From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 16:51:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241209155142.209657-1-dev@lankhorst.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206185956.3290-6-dev@lankhorst.se>
Instead of 3 different calls, it should be safe to unify to a single
call now. This makes the init sequence cleaner, and display less
tangled.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
Rebase
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 73 +++++++------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h | 8 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 10 +---
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index 317fa66adf189..b013a4db11183 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -101,19 +101,25 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
}
-static void xe_display_fini_nommio(struct drm_device *dev, void *dummy)
+static void xe_display_fini_early(void *arg)
{
- struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
+ struct xe_device *xe = arg;
struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
if (!xe->info.probe_display)
return;
+ intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(display);
+ intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(display);
+ intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
intel_power_domains_cleanup(display);
}
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
{
+ struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
+ int err;
+
if (!xe->info.probe_display)
return 0;
@@ -123,29 +129,6 @@ int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
/* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
intel_detect_pch(xe);
- return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_display_fini_nommio, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
-{
- struct xe_device *xe = arg;
- struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
-
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return;
-
- intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(display);
- intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
- struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
- int err;
-
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return 0;
-
intel_display_driver_early_probe(display);
/* Early display init.. */
@@ -162,38 +145,20 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(display);
err = intel_display_driver_probe_noirq(display);
- if (err) {
- intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
- return err;
- }
-
- return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noirq, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noaccel(void *arg)
-{
- struct xe_device *xe = arg;
- struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
-
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return;
-
- intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(display);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
- struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
- int err;
-
- if (!xe->info.probe_display)
- return 0;
+ if (err)
+ goto err_opregion;
err = intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(display);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto err_noirq;
- return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noaccel, xe);
+ return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_early, xe);
+err_noirq:
+ intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(display);
+ intel_power_domains_cleanup(display);
+err_opregion:
+ intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
+ return err;
}
int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
index 233f81a26c255..e2a99624f7064 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe);
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
@@ -54,9 +52,7 @@ static inline int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
+static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index fbec176ee64ad..c9c0b74c74ddb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -639,10 +639,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
return err;
xe->info.mem_region_mask = 1;
- err = xe_display_init_nommio(xe);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
err = xe_set_dma_info(xe);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -697,10 +693,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
if (err)
return err;
- err = xe_display_init_noirq(xe);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
if (err)
goto err;
@@ -724,7 +716,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
* This is the reason the first allocation needs to be done
* inside display.
*/
- err = xe_display_init_noaccel(xe);
+ err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
if (err)
goto err;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 18:59 [PATCH 0/5] drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Move suballocator init to after display init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: Defer irq init until after xe_display_init_noaccel Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-09 11:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-09 15:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2024-12-10 9:35 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2024-12-11 18:32 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-12-12 14:27 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-12-06 19:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering Patchwork
2024-12-06 19:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-12-06 19:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-09 10:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Jani Nikula
2024-12-09 18:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/xe/display: Rework display init for reducing flickering. (rev3) Patchwork
2024-12-09 18:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 18:51 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-12-09 21:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241209155142.209657-1-dev@lankhorst.se \
--to=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox