From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915: Pimp icl+ sagv pre/post update
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 19:42:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220216174250.4449-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220216174250.4449-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Add some debugs on what exactly we're doing to the QGV point mask
in the icl+ sagv pre/post plane update hooks. Currently we're just
guessing.
v2: s/u32/u16/ for consistency with the mask sizes (Stan)
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 9e2c339f8d16..f4324c0326cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3814,26 +3814,22 @@ static void icl_sagv_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
- u32 new_mask;
+ u16 old_mask, new_mask;
if (!new_bw_state)
return;
- /*
- * Nothing to mask
- */
- if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask == old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask)
- return;
-
+ old_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
new_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask | new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
- /*
- * If new mask is zero - means there is nothing to mask,
- * we can only unmask, which should be done in unmask.
- */
- if (!new_mask)
+ if (old_mask == new_mask)
return;
+ WARN_ON(!new_bw_state->base.changed);
+
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Restricting QGV points: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
+ old_mask, new_mask);
+
/*
* Restrict required qgv points before updating the configuration.
* According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
@@ -3850,19 +3846,22 @@ static void icl_sagv_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
intel_atomic_get_old_bw_state(state);
const struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state =
intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
- u32 new_mask = 0;
+ u16 old_mask, new_mask;
if (!new_bw_state)
return;
- /*
- * Nothing to unmask
- */
- if (new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask == old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask)
- return;
-
+ old_mask = old_bw_state->qgv_points_mask | new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
new_mask = new_bw_state->qgv_points_mask;
+ if (old_mask == new_mask)
+ return;
+
+ WARN_ON(!new_bw_state->base.changed);
+
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Relaxing QGV points: 0x%x -> 0x%x\n",
+ old_mask, new_mask);
+
/*
* Allow required qgv points after updating the configuration.
* According to BSpec we can't mask and unmask qgv points at the same
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-16 17:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915: SAGV fixes Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915: Correctly populate use_sagv_wm for all pipes Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: Fix bw atomic check when switching between SAGV vs. no SAGV Ville Syrjala
2022-02-17 18:29 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-16 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915: Split pre-icl vs. icl+ SAGV hooks apart Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 17:42 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2022-02-16 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915: Extract icl_qgv_points_mask() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915: Extract intel_bw_check_data_rate() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-17 18:33 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-02-17 11:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: SAGV fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2022-02-17 20:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-18 4:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220216174250.4449-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox