Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [i915-rt v4 10/20] drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 17:33:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251218163408.97508-11-dev@lankhorst.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218163408.97508-1-dev@lankhorst.se>

From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>

Mario Kleiner suggest in commit
  ad3543ede630f ("drm/intel: Push get_scanout_position() timestamping into kms driver.")

a spots where preemption should be disabled on PREEMPT_RT. The
difference is that on PREEMPT_RT the intel_uncore::lock disables neither
preemption nor interrupts and so region remains preemptible.

The area covers only register reads and writes. The part that worries me
is:
- __intel_get_crtc_scanline() the worst case is 100us if no match is
  found.

- intel_crtc_scanlines_since_frame_timestamp() not sure how long this
  may take in the worst case.

It was in the RT queue for a while and nobody complained.
Disable preemption on PREEPMPT_RT during timestamping.

[bigeasy: patch description.]

Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
index d700fd04cb407..a98dd3a436c28 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
@@ -317,6 +317,20 @@ static void intel_vblank_section_exit(struct intel_display *display)
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
 	spin_unlock(&i915->uncore.lock);
 }
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long *flags)
+	__acquires(i915->uncore.lock)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&i915->uncore.lock, *flags);
+}
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long flags)
+	__releases(i915->uncore.lock)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->uncore.lock, flags);
+}
 #else
 static void intel_vblank_section_enter(struct intel_display *display)
 {
@@ -325,6 +339,17 @@ static void intel_vblank_section_enter(struct intel_display *display)
 static void intel_vblank_section_exit(struct intel_display *display)
 {
 }
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	*flags = 0;
+}
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(struct intel_display *display, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	if (flags)
+		return;
+}
 #endif
 
 static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
@@ -361,10 +386,10 @@ static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
 	 * timing critical raw register reads, potentially with
 	 * preemption disabled, so the following code must not block.
 	 */
-	local_irq_save(irqflags);
-	intel_vblank_section_enter(display);
+	intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(display, &irqflags);
 
-	/* preempt_disable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		preempt_disable();
 
 	/* Get optional system timestamp before query. */
 	if (stime)
@@ -428,10 +453,10 @@ static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
 	if (etime)
 		*etime = ktime_get();
 
-	/* preempt_enable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		preempt_enable();
 
-	intel_vblank_section_exit(display);
-	local_irq_restore(irqflags);
+	intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(display, irqflags);
 
 	/*
 	 * While in vblank, position will be negative
@@ -469,13 +494,11 @@ int intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 	unsigned long irqflags;
 	int position;
 
-	local_irq_save(irqflags);
-	intel_vblank_section_enter(display);
+	intel_vblank_section_enter_irqf(display, &irqflags);
 
 	position = __intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
 
-	intel_vblank_section_exit(display);
-	local_irq_restore(irqflags);
+	intel_vblank_section_exit_irqf(display, irqflags);
 
 	return position;
 }
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-18 16:33 [i915-rt v4 00/20] drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 01/20] drm/i915/display: Fix intel_lpe_audio_irq_handler for PREEMPT-RT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 02/20] drm/i915/display: Make get_vblank_counter use intel_de_read_fw() Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 03/20] drm/i915/display: Use intel_de_write_fw in intel_pipe_fastset Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 04/20] drm/i915/display: Make set_pipeconf use the fw variants Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 05/20] drm/i915/display: Move vblank put until after critical section Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 06/20] drm/i915/display: Remove locking from intel_vblank_evade " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 07/20] drm/i915/display: Handle vlv dsi workaround in scanline_in_safe_range too Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 08/20] drm/i915/display: Make icl_dsi_frame_update use _fw too Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 09/20] drm/i915/display: Enable interrupts earlier on PREEMPT_RT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:33 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2025-12-18 16:33 ` [i915-rt v4 11/20] PREEMPT_RT injection Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 12/20] drm/i915/display: Use intel_de_read_fw in colorops Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 13/20] drm/i915/gt: Use spin_lock_irq() instead of local_irq_disable() + spin_lock() Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 14/20] drm/i915: Drop the irqs_disabled() check Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 15/20] drm/i915/guc: Consider also RCU depth in busy loop Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 16/20] Revert "drm/i915: Depend on !PREEMPT_RT." Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 17/20] drm/i915/gt: Fix selftests on PREEMPT_RT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 18/20] drm/i915/gt: Set stop_timeout() correctly on PREEMPT-RT Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 19/20] drm/i915/display: Do not take uncore lock in i915_get_vblank_counter Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 19:33   ` [i915-rt v4.1] " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-20 15:20   ` [i915-rt v4 19/20] " kernel test robot
2025-12-20 15:43   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21  0:35   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-18 16:34 ` [i915-rt v4 20/20] drm/i915/display: Remove uncore lock from vlv_atomic_update_fifo Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 21:06   ` [i915-rt v4.1] " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-18 21:50     ` [i915-rt v4.2] " Maarten Lankhorst
2025-12-20 18:23   ` [i915-rt v4 20/20] " kernel test robot
2025-12-18 17:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe. (rev5) Patchwork
2025-12-18 20:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe. (rev6) Patchwork
2025-12-18 21:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe. (rev7) Patchwork
2025-12-18 23:31 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: All patches to make PREEMPT_RT work on i915 + xe. (rev8) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251218163408.97508-11-dev@lankhorst.se \
    --to=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox