From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/dsc/mtl: Add support for fractional bpp
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 15:49:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221128101922.217217-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221128101922.217217-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
From: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Consider the fractional bpp while reading the qp values.
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c | 3 ---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c
index 6f8e4ec5c0fb..a0094287dc81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c
@@ -21,9 +21,6 @@
* These qp tables are as per the C model
* and it has the rows pointing to bpps which increment
* in steps of 0.5
- * We do not support fractional bpps as of today,
- * hence we would skip the fractional bpps during
- * our references for qp calclulations.
*/
static const u8 rc_range_minqp444_8bpc[DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES][RC_RANGE_QP444_8BPC_MAX_NUM_BPP] = {
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
index 73f9ea266533..d24ca8828a1d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ calculate_rc_params(struct rc_parameters *rc,
{
int bpc = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_component;
int bpp = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel >> 4;
+ int fractional_bits = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel & 0xf;
static const s8 ofs_und6[] = {
0, -2, -2, -4, -6, -6, -8, -8, -8, -10, -10, -12, -12, -12, -12
};
@@ -421,7 +422,13 @@ calculate_rc_params(struct rc_parameters *rc,
rc->rc_quant_incr_limit0 = 11 + qp_bpc_modifier;
rc->rc_quant_incr_limit1 = 11 + qp_bpc_modifier;
- bpp_i = (2 * (bpp - 6));
+ /*
+ * QP table rows have values in increment of 0.5.
+ * So 6.0 bpp to 6.4375 will have index 0, 6.5 to 6.9375 will have index 1,
+ * and so on.
+ * 0.5 represented as 0x8 in U6.4 format.
+ */
+ bpp_i = ((bpp - 6) + (fractional_bits < 0x8 ? 0 : 1));
for (buf_i = 0; buf_i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; buf_i++) {
/* Read range_minqp and range_max_qp from qp tables */
rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_min_qp =
@@ -469,8 +476,7 @@ int intel_dsc_compute_params(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
/* Gen 11 does not support VBR */
vdsc_cfg->vbr_enable = false;
- /* Gen 11 only supports integral values of bpp */
- vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel = compressed_bpp << 4;
+ vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel = pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp;
vdsc_cfg->bits_per_component = pipe_config->pipe_bpp / 3;
for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES - 1; i++) {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-28 10:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] Add DSC fractional bpp support Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/dp: Check if force dsc bpc <= max requested bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/display/dp: Add helper function to get DSC bpp prescision Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 15:27 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/dp: Rename helpers to get DSC max pipe bpp and max output bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/dp: Get optimal link config to have best compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2022-12-05 7:28 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-12-06 10:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/display: Store compressed bpp in U6.4 format Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/display: Consider fractional vdsc bpp while computing m_n values Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/audio : Consider fractional vdsc bpp while computing tu_data Ankit Nautiyal
2022-12-05 7:35 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-12-06 10:19 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-11-28 10:19 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/dp: Iterate over output bpp with fractional step size Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/dsc: Add debugfs entry to validate DSC fractional bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/dsc: Allow DSC only with fractional bpp when forced from debugfs Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 12:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DSC fractional bpp support Patchwork
2022-11-28 12:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-11-28 13:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-28 16:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221128101922.217217-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox