From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915: Remove assert_object_held_shared
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:47:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129134735.628712-15-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129134735.628712-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This duck tape workaround is no longer required, unbind and destroy are
fixed to take the obj->resv mutex before destroying and obj->mm.lock has
been removed, always requiring obj->resv as well.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 14 --------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 12 ++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 6 +++---
5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
index 39cd563544a5..0ae86812ed66 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ bool i915_gem_object_has_struct_page(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
if (IS_DGFX(to_i915(obj->base.dev)) &&
i915_gem_object_evictable((void __force *)obj))
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
#endif
return obj->mem_flags & I915_BO_FLAG_STRUCT_PAGE;
}
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ bool i915_gem_object_has_iomem(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
if (IS_DGFX(to_i915(obj->base.dev)) &&
i915_gem_object_evictable((void __force *)obj))
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
#endif
return obj->mem_flags & I915_BO_FLAG_IOMEM;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index f66d46882ea7..09cf1c92373a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -157,20 +157,6 @@ i915_gem_object_put(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
#define assert_object_held(obj) dma_resv_assert_held((obj)->base.resv)
-/*
- * If more than one potential simultaneous locker, assert held.
- */
-static inline void assert_object_held_shared(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
-{
- /*
- * Note mm list lookup is protected by
- * kref_get_unless_zero().
- */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) &&
- kref_read(&obj->base.refcount) > 0)
- assert_object_held(obj);
-}
-
static inline int __i915_gem_object_lock(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
bool intr)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index 49c6e55c68ce..6805b46170be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ void __i915_gem_object_set_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
bool shrinkable;
int i;
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
if (i915_gem_object_is_volatile(obj))
obj->mm.madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
int err;
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
if (unlikely(obj->mm.madv != I915_MADV_WILLNEED)) {
drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int __i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
assert_object_held(obj);
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
if (unlikely(!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj))) {
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ int i915_gem_object_truncate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
/* Try to discard unwanted pages */
void i915_gem_object_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj));
if (obj->ops->writeback)
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ __i915_gem_object_unset_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
struct sg_table *pages;
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
pages = fetch_and_zero(&obj->mm.pages);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ int __i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
return -EBUSY;
/* May be called by shrinker from within get_pages() (on another bo) */
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
i915_gem_object_release_mmap_offset(obj);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
index 3173c9f9a040..a315c010f635 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void i915_gem_object_userptr_drop_ref(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
struct page **pvec = NULL;
- assert_object_held_shared(obj);
+ assert_object_held(obj);
if (!--obj->userptr.page_ref) {
pvec = obj->userptr.pvec;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
index 7261d82162af..100739b3e084 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ int _i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
void __i915_vma_evict(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_pinned(vma));
- assert_object_held_shared(vma->obj);
+ assert_object_held(vma->obj);
if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma)) {
/* Force a pagefault for domain tracking on next user access */
@@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ int __i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&vma->vm->mutex);
- assert_object_held_shared(vma->obj);
+ assert_object_held(vma->obj);
if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
return 0;
@@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
intel_wakeref_t wakeref = 0;
int err;
- assert_object_held_shared(vma->obj);
+ assert_object_held(vma->obj);
/* Optimistic wait before taking the mutex */
err = i915_vma_sync(vma);
--
2.34.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-29 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 13:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: Remove unused bits of i915_vma/active api Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915: Change shrink ordering to use locking around unbinding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/i915: Remove pages_mutex and intel_gtt->vma_ops.set/clear_pages members, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:13 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-06 15:18 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 17:00 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-12-06 17:10 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 10:06 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:45 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/i915: Take object lock in i915_ggtt_pin if ww is not set Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:18 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30 9:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 15:07 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/i915: Ensure gem_contexts selftests work with unbind changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:20 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: Take trylock during eviction, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 11:01 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:28 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915: Pass trylock context to callers Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 14:26 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 11:49 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 12:01 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: Make i915_gem_evict_vm work correctly for already locked objects Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 12:07 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 12:17 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 12:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/i915: Add i915_vma_unbind_unlocked, and take obj lock for i915_vma_unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:05 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:40 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:45 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 14:27 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915: Require object lock when freeing pages during destruction Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-12-09 13:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915: Remove assert_object_held_shared Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/i915: Remove support for unlocked i915_vma unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915: Remove short-term pins from execbuf, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 16:22 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-11-30 8:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:17 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30 18:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-01 11:15 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 13:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf. (rev2) Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-11-30 14:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211129134735.628712-15-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox