
 
 		ret = 0;
+		/* Unbind locked objects first, before unlocking the eviction_list */
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &locked_eviction_list, evict_link) {
+			__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
+
+			if (ret == 0)
+				ret = __i915_vma_unbind(vma);
+			if (ret != -EINTR) /* "Get me out of here!" */
+				ret = 0;
+		}
+
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &eviction_list, evict_link) {
 			__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
 			if (ret == 0)
-- 
2.34.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-29 13:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: Remove unused bits of i915_vma/active api Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915: Change shrink ordering to use locking around unbinding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/i915: Remove pages_mutex and intel_gtt->vma_ops.set/clear_pages members, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:13   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-06 15:18     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 17:00       ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 18:15         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-12-06 17:10   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 10:06     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:45       ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/i915: Take object lock in i915_ggtt_pin if ww is not set Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:18   ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30  9:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 15:07     ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/i915: Ensure gem_contexts selftests work with unbind changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:44   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:20     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: Take trylock during eviction, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 11:01   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:28     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915: Pass trylock context to callers Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 14:26   ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 11:49   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 12:01     ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-12-08 12:07   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: Make i915_gem_evict_vm work correctly for already locked objects Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:34     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 12:17   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 12:59     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/i915: Add i915_vma_unbind_unlocked, and take obj lock for i915_vma_unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:05   ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:25     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:40       ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:45         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 14:27           ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915: Require object lock when freeing pages during destruction Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915: Remove assert_object_held_shared Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:07   ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/i915: Remove support for unlocked i915_vma unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915: Remove short-term pins from execbuf, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 16:22   ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-11-30  8:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:17   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30 18:38     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-01 11:15       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 13:11         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf. (rev2) Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-11-30 14:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211129134735.628712-11-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox