Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display
Date: Fri,  6 Dec 2024 19:59:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241206185956.3290-6-dev@lankhorst.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206185956.3290-1-dev@lankhorst.se>

Instead of 3 different calls, it should be safe to unify to a single
call now. This makes the init sequence cleaner, and display less
tangled.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 71 +++++++------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h |  8 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c          | 10 +---
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index d2e77417e2a02..ed00ab0f02422 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -101,19 +101,25 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
 	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
 }
 
-static void xe_display_fini_nommio(struct drm_device *dev, void *dummy)
+static void xe_display_fini_early(void *arg)
 {
-	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
+	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
 	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
 
 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
 		return;
 
+	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
+	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
+	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
 	intel_power_domains_cleanup(display);
 }
 
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
 {
+	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
+	int err;
+
 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -123,29 +129,6 @@ int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
 	/* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
 	intel_detect_pch(xe);
 
-	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_display_fini_nommio, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
-{
-	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
-	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
-
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return;
-
-	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
-	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
-	int err;
-
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return 0;
-
 	intel_display_driver_early_probe(xe);
 
 	/* Early display init.. */
@@ -162,36 +145,20 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
 	intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(display);
 
 	err = intel_display_driver_probe_noirq(xe);
-	if (err) {
-		intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noirq, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noaccel(void *arg)
-{
-	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
-
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return;
-
-	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return 0;
+	if (err)
+		goto err_opregion;
 
 	err = intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(xe);
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err_noirq;
 
-	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noaccel, xe);
+	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_early, xe);
+err_noirq:
+	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
+	intel_power_domains_cleanup(display);
+err_opregion:
+	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
+	return err;
 }
 
 int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
index 233f81a26c255..e2a99624f7064 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe);
 
 int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
 
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe);
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
 int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
 void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
 
@@ -54,9 +52,7 @@ static inline int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 
 static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 
-static inline int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
+static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index 0a7e37f1928e3..4c46809472ae4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -638,10 +638,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
 		return err;
 
 	xe->info.mem_region_mask = 1;
-	err = xe_display_init_nommio(xe);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
 	err = xe_set_dma_info(xe);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -693,10 +689,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = xe_display_init_noirq(xe);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
 	err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
 	if (err)
 		goto err;
@@ -720,7 +712,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
 	 * This is the reason the first allocation needs to be done
 	 * inside display.
 	 */
-	err = xe_display_init_noaccel(xe);
+	err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
 	if (err)
 		goto err;
 
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-06 18:59 [PATCH 0/5] drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Move suballocator init to after display init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: Defer irq init until after xe_display_init_noaccel Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-09 11:17   ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2024-12-09 15:51   ` [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-10  9:35     ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-11 18:32       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-12 14:27         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-12-06 19:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering Patchwork
2024-12-06 19:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-12-06 19:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-09 10:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Jani Nikula
2024-12-09 18:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering. (rev3) Patchwork
2024-12-09 18:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 18:51 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-12-09 21:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241206185956.3290-6-dev@lankhorst.se \
    --to=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox