Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Fix cursor coordinates on bigjoiner slave
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:39:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ygy4XMoDhvXiDftb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220216032530.GA24306@labuser-Z97X-UD5H>

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 07:25:36PM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 08:31:57PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Adjust the cursor dst coordinates appripriately when it's on
> > the bigjoiner slave pipe. intel_atomic_plane_check_clipping()
> > already did this but with the cursor we discard those results
> > (apart from uapi.visible and error checks) since the hardware
> > will be doing the clipping for us.
> > 
> > v2: Rebase due to bigjoiner bitmask usage
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > index 2ade8fdd9bdd..3e80763aa828 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c
> > @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ static int intel_check_cursor(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >  	/* Use the unclipped src/dst rectangles, which we program to hw */
> >  	plane_state->uapi.src = src;
> >  	plane_state->uapi.dst = dst;
> > +	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> > +		drm_rect_translate(&plane_state->uapi.dst,
> > +				   -crtc_state->pipe_src_w, 0);
> 
> So this is basically to offset the cursor position from say 3860 to 0, 3861 to 1 ....7680 to 3860 for the right half
> of the screen right?
> And without this, it will just keep it at first rectangle?

Yes. The original rectangle came from userspace and is thus
relative to the whole area covered by all the joined pipes.
But the plane coordinates we hand to the hardware must be
relative to their respective pipe.

It's a bit ugly as is but works for now. The last patch make
this much nicer by removing all the assumptions here about
the relative positions of the pipes.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-15 18:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: Move bigjoiner refactoring Ville Syrjala
2022-02-15 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Fix cursor coordinates on bigjoiner slave Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  3:25   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-16  8:39     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-02-16 19:23       ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Remove nop bigjoiner state copy Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 12:52   ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-15 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Rename variables in intel_crtc_compute_config() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:26   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_splitter_adjust_timings() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-17  8:26   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_bigjoiner_adjust_timings() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:32   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:35   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-16 19:44     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_compute_pipe_mode() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:37   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: Fix MSO vs. bigjoiner timings confusion Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 19:50   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: Start tracking PIPESRC as a drm_rect Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 11:38   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Eliminate bigjoiner boolean Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 10:57   ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-16 11:04     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 11:23       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-16 21:25   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Use bigjoiner_pipes more Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 12:27   ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-02-16 12:35   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 21:26   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-02-15 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: Make the PIPESC rect relative to the entire bigjoiner area Ville Syrjala
2022-02-17  1:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Move bigjoiner refactoring Patchwork
2022-02-17 10:29   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-17 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] " Nautiyal, Ankit K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ygy4XMoDhvXiDftb@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox