From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:27:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110172756.2132-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110172756.2132-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Currently we use a messy mix of intel_wait_for_register*()
and __intel_wait_for_register*() to implement various
register polling functions. Make the mess a bit more understandable
by always using the __intel_wait_for_register*() stuff.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 17 +++-------
| 31 ++++++-------------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
index 9ecdcf6b73e4..ea9973dbbffc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
@@ -104,15 +104,6 @@ intel_de_rmw(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg, u32 clear, u32 set)
return val;
}
-static inline int
-__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(struct intel_display *display,
- i915_reg_t reg,
- u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_ms)
-{
- return intel_wait_for_register(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
- value, timeout_ms);
-}
-
static inline int
__intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl(struct intel_display *display,
i915_reg_t reg,
@@ -131,8 +122,8 @@ intel_de_wait(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
- ret = __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(display, reg, mask, value,
- timeout_ms);
+ ret = __intel_wait_for_register(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
+ value, 2, timeout_ms, NULL);
intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
@@ -147,8 +138,8 @@ intel_de_wait_fw(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
- ret = intel_wait_for_register_fw(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
- value, timeout_ms, out_value);
+ ret = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
+ value, 2, timeout_ms, out_value);
intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
--git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
index d012f02bc84f..d93ddacdf743 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h
@@ -91,27 +91,6 @@ static inline u32 intel_uncore_rmw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
return xe_mmio_rmw32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, clear, set);
}
-static inline int intel_wait_for_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
- i915_reg_t i915_reg, u32 mask,
- u32 value, unsigned int timeout)
-{
- struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
-
- return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, mask, value,
- timeout * USEC_PER_MSEC, NULL, false);
-}
-
-static inline int intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
- i915_reg_t i915_reg, u32 mask,
- u32 value, unsigned int timeout,
- u32 *out_value)
-{
- struct xe_reg reg = XE_REG(i915_mmio_reg_offset(i915_reg));
-
- return xe_mmio_wait32(__compat_uncore_to_mmio(uncore), reg, mask, value,
- timeout * USEC_PER_MSEC, out_value, false);
-}
-
static inline int
__intel_wait_for_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t i915_reg,
u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int fast_timeout_us,
@@ -133,6 +112,16 @@ __intel_wait_for_register(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t i915_reg,
out_value, atomic);
}
+static inline int
+__intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t i915_reg,
+ u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int fast_timeout_us,
+ unsigned int slow_timeout_ms, u32 *out_value)
+{
+ return __intel_wait_for_register(uncore, i915_reg, mask, value,
+ fast_timeout_us, slow_timeout_ms,
+ out_value);
+}
+
static inline u32 intel_uncore_read_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
i915_reg_t i915_reg)
{
--
2.49.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 17:27 [PATCH 00/16] drm/i915/de: Register polling cleanup Ville Syrjala
2025-11-10 17:27 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2025-11-11 4:52 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/de: Have intel_de_wait() hand out the final register value Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:14 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/de: Include units in intel_de_wait*() function names Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:21 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-11 17:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:24 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:28 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_ms() for the obvious cases Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:32 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-11 17:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_wait_custom() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:33 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:35 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:38 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_us() Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:39 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_ms() Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/1915/dpio: Stop using intel_de_wait_fw_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:41 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/u195/de: Replace __intel_de_rmw_nowl() with intel_de_rmw_fw() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:44 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/de: Nuke wakelocks from intel_de_wait_fw_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() with intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:46 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/power: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:48 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/dpio: " Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:50 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 21:24 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/de: Register polling cleanup Patchwork
2025-11-11 3:41 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 8:01 ` [PATCH 00/16] " Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 16:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-11 19:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110172756.2132-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox