Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
@ 2023-06-28 14:10 Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy @ 2023-06-28 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 	saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
 	saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
 	saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
-	saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
 	saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
 
 	intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
-- 
2.37.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
  2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
@ 2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
  2023-06-29 11:32   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  2023-06-28 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2023-06-28 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx

On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
> If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
> same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.

Could this help with [1]?

BR,
Jani.

[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8720

>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
>  	saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
>  	saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> -	saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
>  	saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
>  
>  	intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
  2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2023-06-28 16:54 ` Patchwork
  2023-06-29 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2) Patchwork
  2023-06-30 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Ville Syrjälä
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-06-28 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7539 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119978/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13330 -> Patchwork_119978v1
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_119978v1 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_119978v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/index.html

Participating hosts (40 -> 39)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka 
  Missing    (2): bat-rpls-2 fi-snb-2520m 

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_119978v1:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915:
    - bat-rpls-1:         [PASS][1] -> [WARN][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html

  * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_119978v1 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs:
    - bat-mtlp-8:         [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#7059])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][8] ([i915#1886] / [i915#7913])
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@mman:
    - bat-rpls-1:         [PASS][9] -> [TIMEOUT][10] ([i915#6794] / [i915#7392])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@mman.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@mman.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
    - bat-mtlp-8:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#6645])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium_frames@hdmi-crc-fast:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([fdo#109271]) +14 similar issues
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_chamelium_frames@hdmi-crc-fast.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend:
    - bat-dg2-11:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#7828])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-dg2-11/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
    - bat-mtlp-8:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([i915#7828])
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence:
    - bat-adlp-9:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([i915#3546]) +2 similar issues
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-adlp-9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4579])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
    - bat-dg2-11:         [ABORT][17] ([i915#7913] / [i915#7979]) -> [PASS][18]
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-dg2-11/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-dg2-11/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
    - bat-mtlp-8:         [ABORT][19] ([i915#7982]) -> [PASS][20]
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move:
    - bat-rplp-1:         [SKIP][21] ([i915#1072]) -> [ABORT][22] ([i915#8434])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
  [i915#1886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1886
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#3546]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3546
  [i915#4579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4579
  [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
  [i915#6645]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6645
  [i915#6794]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6794
  [i915#7059]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7059
  [i915#7392]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7392
  [i915#7828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7828
  [i915#7913]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913
  [i915#7979]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7979
  [i915#7982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7982
  [i915#8434]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8434


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_13330 -> Patchwork_119978v1

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_13330: dd3ec2080383e2bf738c6640aca4183997cf2dde @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_7353: cacdae5ad7cb92bdc26a79802fcdd244dadccd42 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_119978v1: dd3ec2080383e2bf738c6640aca4183997cf2dde @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


### Linux commits

49eb7f9e9814 drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8898 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
  2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2023-06-29 11:32   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  2023-06-29 12:22     ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav @ 2023-06-29 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:10:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
> > If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
> > same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
> 
> Could this help with [1]?
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8720

I don't think that would help, here this is mostly a cosmetic fix
to remove dmesg warn caused by slave crtc sw/hw state mismatch, because
we don't calculate pll state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner, but still try
to verify it against the values in the correspodent hw.

Stan

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  	saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
> >  	saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
> >  	saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> > -	saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
> >  	saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
> >  
> >  	intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
  2023-06-29 11:32   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
@ 2023-06-29 12:22     ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2023-06-29 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:10:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
>> > If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
>> > same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
>> 
>> Could this help with [1]?
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>> 
>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8720
>
> I don't think that would help, here this is mostly a cosmetic fix
> to remove dmesg warn caused by slave crtc sw/hw state mismatch, because
> we don't calculate pll state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner, but still try
> to verify it against the values in the correspodent hw.

I think that's one part of what's going in the bug, but I guess just for
a different phy.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Stan
>
>> 
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
>> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> >  	saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
>> >  	saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
>> >  	saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
>> > -	saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
>> >  	saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
>> >  
>> >  	intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2)
  2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
  2023-06-28 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2023-06-29 17:13 ` Patchwork
  2023-06-30 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Ville Syrjälä
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-06-29 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7803 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119978/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13336 -> Patchwork_119978v2
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_119978v2 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_119978v2, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/index.html

Participating hosts (41 -> 41)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka 
  Missing    (1): fi-snb-2520m 

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_119978v2:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@vgem_basic@unload:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@vgem_basic@unload.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_119978v2 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][4] ([i915#5334] / [i915#7872])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#1886] / [i915#7913])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend:
    - bat-jsl-1:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#7828])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-jsl-1/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
    - fi-bsw-n3050:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109271]) +14 similar issues
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip:
    - bat-rplp-1:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([i915#1072]) +3 similar issues
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
    - bat-rplp-1:         NOTRUN -> [ABORT][10] ([i915#4579] / [i915#8260] / [i915#8668])
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4579])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
    - fi-bsw-n3050:       [ABORT][12] ([i915#7911] / [i915#7913]) -> [PASS][13]
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat:
    - bat-jsl-3:          [DMESG-FAIL][14] ([i915#5334]) -> [PASS][15]
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-jsl-3/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-jsl-3/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
    - bat-rpls-2:         [DMESG-FAIL][16] ([i915#4258] / [i915#7913]) -> [PASS][17]
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate:
    - bat-jsl-1:          [INCOMPLETE][18] -> [PASS][19]
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-jsl-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-jsl-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
    - bat-mtlp-6:         [DMESG-FAIL][20] ([i915#6763]) -> [PASS][21]
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-edp-1:
    - bat-rplp-1:         [ABORT][22] ([i915#8442] / [i915#8668]) -> [PASS][23]
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-edp-1.html
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-edp-1.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
  [i915#1886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1886
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#4258]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4258
  [i915#4579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4579
  [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
  [i915#5334]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5334
  [i915#6763]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6763
  [i915#7828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7828
  [i915#7872]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7872
  [i915#7911]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7911
  [i915#7913]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913
  [i915#8260]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8260
  [i915#8442]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8442
  [i915#8668]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8668


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_13336 -> Patchwork_119978v2

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_13336: 1423126050a5bb0317e86e61395e4413e0ad013b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_7356: 66452bb0118e8d3a78d054cef50a60a9858a00a9 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_119978v2: 1423126050a5bb0317e86e61395e4413e0ad013b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


### Linux commits

10a4db22eaec drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9438 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
  2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-06-29 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2023-06-30 17:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2023-06-30 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
> same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.

Yeah, and the master has recalculated this already. I guess this
used to make some sense in the times when we did the dpll
calculations much later.

So probably deserves a
Fixes: 0ff0e219d9b8 ("drm/i915: Compute clocks earlier")

Anyways,
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
>  	saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
>  	saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> -	saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;

Seems like we should also remove it from the
intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state() but that one clearly needs
much more thought due to the port_dpll[] stuff...

>  	saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
>  
>  	intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
> -- 
> 2.37.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-30 17:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-29 11:32   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-06-29 12:22     ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-28 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-06-29 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2) Patchwork
2023-06-30 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Ville Syrjälä

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox