From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:47:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129134735.628712-6-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129134735.628712-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
We will need the lock to unbind the vma, and wait for bind to complete.
Remove the special casing for the !ww path, and force ww locking for all.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 7 ++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 1bfadd9127fc..8322abe194da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1842,13 +1842,10 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags);
-static inline struct i915_vma * __must_check
+struct i915_vma * __must_check
i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
- u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags)
-{
- return i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(obj, NULL, view, size, alignment, flags);
-}
+ u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags);
int i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
unsigned long flags);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 527228d4da7e..e83522953cde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -877,6 +877,8 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct i915_vma *vma;
int ret;
+ GEM_WARN_ON(!ww);
+
if (flags & PIN_MAPPABLE &&
(!view || view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL)) {
/*
@@ -936,10 +938,7 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
- if (ww)
- ret = i915_vma_pin_ww(vma, ww, size, alignment, flags | PIN_GLOBAL);
- else
- ret = i915_vma_pin(vma, size, alignment, flags | PIN_GLOBAL);
+ ret = i915_vma_pin_ww(vma, ww, size, alignment, flags | PIN_GLOBAL);
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -959,6 +958,25 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
return vma;
}
+struct i915_vma * __must_check
+i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
+ u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags)
+{
+ struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
+ struct i915_vma *ret;
+ int err;
+
+ for_i915_gem_ww(&ww, err, true) {
+ err = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, &ww);
+ if (!err)
+ ret = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(obj, &ww, view, size,
+ alignment, flags);
+ }
+
+ return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : ret;
+}
+
int
i915_gem_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv)
--
2.34.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-29 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 13:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: Remove unused bits of i915_vma/active api Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915: Change shrink ordering to use locking around unbinding Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/i915: Remove pages_mutex and intel_gtt->vma_ops.set/clear_pages members, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:13 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-06 15:18 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 17:00 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-12-06 17:10 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-07 10:06 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:45 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/i915: Take object lock in i915_ggtt_pin if ww is not set Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-06 13:18 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-11-30 9:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Force ww lock for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 15:07 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/i915: Ensure gem_contexts selftests work with unbind changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 10:44 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:20 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: Take trylock during eviction, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 11:01 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:28 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915: Pass trylock context to callers Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-07 14:26 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Ensure i915_vma tests do not get -ENOSPC with the locking changes Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 11:49 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 12:01 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: Make i915_gem_evict_vm work correctly for already locked objects Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-08 12:07 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915: Call i915_gem_evict_vm in vm_fault_gtt to prevent new ENOSPC errors Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 12:17 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 12:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/i915: Add i915_vma_unbind_unlocked, and take obj lock for i915_vma_unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:05 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:40 ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-09 13:45 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 14:27 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915: Require object lock when freeing pages during destruction Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915: Remove assert_object_held_shared Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 13:07 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/i915: Remove support for unlocked i915_vma unbind Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-29 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915: Remove short-term pins from execbuf, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-09 16:22 ` Matthew Auld
2021-11-29 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-29 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-11-30 8:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:17 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-11-30 18:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-01 11:15 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2021-12-01 13:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-11-30 11:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove short term pins from execbuf. (rev2) Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-11-30 11:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-11-30 14:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211129134735.628712-6-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox