From: "Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src()
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:35:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220216193538.GD27285@labuser-Z97X-UD5H> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215183208.6143-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 08:32:02PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> intel_crtc_compute_config() doesn't really tell a unified story.
> Let's chunk it up into pieces. We'll start with
> intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
with just one clarification below
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 62 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 19417ff975c6..3d3fddd3f452 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2798,18 +2798,55 @@ static void intel_encoder_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> intel_crtc_readout_derived_state(crtc_state);
> }
>
> +static int intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +
> + if (crtc_state->bigjoiner)
> + crtc_state->pipe_src_w /= 2;
> +
> + /*
> + * Pipe horizontal size must be even in:
> + * - DVO ganged mode
> + * - LVDS dual channel mode
> + * - Double wide pipe
> + */
> + if (crtc_state->pipe_src_w & 1) {
> + if (crtc_state->double_wide) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> + "[CRTC:%d:%s] Odd pipe source width not supported with double wide pipe\n",
> + crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS) &&
> + intel_is_dual_link_lvds(i915)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> + "[CRTC:%d:%s] Odd pipe source width not supported with dual link LVDS\n",
> + crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> struct drm_display_mode *pipe_mode = &crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode;
> int clock_limit = i915->max_dotclk_freq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src(crtc_state);
Here crtc_state->pipe_src_w would already have been populated right?
Just wanted to double check since we are moving this earlier in the function
Manasi
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> drm_mode_copy(pipe_mode, &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode);
>
> intel_bigjoiner_adjust_timings(crtc_state, pipe_mode);
> - if (crtc_state->bigjoiner)
> - crtc_state->pipe_src_w /= 2;
>
> intel_splitter_adjust_timings(crtc_state, pipe_mode);
>
> @@ -2837,27 +2874,6 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Pipe horizontal size must be even in:
> - * - DVO ganged mode
> - * - LVDS dual channel mode
> - * - Double wide pipe
> - */
> - if (crtc_state->pipe_src_w & 1) {
> - if (crtc_state->double_wide) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> - "Odd pipe source width not supported with double wide pipe\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS) &&
> - intel_is_dual_link_lvds(i915)) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> - "Odd pipe source width not supported with dual link LVDS\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - }
> -
> intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate(crtc_state);
>
> if (crtc_state->has_pch_encoder)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 18:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: Move bigjoiner refactoring Ville Syrjala
2022-02-15 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Fix cursor coordinates on bigjoiner slave Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 3:25 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-16 8:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 19:23 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Remove nop bigjoiner state copy Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 12:52 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-15 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Rename variables in intel_crtc_compute_config() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:26 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_splitter_adjust_timings() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-17 8:26 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_bigjoiner_adjust_timings() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:32 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:35 ` Navare, Manasi [this message]
2022-02-16 19:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_compute_pipe_mode() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:37 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: Fix MSO vs. bigjoiner timings confusion Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:50 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: Start tracking PIPESRC as a drm_rect Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 11:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Eliminate bigjoiner boolean Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 10:57 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-16 11:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 11:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-16 21:25 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Use bigjoiner_pipes more Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 12:27 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-16 12:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 21:26 ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: Make the PIPESC rect relative to the entire bigjoiner area Ville Syrjala
2022-02-17 1:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Move bigjoiner refactoring Patchwork
2022-02-17 10:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-17 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] " Nautiyal, Ankit K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220216193538.GD27285@labuser-Z97X-UD5H \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox