* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
@ 2023-06-28 14:10 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy @ 2023-06-28 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
- saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
--
2.37.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
@ 2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-29 11:32 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-06-28 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2023-06-28 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy, intel-gfx
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
> If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
> same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
Could this help with [1]?
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8720
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
> saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
> saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> - saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
> saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
>
> intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2023-06-28 16:54 ` Patchwork
2023-06-29 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2) Patchwork
2023-06-30 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Ville Syrjälä
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-06-28 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7539 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119978/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13330 -> Patchwork_119978v1
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_119978v1 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_119978v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/index.html
Participating hosts (40 -> 39)
------------------------------
Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka
Missing (2): bat-rpls-2 fi-snb-2520m
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_119978v1:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915:
- bat-rpls-1: [PASS][1] -> [WARN][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html
* igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_119978v1 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs:
- bat-mtlp-8: [PASS][6] -> [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#7059])
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][8] ([i915#1886] / [i915#7913])
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@mman:
- bat-rpls-1: [PASS][9] -> [TIMEOUT][10] ([i915#6794] / [i915#7392])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@mman.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@mman.html
* igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
- bat-mtlp-8: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#6645])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html
* igt@kms_chamelium_frames@hdmi-crc-fast:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([fdo#109271]) +14 similar issues
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_chamelium_frames@hdmi-crc-fast.html
* igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend:
- bat-dg2-11: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([i915#7828])
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-dg2-11/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
- bat-mtlp-8: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([i915#7828])
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence:
- bat-adlp-9: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([i915#3546]) +2 similar issues
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-adlp-9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-frame-sequence.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4579])
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- bat-dg2-11: [ABORT][17] ([i915#7913] / [i915#7979]) -> [PASS][18]
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-dg2-11/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-dg2-11/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
- bat-mtlp-8: [ABORT][19] ([i915#7982]) -> [PASS][20]
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
#### Warnings ####
* igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move:
- bat-rplp-1: [SKIP][21] ([i915#1072]) -> [ABORT][22] ([i915#8434])
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13330/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
[i915#1886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1886
[i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
[i915#3546]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3546
[i915#4579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4579
[i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
[i915#6645]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6645
[i915#6794]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6794
[i915#7059]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7059
[i915#7392]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7392
[i915#7828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7828
[i915#7913]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913
[i915#7979]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7979
[i915#7982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7982
[i915#8434]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8434
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_13330 -> Patchwork_119978v1
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_13330: dd3ec2080383e2bf738c6640aca4183997cf2dde @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_7353: cacdae5ad7cb92bdc26a79802fcdd244dadccd42 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
Patchwork_119978v1: dd3ec2080383e2bf738c6640aca4183997cf2dde @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
### Linux commits
49eb7f9e9814 drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v1/index.html
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8898 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2023-06-29 11:32 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-06-29 12:22 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav @ 2023-06-29 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:10:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
> > If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
> > same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
>
> Could this help with [1]?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8720
I don't think that would help, here this is mostly a cosmetic fix
to remove dmesg warn caused by slave crtc sw/hw state mismatch, because
we don't calculate pll state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner, but still try
to verify it against the values in the correspodent hw.
Stan
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
> > saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
> > saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> > - saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
> > saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
> >
> > intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
2023-06-29 11:32 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
@ 2023-06-29 12:22 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2023-06-29 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:10:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> wrote:
>> > If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
>> > same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
>>
>> Could this help with [1]?
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8720
>
> I don't think that would help, here this is mostly a cosmetic fix
> to remove dmesg warn caused by slave crtc sw/hw state mismatch, because
> we don't calculate pll state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner, but still try
> to verify it against the values in the correspodent hw.
I think that's one part of what's going in the bug, but I guess just for
a different phy.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Stan
>
>>
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
>> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> > saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
>> > saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
>> > saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
>> > - saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
>> > saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
>> >
>> > intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2)
2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-28 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2023-06-29 17:13 ` Patchwork
2023-06-30 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Ville Syrjälä
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-06-29 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7803 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119978/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13336 -> Patchwork_119978v2
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_119978v2 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_119978v2, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/index.html
Participating hosts (41 -> 41)
------------------------------
Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka
Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_119978v2:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@vgem_basic@unload:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@vgem_basic@unload.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_119978v2 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][4] ([i915#5334] / [i915#7872])
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#1886] / [i915#7913])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
* igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend:
- bat-jsl-1: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#7828])
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-jsl-1/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
- fi-bsw-n3050: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@kms_chamelium_hpd@common-hpd-after-suspend.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109271]) +14 similar issues
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html
* igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip:
- bat-rplp-1: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([i915#1072]) +3 similar issues
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
- bat-rplp-1: NOTRUN -> [ABORT][10] ([i915#4579] / [i915#8260] / [i915#8668])
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4579])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-bsw-n3050: [ABORT][12] ([i915#7911] / [i915#7913]) -> [PASS][13]
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat:
- bat-jsl-3: [DMESG-FAIL][14] ([i915#5334]) -> [PASS][15]
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-jsl-3/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-jsl-3/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
- bat-rpls-2: [DMESG-FAIL][16] ([i915#4258] / [i915#7913]) -> [PASS][17]
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate:
- bat-jsl-1: [INCOMPLETE][18] -> [PASS][19]
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-jsl-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-jsl-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
- bat-mtlp-6: [DMESG-FAIL][20] ([i915#6763]) -> [PASS][21]
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-edp-1:
- bat-rplp-1: [ABORT][22] ([i915#8442] / [i915#8668]) -> [PASS][23]
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13336/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-edp-1.html
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-frame-sequence@pipe-d-edp-1.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
[i915#1886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1886
[i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
[i915#4258]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4258
[i915#4579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4579
[i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
[i915#5334]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5334
[i915#6763]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6763
[i915#7828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7828
[i915#7872]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7872
[i915#7911]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7911
[i915#7913]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7913
[i915#8260]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8260
[i915#8442]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8442
[i915#8668]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8668
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_13336 -> Patchwork_119978v2
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_13336: 1423126050a5bb0317e86e61395e4413e0ad013b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_7356: 66452bb0118e8d3a78d054cef50a60a9858a00a9 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
Patchwork_119978v2: 1423126050a5bb0317e86e61395e4413e0ad013b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
### Linux commits
10a4db22eaec drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_119978v2/index.html
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9438 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner
2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-29 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2023-06-30 17:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2023-06-30 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 05:10:17PM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> If we are using Bigjoiner dpll_hw_state is supposed to be exactly
> same as for master crtc, so no need to save it's state for slave crtc.
Yeah, and the master has recalculated this already. I guess this
used to make some sense in the times when we did the dpll
calculations much later.
So probably deserves a
Fixes: 0ff0e219d9b8 ("drm/i915: Compute clocks earlier")
Anyways,
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 43d6ba980780..c3e93bdde29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -4568,7 +4568,6 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi;
> saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state;
> saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> - saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
Seems like we should also remove it from the
intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state() but that one clearly needs
much more thought due to the port_dpll[] stuff...
> saved_state->crc_enabled = slave_crtc_state->crc_enabled;
>
> intel_crtc_free_hw_state(slave_crtc_state);
> --
> 2.37.3
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-30 17:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-28 14:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-06-28 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-29 11:32 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-06-29 12:22 ` Jani Nikula
2023-06-28 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-06-29 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner (rev2) Patchwork
2023-06-30 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't preserve dpll_hw_state for slave crtc in Bigjoiner Ville Syrjälä
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox