Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915: Round up when calculating display bandwidth requirements
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:46:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310074604.GA20808@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303191207.27931-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:12:04PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> We should round up when doing bandwidth calculations to make sure
> our estimates don't fall short of the actual number.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index df98b1d7a6f7..0759bb95ea4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static unsigned int intel_bw_data_rate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		data_rate += bw_state->data_rate[pipe];
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13 && intel_vtd_active(dev_priv))
> -		data_rate = data_rate * 105 / 100;
> +		data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_rate * 105, 100);
>  
>  	return data_rate;
>  }
> @@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ int intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = max_bw / 64;
> +	new_bw_state->min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_bw, 64);
>  
>  	if (new_bw_state->min_cdclk != old_bw_state->min_cdclk) {
>  		int ret = intel_atomic_lock_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-03 19:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] drm/i915: Fix bandwith related cdclk calculations Ville Syrjala
2022-03-03 19:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915: Tweak plane ddb allocation tracking Ville Syrjala
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915: Split plane data_rate into data_rate+data_rate_y Ville Syrjala
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915: Pre-calculate plane relative data rate Ville Syrjala
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915: Remove total[] and uv_total[] from ddb allocation Ville Syrjala
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915: Nuke intel_bw_calc_min_cdclk() Ville Syrjala
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915: Round up when calculating display bandwidth requirements Ville Syrjala
2022-03-10  7:46   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915: Properly write lock bw_state when it changes Ville Syrjala
2022-03-10  7:47   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915: Fix DBUF bandwidth vs. cdclk handling Ville Syrjala
2022-03-10  8:22   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-10  8:59     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-10 12:37       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-03 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915: Add "maximum pipe read bandwidth" checks Ville Syrjala
2022-03-10 14:06   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-03 20:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix bandwith related cdclk calculations (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-03 20:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-03 20:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-04  9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220310074604.GA20808@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox