From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/16] drm/i915/de: Register polling cleanup
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:27:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110172756.2132-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Clean up the register polling stuff:
- rename the current wait stuff to
intel_de_wait_{,for_set,for_clear}_ms()
- introduce intel_de_wait_{,for_set,for_clear}_us()
- nuke intel_de_wait_custom()
- change the wakelock stuff to use _fw() instead of
hand rolling yet another level of register accessors
- a few other minor cleanups
After this it should be fairly easy to switch over to
poll_timeout_us().
Ville Syrjälä (16):
drm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way
drm/i915/de: Have intel_de_wait() hand out the final register value
drm/i915/de: Include units in intel_de_wait*() function names
drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_us()
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_us()
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_ms() for the obvious cases
drm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_wait_custom()
drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()
drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms()
drm/1915/dpio: Stop using intel_de_wait_fw_ms()
drm/u195/de: Replace __intel_de_rmw_nowl() with intel_de_rmw_fw()
drm/i915/de: Nuke wakelocks from intel_de_wait_fw_ms()
drm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() with
intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic()
drm/i915/power: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value
drm/i915/dpio: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 35 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 30 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.c | 16 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 98 ++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 34 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 107 +++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +-
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 14 +--
.../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c | 42 +++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c | 25 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 14 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpio_phy.c | 10 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 27 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_flipq.c | 8 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 49 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lt_phy.c | 57 +++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.c | 6 +-
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_display.c | 12 +-
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c | 10 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c | 18 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 10 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sbi.c | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c | 8 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 8 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c | 54 ++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_pll.c | 8 +-
.../drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h | 31 ++---
34 files changed, 369 insertions(+), 402 deletions(-)
--
2.49.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 17:27 Ville Syrjala [this message]
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:52 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/de: Have intel_de_wait() hand out the final register value Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:14 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/de: Include units in intel_de_wait*() function names Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:21 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-11 17:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:24 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:28 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_ms() for the obvious cases Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:32 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-11 17:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_wait_custom() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:33 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:35 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:38 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_us() Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:39 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_ms() Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/1915/dpio: Stop using intel_de_wait_fw_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:41 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/u195/de: Replace __intel_de_rmw_nowl() with intel_de_rmw_fw() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:44 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/de: Nuke wakelocks from intel_de_wait_fw_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() with intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:46 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/power: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:48 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/dpio: " Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:50 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 21:24 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/de: Register polling cleanup Patchwork
2025-11-11 3:41 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 8:01 ` [PATCH 00/16] " Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 16:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-11 19:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110172756.2132-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox